LANDLORD FROM HELL LETTER TRAIL

** PLEASE DESCRIBE THIS IMAGE **THIS PAGE CONTAINS THE ENDLESS TRAIL OF E-LETTERS AND MESSAGES EXCHANGED BETWEEN LANDLORD CHRIS OPPFELT, 13023 NE 32ND PL, BELLEVUE, WA 98005, AND HIS TENANT OLI GLENN THAT HAS THE 5 YEARS LEASE ON HIS CONDOMINIUM IN SALISH VILLAGE.
IT DEMONSTRATES GLENN's PATIENT ATTEMPTS TO JUSTLY RESOLVE THE DEPLORABLE PROBLEM CREATED BY SEXUAL PREDATORS DULIS AND MASON, AND OPPFELT'S WICKED ATTEMPT TO PARALYZE HIM.

LANDLORD OPPFELT LOVES TO PLAY A NICE GUY, BUT HE SHOWED TO BE WICKEDLY AMBIVALENT AND NOT AT ALL TRUSTWORTHY. HE RARELY SPEAKS STRAIGHT, AND ALWAYS LEAVES FOR HIMSELF THE ROOM FOR LATER TWISTS.
AS IT WOULDN'T BE HURTFUL ENOUGH THAT TWO SEXUAL PREDATORS, EMBEZZLERS. AND RACKETEERS - THE PRESIDENT FOR SALISH VILLAGE HOA CRAIG DULIS AND MANAGER CARL MASON SCREWED MY WIFE, DESTROYED OUR 11 1/2 YEARS HAPPY MARRIAGE, RUINED OUR LUCRATIVE BUSINESS VENTURE, AND WRECKED MY LIFE, THE LANDLORD CHRIS OPPFELT HAS PROVED TO BE JUST A PUFFY SCOUNDREL WITH NO REGARDS FOR LAW.

INITIALLY, HE CROWED THAT MY STRIVE FOR JUSTICE COULD JEOPARDIZE HIS PROPERTY VALUE, AND EXERCISED HIS CROOKED TONGUE ON TALKING ME OUT OF MY INTEND TO GET THE DUE PROCESS. MOST OF ALL, HE WANTED TO PREVENT ME TO NOTIFY THE SALISH VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ABOUT DULIS' AND MASON's UNETHICAL, AND CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES AND ALSO TO DIVERT ME FROM PUBLISH OF THE WHOLE STORY ON INTERNET.

ON NOVEMBER 26, 2008, WE HAD A LONG, AND SUPPOSEDLY FRIENDLY CONVERSATION ON THIS SUBJECT, DURING WHICH HE GRADUALLY REVEALED HIS WICKED NATURE. HE CAME TO THE UNITED STATES FROM UKRAINE, AND INSTEAD OF SHOWING A LITTLE RESPECT FOR THE U. S,. LAWS HE BEHAVES AS THE CROOKED 17 CENTURY LORD. ALTHOUGH HE COULD BE MY SON, HE BECAME POSING AS MY SELF-STYLED MENTOR AND INSISTED THAT LYING, SECRETIVE TRICKING, AND ANONYMOUS SCREWING OF THE OTHERS IS THE BEST WAY IN WHICH ANYONE, AND THEREFORE ALSO I COULD ACCOMPLISH MY GOALS.
BEING CARRIED BY HIS BIG EGO, HE ADMITTED THAT LYING AND TWISTING IS HIS SECOND NATURE, AND URGED ME TO DROP MY STRAIGHTFORWARD STYLE AND TO GET EVEN WITH DULIS AND MASON IN HIS CROOKED WAY.

HIS STARTLING BETRAYAL OF HIS BUDDIES IN SAKE OF PRESUMPTIVE PRESERVATION OF HIS PROFIT WAS DUBIOUS, AND HIS WARM AND SUPPOSEDLY FRIENDLY SUGGESTIONS THAT I SHOULD BE AS CREEPY AS HE IS WOULD JUST BRING ME ON HIS AND THEIR SORDID LEVEL.
ALL OF THEM ARE MASTERS OF DECEPTION, SO IN TURN IT WOULD MAKE FOR THEM EASY TO DERAIL ME. IN ADDITION, IT BECAME QUIET OBVIOUS THAT HE IS THE ONE OF THOSE SPINELESS BUTT-LICKERS THAT WOULD ALWAYS INSTINCTIVELY FIND THE "RIGHT" BUTT TO LICK, AND WOULD REVIVE THEIR ROTTEN EGO BY STEPPING ON THOSE THAT THEY CONSIDER POWERLESS. LOOKING BACK, AND RECALLING THEIR FUNNY INITIAL BEHAVIOR, I ALSO HAVE A GOOD REASON TO BELIEVE THAT HE IS TANGLED WITH DULIS AND MASON BY SOME SHADY DEALS, OR THAT THEY DID FOR HIM SOME CROOKED FAVOR WHICH ALL OF THEM WANT TO HUSH UP.
IN EITHER WAY, I DON'T HAVE GOOD FEELINGS ABOUT CROOKS, LIARS AND THE SHABBY CHARACTERS WHICH HE SHOWED TO BE, AND TO DROP ON HIS LEVEL WOULD BE THE LAST THING THAT I WOULD EVER LIKE TO DO.

HOWEVER, HE INSISTED THAT MY STRIVE FOR JUSTICE COULD REDUCE THE VALUE OF HIS SHABBY CONDOMINIUM, AND DECLARED MY EFFORT TO GET THE PROPER LEGAL PUNISHMENT FOR THEM AS THE VENDETTA OF THE OLD ILL MAN, EMBITTERED BY THE FACT THAT HIS ADULTEROUS WIFE LEFT HIM FOR THE YOUNGER MAN, WHO, BY THE CHEER COINCIDENCE, HAPPENED TO BE COMPLETELY INNOCENT MANAGER FOR SALISH VILLAGE HOA.
HIS REASONING WAS LOADED BY HIS GOOFY PREJUDICE, AND EXCEPT OF MY AGE DIDN'T MATCH AT ALL TO THE FACTS SURROUNDING MY AT-THAT-TIME WIFE'S ALLEGEDLY ADULTEROUS MOTIVATION. MOREOVER, HIS ASSERTION THAT NY STRIVE FOR JUSTICE WOULD REDUCE HIS PROPERTY VALUE WAS JUST SHAMEFUL, BECAUSE I HAVE CONSIDERABLY INCREASED THE VALUE OF HIS RUNDOWN CONDOMINIUM BY ITS COMPLETE REFURBISHMENT BEFORE WE HAD MOVED IN.
BUT OF COURSE, HE COULDN'T ADMIT THAT HE IS JUST A LOWLIFE BIGOT, AND BEING FRUSTRATED BY HIS FAILED EFFORT TO COERCE ME TO SILENCE HE THREW STRAIGHT TO MY FACE THAT HIS PROFIT IS MORE IMPORTANT FOR HIM THAN ANY LAW, OR THE QUALITY OF MY LIFE.
BEING ENERGIZED BY THE EQUALLY CROOKED OWNER OF THE LOUSY McCUE & ASSOCIATES THAT MISMANAGED THE SALISH VILLAGE FROM OUTSIDE AT THAT TIME, HE BEGAN WICKEDLY INTERFERING INTO MY AT-HAT-TIME-WIFE'S AND IN MINE LIFE, AND INTO OUR PRIVATE AFFAIRS, AND WANTED ME TO JUST QUIETLY ABSORB THE HUMILIATION AND THE DAMAGES THAT HIS VILLAINOUS PROTÉGÉS DULIS AND MASON INFLICTED ON ME.

FOR THE FUTURE REFERENCES, I HAVE PAINSTAKINGLY RECORDED IN MY E-LETTERS AS MANY DETAILS AS POSSIBLE, AND I ALSO WANTED TO GIVE HIM THE CHANCE TO OPPOSE THE STATED FACTS. IN CONTRARY, HIS CATTY AND JERKY RESPONSES SHOWS HIS ENORMOUS HYPOCRISY, HIS TWISTED CHARACTER, AND HIS SCORN NOT JUST FOR ME, BUT ALSO FOR THE STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS. IT ALSO SHOWS HIS MALICIOUS HARASSMENT, EXTORTION THROUGH COERCION, MOCKERY, ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTIVE EVICTION, AND HIS MALICIOUS INTEND TO CAUSE ME THE MAXIMUM HARM, AND TO EVEN KILL ME.
SINCE HE IS A SLEEK SHYSTER, HE DIDN'T ATTACKED ME BY A BUCHER KNIFE, BUT ATTEMPTED TO MURDER ME (TO MURDER ME IS MOST APPROPRIATE WORD) BY THE COMBINATION OF MY MEDICAL CONDITIONS, AND BY THE ENORMOUS STRESS AND HAZARDOUS ENVIRONMENT THAT HE WILLFULLY FORCES ON ME IN HIS UNIT .

SEE MORE

** PLEASE DESCRIBE THIS IMAGE **

IN ADDITION TO HIS OTHER THREATS, ON NOVEMBER 26, 2008, DURING HIS PHONE-CALL AND DURING HIS FOLLOW-UP VISIT IN MY HOME, THE CROOKED LANDLORD OPPFELT INTIMIDATED ME BY THE ALLEGED INVALIDITY OF MY LEASE. HE, AND McCUE, INSISTED THAT THE LEASE WHICH I HAVE SIGNED WITH HIM IS INVALID AND THEREFORE IS UNENFORCEABLE. FOR THAT REASON, I'M ACTUALLY JUST ON THE MONTH-TO-MONTH TENANCY, AND I'M SUBJECTED TO THE 30 DAYS EVICTION NOTICE IF I WOULDN'T QUIT MY STRIVE FOR JUSTICE, THEY THREATENED ME.
HOWEVER, A FEW DAYS LATER, IN HIS E-MESSAGE FROM DECEMBER 02, 2008 11:17 AM THE SHYSTER-LANDLORD OPPFELT SAYS: "Since I have no desire or intention to shorten the term of our lease and nor do you, I don't think there's much of an issue." DEPLORABLY, HIS FURTHER ACTIONS PROVED THAT IT WAS A PLAIN LIE!!!
CONSIDERING HIS AND McCUE's THREATS, AND THEIR WICKED ATTEMPTS TO SILENT ME, SUCH EXPRESSIONS AS "I DON'T THINK," AND "MUCH OF ISSUE," JUST DEMONSTRATE HIS CROOKED TONGUE AND HIS VIRTUOSITY IN USING OF TRICKY AND CATTILY NICE LANGUAGE. SINCE HE ALREADY REVEALED HIS INTEND TO FORCE ME TO THE ROLE OF A FALL-GUY, AND WANTED ME TO ABSORB THE DAMAGES THAT DULIS AND MASON INFLICTED ON ME, AND HAD FORCED ME OUT OF SALISH VILLAGE (DEATH OR ALIVE), I COULDN'T GIVE A DAMN FOR HIS CROOKEDLY NICE WORDS THAT HE WROTE ME IN HIS DECEMBER 02, 2008 E-MAIL.

AT THE TIME OF SIGNING THE LEASE WHICH HE PRODUCED, HE PLAYED A VERY NICE GUY. HE TOLD US THAT WE DON'T NEED TO BE WORRY ABOUT FORMALITIES, BECAUSE HE IS A REAL ESTATE AGENT AND KNOWS HOW TO HANDLE THEM. HOWEVER, LATER HE, AND McCUE, BECAME THREATENING ME BY THE ALLEGED INVALIDITY OF THAT LEASE. THEN, WHEN I HAD ASKED HIM TO BRING IT TO THE VALID STATE, HE REFUSED TO DO THAT!!!
THEN, AFTER I SPENT $375 ON ITS LEGAL EVALUATION, AND THE LEASE HAS PROVED TO BE PERFECTLY VALID, THIS CREEP CHANGED HIS STRATEGY AND BEGAN FORCING ON ME THE FLATLY ILLEGAL "CONSTRUCTIVE EVICTION." MOREOVER, AT THE TIME OF SIGNING THE LEASE, HE INSISTED THAT HIS UNIT IS NONE-SMOKING AND THAT WE SHOULDN'T ALLOW ANYBODY TO SMOKE THERE. HIS EXPLICIT INSISTENCE WAS JUST FINE WITH US, BECAUSE I SUFFER BY ASTHMA AND MY AT-THAT-TIME WIFE HAD THE HEALTH ISSUES AGGRAVATED BY SMOKE.
HOWEVER, A COUPLE DAYS LATER, WE HAVE REALIZED THAT THE NEIGHBOR BELOW IS A HEAVY SMOKER, AND THAT THERE IS THE SERIOUS PROBLEM WITH THE SMOKE COMING FROM HIS UNIT. AT THAT TIME, THE LANDLORD OPPFELT WAS STILL NICE AND WE IMMEDIATELY BEGAN FIXING THIS PROBLEM. NONETHELESS, FROM THE TIME WHEN I HAVE REFUSED TO QUIT MY QUEST FOR JUSTICE HE WANTS TO UNDERMINE MY HEALTH AND REFUSES TO FINALIZE FIXING OF THIS PROBLEM. OUTRAGEOUSLY, HE EVEN PROHIBITED ME TO FINALIZE THE WORK JUST ON MY OWN.
IN THE OTHER WORDS, THIS BLOODY CREEP FORCES ME TO BREATH THE CIGARETTE SMOKE IN HIS EXPLICITLY NONSMOKING UNIT, AND THUS WILLFULLY AGGRAVATES MY ASTHMA AND MY OTHER MEDICAL PROBLEMS.
ON TOP OF THAT, HE ALSO REFUSES TO DO THE BASIC MAINTENANCE IN HIS SHABBY UNIT, AND IN HIS MESSAGE FROM DECEMBER 13, 2008 1:38 PM HE WROTE: "Further, since your tenancy will be coming to end fairly soon there's really no point having you make any changes to the electrical wiring to enable two-way control of the hallway light."
HE WROTE ME THIS CREEPY REASONING, ALTHOUGH I HAVE REPEATED TO HIM, VERBALLY AND IN WRITING, THAT I WAS SWEATING BLOOD DURING THE REFURBISHING OF HIS RUNDOWN UNIT, AND HAD DONE ALL THAT WORK FOR FREE, WITH THE INTEND TO STAY THERE FOR AT LEAST 5 YEARS. THEREFORE, I HAVE NO INTENTION TO BOWE TO THE CROOKS AND TO END MY OCCUPANCY BEFORE THE END OF MY LEASE.
SHOCKINGLY, IT LATER SURFACED THAT AT THE TIME WHEN HE SENT ME HIS CREEPY MESSAGE, HE, AND HIS TWO VILLAINOUS PROTÉGÉS DULIS AND MASON ALREADY PROCEEDED IN THEIR WICKED PLAN TO COERCE MY AT-THAT-TIME WIFE TO FILING OF THE PHONY PETITION FOR THE BOGUS PROTECTIVE ORDER AGAINST ME. THEN, THEY WANTED TO SET ME FOR ITS VIOLATION AND HAVE ME JAILED. THIS SHOULD COMPLETELY DISCREDIT ME, AND IT WOULD ALSO ALLOW CREEPY OPPFELT TO REVOKE MY LEASE.
THEY WERE AFRAID THAT MY WIFE's PLANED SEXUAL HARASSMENT LAWSUIT AGAINST PREDATORY DULIS COULD SHAD THE LIGHT ON HIS, AND MASON's CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES IN SALISH VILLAGE, SO THEY DESPERATELY NEEDED TO STOP HER AND TO TURN HER AGAINST ME. THERE WAS A LOT AT STAKE FOR THEM, SO JUST A FEW DAYS AFTER OPPFELT's CREEPY MESSAGE, THEY RUSHED TO HONDURAS WITH THE INTEND TO COMMIT THERE THE CRIME OF COERCION AND BRIBERY.
THE 56 Y/O BOORISH SEXUAL PREDATOR DULIS FINANCED THE WHOLE VENTURE, AND TO MAKE MOST OUT OF IT HE MOLESTED THERE 22 Y/O CLAUDIA X. SHE WAS SPREADING HER LEGS FOR HIM, IN EXCHANGE FOR HIS PROMISES THAT HE WOULD EVADE THE IMMIGRATION LAWS, AND WOULD BRING HER O THE UNITED STATES ILLEGALLY TAS HIS PHONY WIFE
.

WITH OPPFELT's HELP THEY ULTIMATELY SUCCEEDED, AND BY THE BREAK OF 2008 AND 2009, THEY BROUGHT MY BRIBED, BRAINWASHED AND COERCED AT-THAT-TIME WIFE BACK TO THE UNITED STATES, AND COMPELLED HER TO FILING OF THE PRE-PLANED PHONY PETITION. THANKS TO THE UTTERLY BIAS JUDGE HARRY McCARTHY, SHE ACTUALLY OBTAINED THE BOGUS PROTECTIVE ORDER AND THEY BECAME PROCEEDING WITH THE SECOND PART OF THEIR WICKED PLOT.
IN HIS MESSAGE FROM DECEMBER 10, 2008 9:48 AM, THE SHYSTER-LANDLORD OPPFELT DEMANDED FROM ME THE CONTACT INFORMATION ON MY WIFE, AND HIS MESSAGE FROM DECEMBER 13, 2008 PROVES THAT HE ALREADY COUNTED ON THEIR SUCCESS. HOWEVER, AFTER ENORMOUS STRUGGLES, THAT BOGUS ORDER WAS EVENTUALLY REPEALED AND THEIR PLOT COLLAPSED. THEN, INSTEAD OF BEING THE ASSET, SHE BECAME A DANGEROUS BURDEN FOR THEM AND THOSE CREEPS QUICKLY SENT HER BACK TO HONDURAS, ALL EXPENSES PAID.

IN THE OTHER OCCASION, IN HIS MESSAGE FROM DECEMBER 2-2008-11:17 AM THE SHYSTER-LANDLORD OPPFELT SAYS: "Carl may have stirred up the pot some at McCue by sticking his nose in your & Wendy's business (and may have done so at the behest of Wendy) but at this point, McCue and I are in complete agreement that this matter is strictly between us (as landlord and tenant)."
HOWEVER, NOTICE WHAT HE SAYS IN HIS MESSAGE FROM MARCH 02, 2009 3:25 PM. AND HOW IT CONTRADICTS HIS STATEMENT ABOVE. ONCE AGAIN, HIS CREEPY LANGUAGE DEMONSTRATES HIS CROOKED CHARACTER!!!
IN FACT, THE VILLAINOUS SEXUAL PREDATOR MASON "STIRRED UP THE POT," BUT NOT AT THE BEHEST OF WENDY. HE TRICKED ME BY HIS PRETENDED FRIENDSHIP, AND SHAMELESSLY USED HIS POSITION IN SALISH VILLAGE, AND ALSO HIS REGULAR WORK TIME ON STICKING HIS NOSE INTO OUR PRIVATE AFFAIRS SO MUCH, THAT IT LED TO MY-AT-THAT-TIME WIFE'S ADULTERY AND TO OUR DIVORCE.
THEN, WHEN DESPITE OF OUR SEPARATION WE STILL WANTED TO TAKE HIS BOSS AND BUDDY IN CRIME - THE PRESIDENT DULIS TO THE COURT OF LAW FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND ASSAULT, HE, AND HIS BUDDY DULIS, RUSHED TO HONDURAS TO BRAINWASH HER THERE AND TO COERCE HER TO THE COOPERATION WITH THEM.
IRONICALLY, I HAVE INITIALLY INTENDED TO LEAVE THIS BLOODY TWISTER OPPFELT OUT OF THE WHOLE ISSUE, AND WANTED TO RESOLVE THE PROBLEM WITHOUT EVER INVOLVING HIM. HOWEVER, IN HIS DECEMBER 02, 2008 11:17 AM MESSAGE, HE, AND CREEPY McCUE INSISTED THAT I HAVE TO RESOLVE THE PROBLEM THROUGH HIM.
AND OF COURSE, THEY WANTED TO FRAGMENT MY EFFORT, MIX ME UP, AND EVENTUALLY DERAIL ME. THE LATER CORRESPONDENCE WITH THIS BLOODY TWISTER DOCUMENTS THAT HE BLOCKED ALL MY FORMAL COMPLAINTS THAT I HAVE FILED WITH HIM AND EFFECTIVELY STONEWALL ME. (SEE THE COMPLAINTS FROM DECEMBER 20, 2008 12:15 AM, AND FROM DECEMBER 27,2008 3:16 PM , AND ALSO THE FORMAL COMPLAINT THAT I HAVE FILED WITH HIM ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2009 22:09.)

IN HIS MESSAGE FROM DECEMBER 03, 2008 9:19 AM, THIS ARROGANT AND PUFFY SHYSTER SAYS: "I am unable to read your latest email. I asked you to respect our landlord - tenant relationship with regard to communicating with me only those things which are pertinent to this relationship."
THIS LOUSY CREEP ACTS LIKE THE UKRAINIAN ARISTOCRAT, BUT IT WAS HIM WHO INSISTED THAT EVERYTHING REGARDING THE SALISH VILLAGE MUST GO THROUGH HIM AND FORCEFULLY INSERTED HIMSELF TO MY DRIVE FOR JUSTICE. ALSO, NOTICE HOW HE MOCKS ME AND INSULTS ME IN HIS RESPONSES ON MY COMPLAINT FROM SEPTEMBER 17, 2009 22:09, AND JUDGE FOR YOURSELF WHAT KIND OF BLOODY CREEP HE IS.

THE ABOVE QUOTATIONS ARE JUST A FEW EXAMPLES FOR ALL. FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE SCROLL THROUGH THE LETTERS AND MESSAGES, OR SELECT THEM INDIVIDUALLY BY USING THE LINKS ON LEFT.


I NEED TO EMPHASIZE THAT THE TIME BETWEEN THE END OF SEPTEMBER OF 2008 WHEN I HAVE BECOME AWARE ABOUT MASON's MINGLING WITH MY WIFE, AND THE FEBRUARY OF 2009 WHEN I WAS ABLE TO REBOUND FROM THEIR WICKED PRESSURE, WAS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT AND STRESSFUL FOR ME. IT WAS THE TIME OF CUTTING THROUGH THEIR LIES, DEALING WITH THE HIGH EMOTIONS, AND STAGGERING BETWEEN THE WICKED DECEPTION AND DIRTY TRICKS THAT THIS BUNCH OF CREEPS DULIS, MASON AND OPPFELT RELENTLESSLY FORCED ON ME.
EVENTUALLY, WHILE I WAS STRUGGLING WITH HIM, ON DECEMBER 31 OF 2008, I HAD SUFFERED BY ANOTHER STROKE. MY DOCTOR BELIEVES THAT IT WAS THE ARROGANT AMBIVALENCE, EXTORTION, BLACKMAILING, COERCION, AND MALICIOUS HARASSMENT TO WHICH I HAD BEEN SUBJECTED PRIMARILY BY THE BLOODY LANDLORD OPPFELT THAT EVENTUALLY TOOK ITS TOLL ON ME, AND ALMOST KILLED ME.

IT IS JUST A LOGIC OF THINGS THAT ALL OF THEM WOULD LIKE TO SEE ME DEATH, BUT TO THEIR GREAT DISAPPOINTMENT I'M STILL HERE. I HAVE ALREADY BEEN ON THE OTHER SIDE, BUT BEFORE I'D GO THERE PERMANENTLY I'LL DO EVERYTHING IN MY POWER TO GET JUSTICE AND THE PROPER PUNISHMENT FOR EACH OF THEM.
IF I WOULD NOT SUCCEED, AND IF THERE IS THE AFTERLIFE AFTER ALL, AND IF THERE IS ANY CONNECTION BETWEEN OUR WORLD AND THE OTHER WORLD, THEN I'LL CONTINUE IN PURSUING THEM EVEN FROM THERE.

SEXUAL HARASSMENT BY DULIS - BEGINNING OF TROUBLES

THE YEAR OF 2008 WAS A LOUSY YEAR FOR MY AT-THAT-TIME WIFE AND FOR ME, BUT ITS LAST QUARTER WAS THE ONE OF MOST CREEPY TIMES OF MY LIFE.
I WAS RECOVERING FROM THE COMPLICATIONS AFTER THE MASSIVE HEART ATTACK, AND SPENT ALL MY ENERGY ON PUTTING MY WIFE IN BUSINESS, AND ON FINALIZING THE ONE-OF-THE-LIFETIME BUSINESS VENTURE WHICH SHOULD FINANCE THE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE DYNAMIC PROPULSION SYSTEM, AND SHOULD ALSO MAKE ENOUGH MONEY ON STARTING OF THE WHOLE NEW INDUSTRY IN THE UNITED STATES. THE TROUBLES STARTED IN SPRING, WHEN DESPITE OF THEIR PREVIOUS PROMISES THAT THEY WOULDN'T DO THAT, THE GROUP OF INVESTORS SUDDENLY DECIDED TO CONVERT OUR APARTMENT COMPLEX ONTO CONDOMINIUMS AND BEGAN EVICTING US FROM THE PLACE WHERE I WAS FOR PAST 15 YEARS.
IT WAS THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE INSANE HOUSING FRENZY, AND SEEKING THE AFFORDABLE APARTMENT WE HAVE EVENTUALLY SIGNED THE 5-YEARS LEASE WITH THE SLEEK INVESTMENT SPECIALIST CHRIS OPPFELT ON HIS RUNDOWN CONDOMINIUM IN SALISH VILLAGE. BEFORE LONG, WE HAVE RUN INTO THE PRESIDENT FOR SALISH VILLAGE HOA CRAIG DULIS AND INTO HIS BUDDY MANAGER CARL MASON AND THERE THE REAL TROUBLES STARTED. THEY BOTH WERE EXTRAORDINARY FRIENDLY, AND WE HAD NO IDEA THAT THEY BOTH ARE SEXUAL PREDATORS, EMBEZZLERS AND RACKETEERS.

AFTER OUR HECTIC FORCED RELOCATION, WE HAD THE COMPELLING DESIRE TO MAKE NO ENEMIES BUT FRIENDS, AND THOSE TWO VILLAINS TOOK THE INDECENT ADVANTAGE OF IT. SHORTLY AFTER, THE DRUNKEN PRESIDENT DULIS BECAME HARASSING ME, BECAUSE OF MY WIFE'S AND MY AGE DIFFERENCE. HIS BOORISH EXTEMPORE WAS EXTREMELY EMBARRASSING FOR BOTH OF US, BUT BECAUSE WE WERE NEW THERE, AND HE WAS THE PRESIDENT FOR SALISH VILLAGE HOA, WE HAD JUST SWALLOWED HIS INSULTS AND TRIED TO GET ON GOOD TERMS WITH HIM. MOREOVER, DURING OUR PREVIOUS ENCOUNTERS WE HAD NOTICED THAT HE IS A DRUG JUNKIE, SELF-CONCENTRIC BRAGGER, COMPULSIVE DETRACTOR, AND CALUMNIATOR. SO, WE HAD NO DOUBT THAT HE WOULD HEAVILY SLANDER US IF WE WOULD UPSET HIM.

REGRETTABLY, IT HAD TURNED TO BE A FATEFUL DECISION, BECAUSE DUE TO HIS ENORMOUS EGO, HE, QUITE OBVIOUSLY, HAD INTERPRETED OUR GOOD-WILL IN HIS OWN ODD WAY. SO, IT HAD HAPPENED THAT ON JULY 31, 2008, HE CAME DRUNK TO OUR APARTMENT AND RIGHT IN FRONT OF MY EYES BEGAN DEMANDING THE SEXUAL FAVOR FROM MY WIFE. WE BOTH WERE VERY UPSET, AND EVENTUALLY (PRESIDENT OR NO PRESIDENT) WE THREW HIM OUT OF OUR APARTMENT.
AND OF COURSE, A FEW DAYS LATER THE SALISH VILLAGE HOA REQUESTED OUR BACKGROUND REPORT, AND WE HAVE LEARNED THAT OUR OBSERVATION OF HIS STREAKS WAS CORRECT AND THAT HE SLANDERS US AROUND. EVEN THOUGH, I STILL HAD NOT HAD A DESIRE TO GET IN FIGHT WITH HIM, AND WITH ANYBODY IN SALISH VILLAGE, AND HAD INCLINED TO JUST SMOOTH IT UP, SOMEHOW. BUT MY WIFE HADN'T.
BEING VERY TIRED OF EVERYTHING WHAT WE HAD BEEN THROUGH DURING THE PAST FEW MONTHS, I HAD DECIDED TO AT LEAST WRITE THE LETTER, BELOW, TO OUR LANDLORD CHRIS OPPFELT. HE SEEMED TO BE A NICE GUY AT THAT TIME, AND I HOPED THAT WOULD USE HIS POSITION OF A HOMEOWNER AND WOULD "SEND THE MESSAGE" TO DULIS, AND WOULD PUT HIM ON NOTICE THAT HIS BEHAVIOR TOWARD HIS TENANTS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. UNFORTUNATELY, I DIDN'T KNOW THAT HE IS JUST A BLOODY CREEP AND WICKED HYPOCRITE, AND ON TOP OF THAT IS ALSO A BUDDY-BUDDY WITH DULIS AND MASON. SO, I HAD CREDULOUSLY ACCEPTED HIS CONCILIATORY SUGGESTION, WHICH EVENTUALLY COST ME MORE THAT I WOULD EVER IMAGINE. 

MY WIFE ALWAYS LOOKED AT ME AS AT HER PROTECTOR, AND DUE TO MY PEACE-MAKING APPROACH TOWARD DULIS' SEXUAL HARASSMENT, I HAVE LOST A LOT IN HER EYES.  THEN, THAT DECEIVING SOB MASON TOOK THE INDECENT ADVANTAGE OF OUR VULNERABILITY, AND FROM THAT POINT FORWARD EVERYTHING TOOK A TRULY BIZARRE TURN.
HISTORICALLY, WOMEN AND CHILDREN ARE ALWAYS THE WEAKEST SEGMENTS IN EVERY SOCIETY, AND THE ALL WHAT WE HAD BEEN THROUGH WAS WAY TOO MUCH FOR MY LITTLE (SHE IS JUST BARELY 5') AT-THAT-TIME WIFE TO CARRY. SO, SHE EVENTUALLY SNAPPED AND BECAME AN EASY PRAY FOR THOSE TWO SCAVENGING CREEPS. WHILE ABUSING THEIR POSITIONS IN SALISH VILLAGE, THEY TOOK THE FULL ADVANTAGE OF OUR STRESSFUL SITUATION AND COMPLETELY SCREWED HER.
SOON, IT BECAME CLEAR TO ME THAT I'M NOT JUST DEALING WITH THE DISGUSTING SEXUAL PREDATORS, EMBEZZLERS, AND RACKETEERS, BUT ALSO WITH THE HARDCORE VILLAINS THAT WOULDN'T HESITATE TO DO THE MOST HEINOUS CRIMES AND WOULD EVEN ATTEMPT TO KILL ME.

From: Kamarech
Sent: August 13, 2008 5:31 AM
To: Chris Oppfelt

Hi Chris,

For a good reason, we are positive that it is not just a coincidence that they here in Salish Village suddenly waked up and request our background report. We also think that we know for sure from which direction the wind blows.
When we moved in, we wanted to make some friends here. And, as I told you today, we were also socializing with the chair of the condominium board Greg. I'm not sure about spelling of his name.
But perhaps you should know at first that in the one occasion Greg told us that our neighbor with whom you were talking today is a good friend of his. Beside of some swanky informations about his and her private relations, he also told us that he elected her to the function of treasurer here (or something like that) and in turn she elected him to the function of the chairman of the board. I don't know how this could happen (our impression was that probably not too many people attend the board meetings), but that's what he told us.

Numerous times, we were having friendly talk with Greg, and in one occasion have visited him in his apartment. Then, couple of times we had invited him for a dinner. Several times, when we were just causally talking when by a coincidence we met each other outside, he made some kinky remarks that involved my wife. At that time, I wasn't terribly alarmed, but my wife found them improper and degrading.
He is an unemployed salesman specializing in textiles, and is separated from his wife. As he told us, she accuses him that he is a drunken shit, and a by-sexual violent creep that he is beating on her, and of all kind of other things that I just couldn't recall now. His older daughter allegedly hates him for the things that he had done in his life.
He is a first generation Greek descent, and claims that served to his country as a member of the Special Forces in Vietnam. He is very proud that together with his buddies he was doing to Vietnamese those most ugly things, he said. At the same time, however, he claims that he was deeply involved in the hippies anti-war movement. He was never able to explain how those two things go together.
I know that the salesmen typically talk a lot, and I wasn't taking his rather dirty remarks on Wendy's account too seriously. But Wendy become having bad feelings about his nature, and didn't want to continue in socializing with him. However, it was somewhat awkward to cut him off just like that, and thus acquire a potential enemy.

So, it had happened that I have invited him again for a diner. On Thursday, July 31, he came and told us that he was tired by moving his stuff from his unit to the other unit, and that he took some rest before he came and also a several puffs. He didn't look drunk, but obviously he was.
We didn't offered him anything alcoholic after the dinner, but he became increasingly loud and rude. Beside of the other boorish talking, he become demanding that I would stay here (in our apartment) and Wendy would go with him to his unit. I was trying to have him to change the subject, but Wendy became embarrassed and increasingly outraged.
He had had such improper suggestions several times before, but I was taking it as the unsuitable joking of the horny man separated from his wife. But Wendy became uneasy with me, and blamed me that, as she said, I just calmly watch as he is insulting her. As you may notice, she is not very outgoing and doesn't like to talk too much. Therefore, she looks at me as on her spokesman and protector.
At that day, I have realized that he must be serious with his dirty suggestions and have reacted sharply. But he is sleek and has a fast running mouse, so he tried to talk me down and began insulting me by such statements, as for instance that I'm a Communist product, don't understand to America, and much more. Throughout the time, I have heard so many such insults that I don't even listen to them. We continued talking, but a tension was growing. During that time I had in mind that he is a chair of the board, and was trying to wrap that hectic dinner in the harmless and civilized way.
On the other side, I was also getting enough of his arrogant and boorish behavior. We have exchanged some words, but he became unbearably offensive to me. When he realized that he couldn't bend me down, and couldn't intimidate me, he became so angry that he hit our glass dining table by the closed fist so hard that it was a miracle that he didn't break it. Then, I told him that enough is enough, so he left yelling that we (and especially I) don't belong to America.
Wendy was very upset, because she felt that he views her, and treats her, as some sort of a hooker that I picked up yesterday so she could go with him today, obviously because she is a Latina that married the older man. She tried to tell to Greg how she feels about him, but her voice died out in his self concentrated mostly monologue extempore. When he left, we were both upset and she right away wanted to file a lawsuit against him for a sexual harassment.

She, however, doesn't know how to proceed in the legal issues, and wants me to help her with that. I was able to slowly calm her down, but now she is upset again and regrets that she didn't file that lawsuit, yet. I'm trying to talk her out of it because it might create many enemies, and also could make you uncomfortable with us as tenants. But it creates a friction between us, and some kind of Wendy's disillusion about me.
As the result, instead of sleeping, at about 4:30 in the morning I'm writing you this letter. She is even more upset because she senses that having not enough of what he done to her, Greg is behind that late and sudden request of the report on us.

Today, when I made an eye contact with our neighbor - Greg's very good friend (that he slanders just as he slanders the other) just before she began talking to you, I immediately knew that she is a trouble. I spoke about it with Wendy, but initially we were not able to figure out what she could have against us. Just a couple weeks ago, Wendy had a friendly talk with her, and asked her whether we don't somewhat unwillingly bother her. She also told her to not hesitate and tell us if we would, and we would be more than happy to correct the problem.

She might tell you that she is OK with us, but we know a lot about hypocrisy, and after we have received your e-mail telling us that you were requested to submit a report on us, we knew right away from which direction the wind blows. We are so sure about it, because during our socializing Greg loved to talk a lot about the other people. Without ever asking him, he told us a lot of sometimes very private things about some people here that are close to him. It is obvious that they definitely wouldn't expect him to freely talk about their private things behind their back, but he enjoys himself and doesn't care.
Neither Wendy, nor I like to hear about the other people's private affairs, and we felt uncomfortable when Greg was talking about them. Since we already know some of those people, we trying to take a neutral position and didn't know what we should say in response.
We have realized that he is a blunt slanderer, and have no doubt that he would be talking about us as he talks about the others, if we would give him a chance. Moreover, it really looks like that, in the one way or the other, he is behind the scene.

I'm writing you this letter to inform you about what happened, because Wendy doesn't deserve such a treatment and definitely has a good reason to be upset. I tend to look at this issue as a man, but if she would insist on filing of the sexual harassment lawsuit, I wouldn't sacrifice our relationship by holding her back and will support her.

What the day today. There is already light outside; but after I'll send it to you I'll go to try to get some sleep.

Oli

From: Chris Oppfelt
Sent: August 13, 2008 7:51 AM
To: Kamarech

Yikes! Hopefully you will get this resolved before too long. Like you say, it's pretty easy for the landlord to run to court and get a judgment based on their lease agreement. Much harder for you to prove the trail of deception and poor property management practices. FIghting your position may be a challenge but you've got a great case and lots of evidence to support your cause.

I'll turn in the docs I have to the Salish Village management co. These civil judgments shouldn't impact anything with respect to our lease agreement.

As to where this information turned up, I ordered a "tenant screening report" from an on-line screening company (e-renter.com). All they are able to access are those things available from public records. The only thing the report I have shows is the court jurisdiction, plaintiff, defendent, case #, type of filing, judgment amount. As such, the report I have doesn't provide any sense of the underlying issue or what's really going on. I'll scan the page and send it to you if you want it. I don't think there is anything you need to specifically dispute unless the "public records" themselves are inaccuate (in which case it's the public records themselves that would need to be corrected).

Chris

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  August 13, 2008 8:31 AM
To:  Kamarech

I don't think the request from the management company for me to comply with Association rules and your run ins with Greg are at all related. The management company has better things to do than chase down us landlords who don't turn in the needed paperwork (like when there is a change in tenants) but they always get around to it eventually. I expected them to figure out that they didn't have current docs from me and request them from me. This time it only took them ~ 3 months.

I don't know Greg other than seeing him at a few homeowner meetings. If he's a jerk and a creep, I'd steer clear of him. Your kind gestures of inviting him to dinner obviously didn't work out well. You don't want him to be your enemy but you also don't need him to be a friend/ally. Again, steer clear, avoid/minimize interactions and he'll get the hint. If he's a big time backstabber, it's likely that few of the people around Salish Village have much respect for him.

Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  August 13, 2008 11:49 AM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Hi Chris,

Thank you for your response. I think that you are right on the target in both cases. The Judge in the court was clearly on our side, and was really hard on LLC and its lawyer. He even expressed his open sympathies for our cause, and regretted that his hands are tied by the law and he has to give the case to LLC. He told us that he has to do that, because the law is very strict in such case as ours and he has to follow it. If he would make a judgment for us, the LLC would appeal and the higher court will return the case back to him. The legal advisors that we were speaking with also told us that we have a strong case against LLC, and those crooks there would be eventually happy to settle. But you never know.

In the case of Greg, Wendy still feels that he "works" behind our back, and the sudden request of our background is his snide retaliation because he was rebuffed with his gross demands for her sexual favor. I am looking at the whole issue same as you do, and from my side I know that he is just a narrow-minded puffy moron, and his insults of myself don’t go even to my shoes. But Wendy looks at it as a woman and she feels otherwise.
Just a day before yesterday, we have ran into him and he rushed to shake our hands as we would be a good old friends. I shook his hand, but Wendy didn't. There is just a very few things that she hates, and hypocrisy is most definitely on the first place. She didn’t recover yet from the first wave of her outrage during his last visit in our apartment, and now it came this. She is now back into a combat mood, and wants him to step down from his function of a chairman. So, we are yet to see how it would develop.

Thanks again for your response.

Oli

LANDLORD OPPFELT ATTEMPTS TO COERCE ME TO SILENCE

AFTER THE INITIALLY NICE LANDLORD OPPFELT LEARNED THAT I'M DETERMINED TO SEEK LEGAL PUNISHMENT FOR THOSE TWO SEXUAL PREDATORS, EMBEZZLERS, AND RACKETEERS DULIS AND MASON, HE BECAME THREATENING ME OVER THE PHONE, AND THEN EVEN CAME TO MY HOME WITH THE INTEND TO COERCE ME INTO INACTION. 
DURING HIS VISIT, HE REVEALED HIS LOUSY AND DISGRACEFUL CHARACTER, AND I HAVE REALIZED THAT HE HEAVILY RELIES ON COMBINATION OF THE GOOD IMPRESSION THAT HE MAKES AND HIS CROOKED TONGUE.  AND, I LIVE LONG ENOUGH TO KNOW THAT AS ALL CROOKS OF HIS KIND, HE WOULD LIE, TWIST AND EVEN DENY THE SORDID THINGS THAT HE TOLD ME.  THEREFORE, I SENT HIM THE LETTER BELOW MAINLY AS THE RECOUNT OF HIS WORDS AND ACTIONS, AND HIS CROOKED REACTION PROVED THAT I WAS RIGHT. 

INSTEAD OF SUPPORTING ME AS HIS TENANT, OR AT LEAST STAYING NEUTRAL, HE CONTINUED IN ABUSING OF HIS POSITION OF LANDLORD, AND TOGETHER WITH THE McCUE & ASSOCIATES CONSIDERABLY ENLARGED THE ALREADY ENORMOUS DAMAGES THAT HIS TWO PROTÉGÉS DULIS AND MASON ALREADY INFLICTED ON ME.  NOTICE HIS INITIALLY CATTY, AND LATER OPEN ARROGANCE, AND HIS MALICIOUS INTERFERING INTO MY PRIVATE AFFAIRS WITH THE INTEND TO HARM ME.  ALSO NOTICE HIS WICKED MOCKERY, HIS CYNICAL VIOLATIONS OF THE STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS,  AND HIS ULTIMATE ATTEMPT TO CAUSE MY PREMATURE DEATH - TO KILL ME.


THE NOVEMBER 26, 2008,  BECAME THE TURNING POINT IN OUR PREVIOUSLY GOOD LANDLORD-TENANT RELATIONS, AND THE E-LETTERS IN THE SECTION "OPPFELT AT THE BEGINNING" DEMONSTRATE MY AT-THAT-TIME WIFE'S AND MINE GOOD WILL, AND OUR HARD WORK INVESTED INTO HIS RUNDOWN UNIT TO MAKE IT LIVABLE.

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 01, 2008 5:39 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

In Kirkland, December 1, 2008

To: Chris Oppfelt

Dear Chris,

Thank you for visiting me on November 26, 2008 in my currently solitary confinement. I can understand to your concerns, and truly appreciate your effort to talk me out of my decision to take those two individuals President Dulis and manager Mason that hold two top positions in Salish Village to the court of public opinion.
Regrettably, both grossly abused their top positions to which they were brought by the Salish Village property owners, took the indecent advantage of my wife’s and my social vulnerability steaming from our status of “first generation Americans,” and caused the major damage to our lives. I believe that my currently estranged wife finally realized that manager Mason never had any intention to marry her, as she obviously naively believed, and that we booth were subjected to President Dulis’ and manager Mason’s dirty game that they played with us in order to discredit her as the adulterous wife and promiscuous and easy woman.
I believe that she also realized that the $1,100 that manager Mason gave her wasn’t a good fait gif, but the hush-money that combined with his monkeyshines should paralyze her, and at the same time should drive her away from the Salish Village and away from me.

I’m positive that they are not as professionally effective as you have portrayed them, and that the property value of individual units in Salish Village rose during the six years of their management primarily due to the rapidly growing bubble in the housing market between late 2001 and 2007.  Even if they would have good professional qualities, I hold that everybody is replaceable and even the American presidents are replaced once in few years.
Therefore, I wouldn’t backup from my plan to take the President for Salish Village Condominium Association Craig Dulis to the court of public opinion for sexual harassment of my estranged wife, and for repeatedly insulting both of us because of our unwillingness to agree with his opinions and to tolerate his predatory demands of her sexual favor; and also for his consequent insulting us because of our national origin.
I also want to take to the court of public opinion the property manager Carl Mason for using of his position in Salish Village for intruding into our life, and on behalf of his buddy President Dulis seducing my estranged wife, and thus destroying of our marriage in order to discredit her in the planed lawsuit against his buddy.

I want to know whether the Salish Village property owners are OK with the fact that the Salish Village is managed by the individuals that act as only the common villains and sexual predators would do. I have a good reason to believe that my estranged wife wasn’t only woman that was sexually harassed by those two individuals, and that it is possible that being encouraged by our unwillingness to accept their disgusting actins some other women could come forward.

* * *

However, there is also still the unresolved issue of our lease, and it appears to be imperative that this issue must be resolved immediately.
Based on the notification by the McCue & Associates Inc that managed the Salish Village property, you called me on November 25, 2008 regarding to my planned petitioning of the Salish Village property owners, and regarding to my website that should inform them about our disgusting experiences with President for Salish Village Condominium Association Craig Dulis and maintenance manager Carl Mason.
Beside of the other talking, you also told me that our lease is unenforceable because the long-term lease that exceeds one year, as our, must be registered with the State. And our lease is not. Also, the signatures on our lease must be notarized. And they are not. Therefore, our lease is invalid and we are actually on month-to-month tenancy. You have also indicated that since I have a problem with those two above-mentioned individuals, it wouldn’t do any good if we would coexist here in the ill will. Therefore, (in my words) I should pack and go.

This came to me as a double shock. Firstly, because neither my estranged wife, nor have I created this regrettable situation, but those two individuals acting like sexual predators and common villains did. Moreover, I’m not doing anything illegal, and you don’t have any reason to change or terminate our lease based on technicalities. Therefore, it would be profoundly unfair that I should go, and those individuals that wickedly screwed our life should stay.
Secondly, because my estranged wife and I have signed with you the 5-year lease agreement written on the standard Lease/Rental Agreement form that you have prepared for signing, and we have signed this lease in the good faith that as a real estate agent you know what is required for such a lease agreement to be legally valid. Believing that we have a valid 5-year lease with you, we, but especially I, have putted great amount of work into your condominium.
Therefore, I have expressed my strong disagreement with such resolution of the problem that I didn’t create, and I told you that I would definitely not accept such resolution and would take a legal action if it would be necessary. However, you told me you are happy to have us as the lease/tenants, and that you are just passing on me the information that you have received from the McCue & Associates and that you actually don’t know what are the legal requirements for the 5-year lease to be legally bounding.
We had continued in our discussion at the same day evening, and you agreed that our, or my, problem with President Dulis and manager Mason is strictly our private matter, and had reconfirmed that you are happy with our 5-year lease, and with us as your tenants, and that don’t have any reason or intention to change it. Eventually, we agreed that both of us would do the further research on this issue, and in cooperative effort will do all necessary to bring the lease to the legally valid state without changing its content.

Next date on November 26, you call me again, and we had over an hour and half long conversation regarding our lease agreement and my intention to take the President Dulis and manager Mason to the court of public opinion. Since my telephone wasn’t working very well, you have come to my unit in person and we continued there in the well over two hours long face to face discussion on those issues. Nonetheless, it still wasn’t completely clear to any of us (or at least to me) what are the actual legal requirements that would make the lease legally bounding. So, we again agreed to do the further research and to take all necessary steps that would bring our lease to the legally bounding state without changing its content.

Based on that, I have done some more research and have found that the agreements regarding the real estate properties are governed by the laws that derived from the old English laws, and that the legal standards in the real estate field deviate from the American standards that apply to the other issues. Here is what I have found:

  1. Our lease agreement is written at the standard Lease/Rental Agreement Form 68, and on the upper portion of the first page is written. “If this Agreement is for a term of more than (1) year, the legal description of the Property will be attached as Exhibit A.” Initially, when we were signing the lease with you, I was satisfied because to our lease agreement is attached the form 68A that describes the condition of the property and I had considered this form as the Exhibit A. However, my current research reveals that the Legal Description of the Property has its own strict rules and requirements that have to be followed.
    The following is the excerpt from the article concerning the Legal Description of the Property. The article focuses on sale of the property, but the Legal Description of the Property is same in lease or sale.

    Excerpt - A legal Description of Property
    In State of Washington, certain statutes relate specifically to the conveyance of real property. Per RCW 64.04.010 and RCW 64.04.020, every conveyance of real property must be in writing, and it must be signed and acknowledged by the party to be bound (i.e. the party selling or otherwise conveying the property).
    A contract for the conveyance of land must contain a description of the land sufficiently definite to locate it without relying on other evidence. Therefore, when drafting a purchase and sale agreement, it is imperative to include the legal description and not just the property’s address. Any serious buyer or seller needs to include the legal description from the contract’s inception.
    In most instances, the legal description is based on the lot, block and subdivision of the property. A typical legal description for a home “Lot 15, Block 21, Gilman Park Addition, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, Page 40, Records of King County, Washington.” Where the home was not built as part of a subdivision, the legal description may reference a government survey or use “metes and bounds,” a method of describing the property with reference to landmarks, angles, and distances.
    To obtain a legal description, you can turn to the preliminary title commitment or a previous deed of the property (which is usually available online at the King County Recorder’s Office).
    The MLS form purchase and sale agreement widely used in Seattle includes language indicating that the legal description can be included after creation of the contract by the buyer’s agent, the seller’s agent, or the escrow agent. However, until the legal description is included, there is no contract, and either party can walk away. Therefore, it behooves any serious buyer or seller to include the legal description from the contract’s inception.
    <== End of Excerpt.


  2. I have already told you about the requirements in RCW 64.04.010 and RCW 64.04.020, and it is imperative that all long-time documents should be notarized. Since the 5-year lease is a long-time document, it is imperative that should be notarized.

Unfortunately, during entire our hours-long conversation, you were expressing your strong disagreement with my plan to take those two disgusting individuals Craig Dulis and Carl Mason to the court of public opinion. You agreed with me that all what they done to my estranged wife, and to me, is a private matter, but you couldn’t see any reason why you, and the other homeowners, should care at all about their rotten ethics and about their completely disgusting action. You have pointed that all homeowners are happy with them, because during their management of Salish Village the property values there had considerably increased. In the other words, the money and profit is what only counts, and destruction of our marriage, and the heavy damage that they done to our lives don’t matter at all.
It was my understanding that, according you, I should simply accept that my wife becomes adulterous, and that she becomes adulterous because she was unsatisfied in our marriage for some private reasons. Therefore, the fact that she becomes adulterous with the manager Mason is meaningless; because once when she has the itch to be adulterous, she would be adulterous with some other man anyway. However, from my point of view, this version is unacceptable, because we were happily married for 11 years and during our marriage she assuring me that she is happy that she has me as her husband. Also, she never expressed any disappointment or the desire to leave me until the manager Mason intruded into our life. Moreover, she eventually admitted that she is in love with him, and that she would not leave me if he wouldn’t be around (to me it means if he wouldn’t mingle with her).

As much as I agree with you that this all is our private matter, I strongly disagree with you that my action against President Dulis and manager Mason is unfair to the other homeowners in Salish Village, because it would draw them to our private matter and could decrease the property value there. President Dulis and manager Mason grossly abused the power and authority given to them by the homeowners in the Salish Village for satisfying of their pervert and predatory desires.
Therefore, the Salish Village homeowners should also decide whether they would tolerate such behavior of the top positioned individuals there. They, however, couldn’t make any decision on this issue, when they don’t know what is going on here. For this reason, it is absolutely mandatory to inform them they have in their close neighborhood two individuals that act as just the sexual predators and worse villains would do, and until they would be contained, no other woman and no other marriage is safe in the Salish Village. Since the McCue & Associates Inc that managed the Salish Village property have failed to do that, and refused any cooperation with me in this manner, I am forced to do that all just on my own.

Unfortunately, you appear to be not happy at all with my decision, and in addition to your previous suggestion that I should pack and leave, you have also indicated that you would not pursue me if (in my words) I would jump the lease, and would easily re-lease your unit to some other party. In other words, you don’t have interest to bring our lease to the level on which should be. You may be right that re-leasing of your unit wouldn’t be a problem for you, although I could see the signs “For Lease” behind the windows of the other units here for many months, and this indicates that these units remain un-leased for the long time.
Nonetheless, your easygoingness also tells me that at any time of your convenience you may decide to walk away from our lease, rather than to allow me to pursue those two individuals for what they done to my estranged wife’s and to my live

The situation that resulted from their despicable acts is still fluid, and could develop in the most unexpected ways. During our conversation, we went through many possible scenarios, but regardless of the outcome I have to deal with it the one-step at the time.
The one of the positive but obviously unintended consequences of McCue & Associates’ action is that we both now know that the lease that we have signed has to be fixed in order to be legally obligatory. We have assured each other that in the cooperative effort we will do all necessary to validate the lease without changing of its contend.

I am passing on you the facts that I have found, and urge you to cooperate with me on this issue.

  • The first step should be to contact the McCue & Associates, and get from them detailed information about the requirement for registering of the long-term lease with the State, and how it should be done. They came up with this requirement, so they should know on which law or rules is based and how to proceed.
    This is what you have to do, because they wouldn’t speak with me. For them I’m just a tenant, and therefore Mr. McCue doesn’t even consider me as a human being that is worth to talk to. Offensively rudely, he told me told me that talking with me is just wasting of his and his employees’ time.
  • Second step is to obtain from the King County Recorder’s Office online, or from the other reliable source, the Legal Description of the Property. The description should contain all required elements spelled the excerpt that I’m sending to you. Since you are the owner and know the basic property specifications, this step could be best done by you.
  • Third step should be to notarize the entire Lease Agreement. We could go to your or my bank and have the Notary Public to notarize the lease.
  • Since neither of us knows for sure what are the legal requirements for the long-term lease that we have already signed in the good faith, the fourth step should be to let the lawyer to review our corrected lease and to ratify its completeness. This step we could take together.

Based on our conversation I believe that it is not your intention, or your deceptive strategy, to keep me stuck with the invalid lease that would allow you to walk away from it at any time of your convenience. Therefore, I’m willing to cooperate with you on the legal validation of our lease 24/7.
However, if you wouldn’t be willing to finalize the validation of our lease by the end of this week, December 6, 2008, I would need to hire the lawyer on my own and let the judge decide what should be done in this matter. If this should happen, I will also ask the court for the reimbursement of my expenses.

But I hope that this wouldn’t be necessary, and we would continue in our good lessor - lessee relationship. Please, call me, or e-mail me or visit me at any time.

Sincerely,
Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 02, 2008 11:17 AM
To:  Oli & Wendy Glenn

Oli:

That's a long email with a lot of comments, issues, opinions, interpretations of what was said... so it's hard to respond fully or try to clarify all aspects of what was discussed. You have misinterpreted things I said but I don't think it's practical to attempt to correct or clarify your interpretations.

Here's how I see it.

1. We have a lease agreement that we are both happy with the terms of.

2. From what I can discern, the Landlord/Tenant laws are structured to give tenants (not landlords) protections from being forced into long-term leases. In the event a tenant were to move out early (prior to lease expiration) the law would not allow the landlord to go after the remaining commitment under a long-term lease. Since I have no desire or intention to shorten the term of our lease and nor do you, I don't think there's much of an issue. A court would protect you either way -- allowing you to enforce the full 5 years or walk early without being stuck to pay the remaining commitment. I don't see where there is any downside to you.

3. I have asked for clarification from McCue as to any further elements needed in our lease to specifically comply with any/all SV rules. Preliminarily, there do not appear to be any issues. This is not a major/pressing matter for them so I won't be surprised if it takes awhile for them to circle back with me to confirm their preliminary comments.

4. The SV HOA have retained McCue to perform accounting, recordkeeping, mailing... services on behalf of the HOA. They have no obligation and, in fact, are likely precluded from rendering any direct assistance (e.g. legal advice) to any individual unit owner. So that is not a service I can/should expect to receive from them.

5. Carl may have stirred up the pot some at McCue by sticking his nose in your & Wendy's business (and may have done so at the behest of Wendy) but at this point, McCue and I are in complete agreement that this matter is strictly between us (as landlord and tenant). McCue only needs to be involved to the extent I end up needing to refile any new document(s) with them.

6. A more significant issue relative to our lease agreement is the impact of the dissolution of your marriage. Wendy is a party to the current lease and, accordingly, she has both rights and obligations under that agreement. We likely cannot execute a valid/new lease that excludes her as a lessee without her knowledge and express permission. As part of your divorce proceeding, you two will have to come to agreement as to division of assets & liabilities and how you two unravel your joint participation in an array of contracts and legal affairs. It may well be that we can't do anything with the lease until your divorce is finalized. In the meantime, and as I said in item 1. above, we have a lease agreement that we both like the terms of and there's no issue with my intent to abide by that agreement.

As to matters totally unrelated to the question about our lease agreement:

1. If you have any issues with Carl, Craig or others at Salish Village, to the extent that they involve anything with respect to the property, property management, business/operational decisions, HOA rules/rule violations... they need to be run through me. I am the landlord, I am the owner of the unit and it's important that I be the one that follows up on such matters, as appropriate.

2. Issues involving personal relationships and personal matters between you, Wendy and anyone connected to Salish Village need to remain completely separate from any business/tenancy/HOA matters that I, as landlord, need to aware of or involved with. Your & Wendy's personal affairs are just that - personal - and have nothing to do with our landlord/tenant relationship. While it may be tough to keep your emotional angst and your personal issues with Carl & Craig separate from property matters it is imperative that this be done.

3. As to advice I shared relative to the course(s) of action you intend to pursue I was only intending to caution you given your state of anger/frustration. I think you'll agree that there aren't too many "brilliant" ideas (nor outcomes) that are spawned from acting upon one's anger. It was in the spirit of hoping, for your sake, that you don't do something that you will later regret and/or cause further harm to you that I offered this counsel to you. It is my belief that your best chance to attain the outcome you desire will be the result of conducting a disciplined, comprehensive, well-vetted, patiently-executed plan.

Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 02, 2008 9:25 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Kirkland December 2, 2008

Chris:

It is really unfortunate that you have inserted yourself into the regrettable semi-private issue that involves the insulting and profoundly crooked sexual harasser President for the Salish Village Condominium Association Craig Dulis and the equally crooked and deceptive womanizer maintenance manager Carl Mason on one side, and my adulterous wife and me on the other. Since they acted as they did in their work-time, and in their work environment, and from their professional position, their despicable actions inevitably involve the Salish Village Condominium Association and the property owners.
THIS IS HOW IT IS, AND YOUR ATTEMPTS TO FOOL ME AND COERCE ME COULD NOT CHANGE IT EVEN A BIT.

But remember that I wanted to leave you out of this mess, and that it wasn’t me who contacted you in this matter! It was you, who on November 25, 2008 contacted me on behalf of those two villainous individuals , and informed me/threatened me that our lease is invalid. Ironically, if our lease is invalid, it is only because there are missing some components that you have neglected to include there. Regrettably, you have used this twist on blackmailing me, coercing me, and paralyzing me in order to prevent me to take those two above named villainous individuals to the court of public opinion.
You also told me that since we don’t have a valid lease; our status is actually month-to-month tenancy that could be terminated by the 30 days notice. You tried to divert me from my planed action to pursue those two above named villainous individuals , and then you tried to intimidate me by the blatant suggestions that I should pack and leave based on 30 days notice, that I should give you and you would accept it!!!

Therefore, your repeated statements that we both are happy with the terms of the contract that my wife and I have signed with you is absolutely meaningless, and emphasizing of our yesterday, and your today, happiness with our contract is false and deceptive. Convinced that we have bounding and legally sound 5-year lease, I have putted a great amount of work into your unit. But on November 25 you simply told me that it is not so, and that based on technicalities (that you have neglected or deliberately hadn’t included) you could walk away from our contract at any time you want.

Then, you started backpedaling and promised me that you will do some research on it. Then, after your alleged research, you tried to deceive me by the nice talking and by the verbal assurances that everything is actually OK.
However, my follow-up research revealed that our contract is not OK, as you were misleading me, because some minor but crucial technicalities, as including of the truth Legal Description of the Property as exhibit “A” and notarization of our signatures have to be done. At the time of signing the lease with you, we believed you are a professional in the real estate field, and that the attached form 68A is actually the exhibit “A” that is explicitly required for the contract longer than 1 year, as it is indicated on the face page of our lease.
Deplorably, after I have found that it is not truth, and that the Legal Description of the Property is not the form 68A as you told us, then instead of correcting these issues promptly, or in the term of one week, you refuse to make those corrections.
This means, that after six months, and after I have fixed your unit for free, you are walking away from our contract and want to have us in your unit based on just the month-to-month tenancy that you can revoke with 30 day notice at any time.
Chris, I have considered you as the honest man, but what you are doing now exceeds all limits of common decency. It also reflects on your human quality as well as on your professional integrity. If not from you as from a decent human being, I would expect a lot more from you as from the agent and employee of the Coldwell Bankers Company. This emerges as the issue that I’d need to look into.

You are absolutely correct that my wife is a party to the current lease and, accordingly, she has both rights and obligations under that agreement. I definitely agree with you that, under any circumstances, she shouldn’t be excluded as a lessee. However, she also shouldn’t be given the opportunity to walk away from the lease agreement that she co-signed just based on some technicalities, and thus avoid the full responsibility for her part.
Outrageously, in addition to your attempt to coerce me, and to intimidate me because of my planed action against those two above-named villainous individuals , you assume the right to interfere into my wife’s and mine divorce proceeding.
We both have signed the lease agreement with you in good faith that is technically and legally correct, but you openly try to create the situation that would allow her to use your distorted tactics and avoid her obligations steaming from our lease agreement.
Since it is obvious that the current form of our lease agreement that you have produced is not enforceable and/or admissible in the court of law for division of our assets & liabilities, your unwillingness to put this lease into the proper technical order inflicts the further damage on me.

As to your patronizing me and to your attempt to portray me as a foolish angry man, I have to advice you that I’m a mature man, and I had already been through many stressful events throughout my life. Therefore, I do not appreciate your suggestions that I act as a desperate, emotionally unstable angry man, when I strive for justice and for punishment of those two crooked individuals with whose you are clearly siding. I could be your father, and I truly do not appreciate your mentoring me, or patronizing me as you are doing so in the very last paragraph of your letter.

As to your and McCue’s attempt to fragmentize my effort to bring those two above named villainous individuals to justice, I need to tell you following. Although my wife’s adultery, and our subsequent divorce is strictly our private affair, the fact that Craig Dulis is President for Salish Village Condominium Association, and Carl Mason is maintenance manager there, and that both used their work-time and their superior professional positions given to them by the Salish Village homeowners on the gross intrusion into our lives, and on the consequent destruction of our marriage, makes matter inseparable from Salish Village matters.
Both abused their position in Salish Village, and therefore I’ll not let you to derail me, and to paralyze me by fragmenting of their despicable acts on the toothless fragments that would be harmless for them. Like it or not, I will deal with this situation as whole and as proper.

As I said at the beginning, I was keeping you out of this mess. However, if you insist that my wife’s/my multifold problem with those two above named villainous individuals that happen to hold two top positions in the Salish Village must be run thorough you, then, in addition to all what I am intending to do, I would also file the formal complaint on those two villainous individuals with you. If this is what you want, then just tell me I’ll do that immediately.
Since you are clearly siding with them, and vehemently try to undercut me, the great of the mess that they created would fall at you as well. This would also create a whole new issue of the landlord - tenant dispute, and based on the Washington State laws and King County rules, your possible future adverse action that you’d take against me would be retaliatory and would need to be dealt with appropriately. Also, this would become a major part of my story that I’m working on, and will soon start widely publish and promote. In fact, I’m already considering including there even your current coercive and deceptive treatment of me and my struggles with you over fixing of the lease. If we should go to court, then, regardless of the outcome I’ll publish this part of my story anyway.

In our today morning telephone conversation you told me that you have the Legal Property Description on hand, but have repeatedly refused to include this description to our lease as the Exhibit “A,” as it is pre-printed on the face page of our lease agreement. Since this Legal Description, is required by law as the condition for validity of the lease, I and you have failed (intentionally or unintentionally) to include this description there, and had repeatedly told me that you will not do that as I have requested you, I will not wait until Monday as I wrote you in the previous e-letter and will act immediately.

Here is what I will do. Tomorrow, I’ll contact an attorney, and will ask him, or her, to evaluate our lease agreement.
If it’d turn that the lease is legally bounding and enforceable even without the elements in question, then we have no issue and I’ll pay for attorney’s fee from my pocket.
If, however, the lease wouldn’t be bounding, or enforceable, or wouldn’t be admissible in court (for instance during my divorce proceeding) as is, then I will ask the attorney to write you a letter spelling the legal requirements, and will deduct the attorney’s fee from our/my next rent. If you’d disagree with this deduction, then we would have a new problem on hand, and we would need to resolve it based on the current - landlord tenant laws.
If you would continue in refusing to fix the items specified by the attorney immediately, then I will file the lawsuit against you for all reasons that the attorney would suggest. And, of course, I’ll also file for the reimbursement for all fees and expenses.

Please, contact me immediately if you have any other acceptable resolution of the problem.

Sincerely,
Oli Glenn

LEASE VALIDATION - OPPFELT SHOWED TO BE A PUFFY SHYSTER

WHILE GROSSLY ABUSING THEIR POSITIONS IN SALISH VILLAGE, THE SEXUAL PREDATORS, EMBEZZLERS AND RACKETEERS DULIS AND MASON TOOK THE INDECENT ADVANTAGE OF OUR STRESSFUL SITUATION THAT OCCURRED DUE TO OUR FORCED RELOCATION, AND SHORTLY AFTER WE HAD MOVED THERE THEY COMPLETELY SCREWED MY AT-THAT-TIME WIFE.

WHEN I HAVE BEGAN PURSUING THEM, I ALREADY KNEW THAT THEY ARE SPINELESS AND DANGEROUS CREEPS, AND I ALSO WAS WELL AWARE OF THAT THE WHOLE ISSUE IS BETWEEN THE SALISH VILLAGE WHICH THEY REPRESENT, AND BETWEEN MY WIFE AND ME.   AT THAT TIME, I WAS STILL THINKING THAT THE LANDLORD OPPFELT IS AS NICE AS HE PRETENDED TO BE, AND I DIDN'T WANT HIM AT ALL TO BE INVOLVED INTO MY WIFE'S AND MINE FIGHT. 
HOWEVER, INSTEAD OF STAYING OUT OF IT, HE FORCED HIMSELF BETWEEN THEM AND US, AND BEGAN INTERFERING INTO MY STRIVE FOR THE JUST RESOLUTION OF THE DEPLORABLE SITUATION THAT THEY CREATED.  EVENTUALLY, HE BECAME SCREWING ME ON THEIR BEHALF, AND LATER WAS EVEN PLOTTING WITH THEM AGAINST ME AND INSTIGATED MY AT-THAT-TIME WIFE AGAINST ME. 
IT WAS ONLY AFTER HIS, NOVEMBER 26, 2008, THREATENING PHONE-CALL, AND AFTER HIS FOLLOW-UP BLACKMAILING VISIT IN MY APARTMENT, WHEN I HAVE REALIZED THAT HE IS A PROBABLY PATHOLOGIC BUT DEFINITELY PUFFY LIAR, AND ON TOP OF THAT IS ALSO A DESPICABLE AND TWISTED CREEP.  

AND OF COURSE, WHEN I HAVE, IN THE PREVIOUS LETTER, THREW TO HIS FACE THE FACTS THAT HE COULDN'T DENY, HE REACTED IN HIS PUFFY, AND IN FACT INSULTINGLY DEGRADING WAY.  ALL OF THE SUDDEN, HE BEGAN DEMANDING THAT I SHOULD COMMUNICATE WITH HIM ONLY THOSE THINGS WHICH ARE PERTINENT TO OUR LANDLORD-TENANT RELATIONSHIP.  (SEE THE LETTER BELOW.) 
HOWEVER, HIS DEMANDS ABOUT THE COMMUNICATION PERTINENT EXCLUSIVELY TO OUR LANDLORD-TENANT RELATIONSHIP DIDN'T STOP THIS BLOODY SHYSTER OF BLACKMAILING ME, AND OF DEMANDING THAT I SHOULD STOP PURSUING THOSE TWO CREEPS DULIS AND MASON.  HE SQUALLED THAT UNDER THEIR MANAGEMENT THE VALUE OF HIS PROPERTY IN SALISH VILLAGE CONSIDERABLY ROSE, AND REFUSED TO ACCEPT THE INEVITABLE FACT THAT IT HAPPENED NOT BECAUSE OF THEM, BUT BECAUSE OF THE INSANE HOUSING BUBBLE THAT WAS JUST ABOUT TO BURST. 

BUT BEFORE IT HAPPENED, AND HE WAS FORCED TO SHUT UP, HE BECAME CLAIMING THAT MY 5-YEARS LEASE WITH HIM IS INVALID, AND THEREFORE I'M SUBJECTED JUST 30 DAYS NOTICE TO VACATE.  BEING UNDER ENORMOUS STRESS CREATED BY HIM, AND BY THE LOUSY McCUE & ASSOCIATES THAT MIS-MANAGED THE SALISH VILLAGE FROM OUTSIDE, I WAS FORCED TO SPEND $375 ON ITS PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION, WHICH PROVED THAT THE LEASE IS PERFECTLY VALID, AFTER ALL. 
THEN, WHEN HE COULDN'T BLACKMAIL ME BY THE ALLEGED INVALIDITY OF THE LEASE ANYMORE, HE REFUSED TO FINISH FIXING OF THE ISSUES WHICH HE PROMISED TO FIX, AND BECAME FORCING ME OUT OF THE SALISH VILLAGE BY THE ILLEGAL "CONSTRUCTIVE EVICTION."  WHEN EVENT THIS DIDN'T WORK, HE, AND HIS BUDDIES DULIS AND MASON, COERCED MY AT-THAT-TIME WIFE TO PURGING OF HERSELF IN THE COURT, AND WANTED TO SET ME FOR JAIL.  WHEN EVEN THIS DIDN'T WORK, HE ATTEMPTED TO KILL ME, AND AS TO THIS DAY CONTINUES IN HIS ATTEMPT TO CAUSE MY UNTIMELY DEATH.

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 03, 2008 9:19 AM
To:  Kamarech

Hi Oli:

I am unable to read your latest email. I asked you to respect our landlord - tenant relationship with regard to communicating with me only those things which are pertinent to this relationship. I also asked that you cease communicating with me anything that is not pertinent to this relationship. You can reread my email of yesterday with regard to this.

Sorry,

Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 03, 2008 11:06 AM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Kirkland December 3-2008-

Chris:

I don’t understand what you mean by "I am unable to read your latest email," and I'm puzzled by the fact that your strange response is written on the same page as my e-mail.
Also, I am not sure what you mean by "I asked you to respect our landlord - tenant relationship with regard to communicating with me only those things which are pertinent to this relationship. I also asked that you cease communicating with me anything that is not pertinent to this relationship."

Regardless of what you mean by your above statements, let me remind you, once again, that I didn't contact you about my wife's and my issues with President for Salish Village Condominium Association Craig Dulis and maintenance manager Carl Mason. YOU WERE THE ONE WHO CALLED ME REGARDING THESE ISSUES, tried to coerce me, and eventually threatened me by the invalidity of our lease, and by my vulnerability resulting from my alleged month-to-month tenancy that according you I currently have!
Moreover, the allegedly invalid lease to your unit in the Salish Village that you have produced as the licensed professional in the Real Estate field, and made my wife and me believe that we could trust you that everything is done in professional manner, that is very much very much pertinent to our landlord - tenant relationship!

Since you said that you couldn’t read it, I'm re-sending you the e-letter that I sent you yesterday. I would appreciate if you would tell me whether you have some better but acceptable resolution of our allegedly invalid lease issue, and would explain your strange e-message that you sent me today.

Thank you,
Oli Glenn
From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 03, 2008 9:00 PM
To:  Kamarech

Oli:

I am unable to read your earlier email as it is not in keeping with my earlier instructions. Specifically, I asked you to respect our landlord - tenant relationship with regard to communicating with me only those things which are pertinent to this relationship. I also asked that you cease communicating with me anything that is not pertinent to this relationship. You can reread my email of yesterday with regard to this.

In regards to your latest email message, again, let me refer you to my earlier email (Item 6.under "Here's how I see it:" in that email). Until all three parties to the current lease are in agreement as to further action that should be taken with respect to the current lease, no action can or will be taken. Just as soon as you, Wendy and I can meet and mutually agree on any needed/desired revisions, if any, I will be happy to follow through and take care of them. The only other qualifier I can think of is that I may also need assurances from whoever will be representing each of you and handling the legal matters connected with your marriage dissolution that such revisions are consistent with what you two have agreed to in that proceeding.

Again sorry,

Chris

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 05, 2008 4:37 PM
To:  Oli & Wendy Glenn

Oli:

Just a heads up on where things are at:

I sent an email into McCue & Associates a few days ago and explained the over-arching complication (with Wendy being out of the country) and how we are thusly not in position to concurrently agree to changes in the lease agreement -- even if you and I both appear to have no problems with such changes. I haven't heard anything back so I presume at this stage that they understand the impact of this complication.

It's possible that if you had a specific power of attorney in place you could evidence her concurrence without her being present. The only qualifier to this would be that I'd want to confirm with whomever is representing her in divorce proceedings that they have no problem having you acting on her behalf in this manner and relative to the lease. I respect that your divorce is an entirely private matter but I have to take added precaution not to do anything that puts me somehow in the middle of what either of you prefers to accomplish.

I still have not heard back from McCue regarding my request for any other specific requirements that the SV HOA declarations/rules & regs say I need to incorporate into a lease. As I mentioned earlier, it could take a little while before I get affirmative response on this.

I also conveyed that you and I are both still happy with the lease terms and intend to continue to abide by them as and until Wendy is available for us to meet and make any appropriate changes (or as may be desired/necessary arising from a divorce settlement). Obviously, I have some right to agree or not agree to desired lease changes that stem from divorce (e.g. removing one of the parties from the lease) but so long as your tenancy is in good standing (and there's reason to believe it will continue in such manner) I would expect to be able to be cooperative.

I am out of town this weekend and will be off email.

Take care,

Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 05, 2008 8:18 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Chris:

I am acknowledging your e-mail, and stipulate that I have no intention to make any changes to our lease, specifically not to exclude my wife, unless it would be ordered by the court during the division of our assets and liabilities.

Oli

From:  Illtreated
Sent:  December 08, 2008 9:48 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Chris;

As you may know, bereavement, divorce, loss of the home/moving, and change of the long held job are four most stressful events in human life.
In addition to the raw deal that I have received in Salish Village from Dulis and Mason, and from my estranged wife, yours and McCue’s treats, coercion and scare tactics that I have recounted in my e-letters from December 1, 2, and 3, caused me enormous stress and also a lot of money.
Nonetheless, now I at least know that the lease that my wife and I have signed with you is perfectly valid and is enforceable as is. Therefore, neither McCue, nor you, could threaten me, blackmail me, and paralyze me any longer by the false suggestions of invalidity of my lease, and by the 30 day notice to vacate that could result from my alleged month-to-month tenancy status that according you I have now, if I would pursue those two disgraceful individuals Dulis and Mason that you protect.
Also, now I know exactly what I could, and couldn’t do in my case against those two individuals, and possibly against the Salish Village Condominium Association as the entity responsible for their actions. And I’ll do it all, step by step.

However, today I need to resolve with you the maintenance issues steaming from the landlord - tenant relationship and from our contract.

  1. The persistent smoke issue; although I have sealed everything I could, the cigarette smoke from the unit below still comes to my/your unit. As you know, I have severe breathing problems, and the smoke coming from the neighboring unit aggravates my health problem. During the winter months, when I have to keep the windows closed, the problem of incoming smoke is eminent. My doctor suggests that I should contact the WS Lung Association, and the other organizations, and ask them for help in forcing of my landlord to fix the problem. He also gave me some telephone numbers and addresses. Before I would do that, I would like to know what you, as the landlord, could voluntarily do in this issue.
    SUGGESTION: The replacement of the carpet floor in the hallway (through which smoke seems to be infiltrating to my/your unit) by some solid floor, could help to eliminate the problem.
  2. The floor replacement in the hallway; from June 2008, you have changed your plan several times. At first, you wanted to put there ceramic tiles, or the imitation of the hardwood floor to both the hallway and the storage room.
    Then, you said that it would be too expensive, and wanted to replace the damaged carpet by the hardwood imitation floor in the hallway only, and leave the storage room as is.
    Then, you said that it would be too expensive, and wanted to replace the damaged carpet by the other carpet in the hallway only. You told me that you have the suitable carpet on hand, and I agreed that I’d hire the professional carpetter who would replace it, and at the same time would do some small job in your home. However, to hire the carpetter willing to do a split job have showed to be difficult, and this issue have stretched way too long and needs to be resolved soon.
    SUGGESTION: If you want to use the carpet that you have on hand, please hire the carpetter by yourself and let him replace the damaged carpet in the hallway immediately. Alternatively, bring your carpet to my/your unit and I’ll hire the carpetter to do the job and would deduct his price from the next rent. You may want to know, however, that some businessmen would put the hardwood imitation floor to the hallway, in compliance with the KC housing code, for the price that doesn’t exceed too much the price that you would need to pay for the carpet replacement. Some solid floor would probably do better job in preventing of the smoke to go through, and would also increase the value of your property.
  3. The two-way light switch for the hallway: You agreed that I should re-wire the switch in the living room to be useful for turning on and off the light in the hallway. To do this job, I would need: 2pcs of two-way switch; 22’ of three-wire cable that is allowed by the code to be run outside of the wall; 25 clamps for attaching of this cable to the wall, and the sealant for sealing of the holes that I have to drill to the wall on the site opposite to the current switches.
    The question is, whether you would buy the material, or you want me to do that and extract the price from the next rent.
  4. The drain in the bathroom sink: The drain there was always slow, but is getting increasingly slower. I believe that the Draino or the other drain opening solution would do the job. The question is, whether you would buy something that would open the drain, or you want me to buy it and extract the price from the next rent.

Please, let me know your position on all issues soon.

Oli Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 09, 2008 9:31 AM
To:  Oli & Wendy Glenn

Oli:

Please revise your communication to me. I stopped reading this message after the first paragraph because it contained comments about your personal affairs which I have specifically requested you to keep me out of and/or comments which, at least as relates to me, are simply not true. I am sensitive to the stressful situation you are in but there is no reason that we cannot extend appropriate respect to one another. I look forward to reestablishing a healthy landlord-tenant relationship and dialogue.

Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 09, 2008 6:18 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Kirkland, December 9-2008-

CHRIS:

I have respect for you as for my landlord, and I'm old enough to know that everybody could make a mistake or could do some regrettable things. So, believe it or not, I still have respect even for you as for a fellow human being. This, however, couldn't stop me to describe the things as they are, and to name them as they deserve. That is my right, and under any circumstances I will not allow you to take it from me!
My statements in the first paragraph of my previous message reflect the passed reality, and are truthful; and you know that. However, if you want to, then start reading my previous message from the second paragraph to the end, where deals exclusively with the maintenance issues.
It cost me lot money to find that our lease is perfectly valid and enforceable after all! So, please stop treating me as a puffy 17-century lord, and start reestablishing of the healthy landlord-tenant relationship by cooperating on the practical issues that have to be resolved in your interest as much as in mine.
If, however, you'd prefer to deal with the issues related to the maintenance of your unit, and with the other issues related to my wife's and mine occupancy of your unit in the Salish Village in the other way, then we would need to do that.

Oli Glenn

OPPFELT DEMANDS MY WIFE'S CONTACT INFORMATION

ON MY URGENT ADVICE, MY AT-THAT-TIME WIFE LEFT THE COUNTRY FOR HONDURAS, AND SHOULD STAY THERE IN THE ASSUMED SAFETY OF HER PARENTS HOME UNTIL THE TRIAL WITH THE SEXUAL PREDATOR DULIS, OR UNTIL OUR DIVORCE; WHATEVER WOULD COME FIRST.  HOWEVER, WHEN THOSE TWO CREEPS DULIS AND MASON REALIZED THAT DESPITE OF THEIR WICKED EFFORT TO DIVIDE US WE CONTINUE IN PLANNING OF THE LAWSUIT AGAINST PREDATORY DULIS, THEY DIDN'T WASTE ANY TIME AND RUSHED TO HONDURAS TO FURTHER BRIBE HER, AND TO COERCE HER THERE TO THE COOPERATION ON THEIR WICKED PLAN TO GET RID OF MY BY SETTING ME FOR JAIL. 

ON DECEMBER 10, 2008, OR SHORTLY BEFORE, THE SHYSTER-LANDLORD OPPFELT LEARNED ABOUT THEIR PLAN AND BECOME DEMANDING THE CONTACT INFORMATION ON MY WIFE.   HE INSISTED THAT HE MUST BE IN TOUCH WITH HER BECAUSE SHE IS A COSIGNER OF THE LEASE.   AT THAT TIME, I ALREADY KNEW THAT HE IS A TWISTED SHYSTER, BUT I DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT THEIR WICKED INTEND TO COERCE MY WIFE TO THE PARTICIPATION ON THEIR PLAN.  AND, IN FACT, I WOULDN'T EVEN BELIEVE THAT HE IS A LOWLIFE OF SUCH A MAGNITUDE AND WOULD BE WILLING TO GO SO LOW. 

HIS REASONING SEEMED TO MAKE A LOGIC SENSE, SO I GAVE HIM THIS INFORMATION UNDER THE CONDITION THAT ANY PARTY SIGNED ON THE LEASE, OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVES, WOULD BE OBLIGATED TO SEND THE CC OF THE COMMUNICATION WITH THE OTHER PARTY TO THE REMAINING PARTY.  HOWEVER, HIS DEMAND WAS JUST A DIRTY TRICK, AND ONLY LATER I HAVE LEARNED THAT HE ACTUALLY WANTED TO MESS-UP WITH MY WIFE AND INSTIGATE HER AGAINST ME ON DULIS' AND MASON's BEHALF. 
EVENTUALLY, HE REFUSED TO GIVE ME THE CC OF HIS ILLICIT COMMUNICATION WITH HER, CITED IT AS HIS PRIVATE, AND MOCKED ME INSTEAD.   DUE TO HIS CREEPY ACTIONS, HE BECAME LARGELY RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR DISFRANCHISEMENT, AND FOR THE CONSEQUENT DAMAGES THAT RESULTED FROM DESTRUCTION OF OUR PREPARED BUSINESS VENTURE.

From::  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 10-2008-9:48 AM
To:  Kamarech

Good morning Oli:

Given that there are three parties to our lease (Wendy, you and me) and that you & Wendy may have disparate interests in this agreement, any further communication between landlord and tenant must include all parties to the lease. To that end, please share with me contact information for Wendy and anyone who she has chosen to represent or advise her in regards to her legal interests & affairs.

For Wendy - mailing address, phone number and email address are needed.

For Wendy's legal counsel (if she's retained someone) - name, address, phone number & email address.
It's up to you to as to how you may choose to keep your legal counsel informed and up-to-speed in regards to any future landlord-tenant matters.

Including Wendy (and, where appropriate, her counsel,) simply as "cc's" on future emails may work fine depending on the nature of the landlord/tenant matter being raised. I am confident that we can work together to balance the needs for timely action/response with appropriate awareness/concurrence among the parties to our agreement.

I do look forward to restoring a healthy & positive landlord - tenant relationship.

Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 10-2008-9:28 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Good Evening Chris;

It sounds fair, provided that any party signed on the lease, or their representatives, would be obligated to send the CC of the communication with the other party to the remaining party . If this shouldn't be a case, then except of the maintenance and occupancy issues that are governed by the appropriate RCWs and King County Rules, such a piece of communication would be invalid and would be returned to the original sender. Unfortunately, I don’t know Wendy's new address in the U.S.A., but Mr. Mason knows it and may be willing to give it to you. As far as I know she is currently in Honduras, but I don't know her home address there either. I have only her cell-phone number 425-449-0805 that she was using in the U.S.A., and her email address beruska75@hotmail.com that I have used for communicating with her a while ago. Since we don't have the lease agreement issues anymore, I hope that it would be sufficient.

Looking forward to restoring of our landlord-tenant relationship, and suggest that we should start from the maintenance issues listed in the four points of my e-message to you from December 8, 2008 9;48 PM. The good news is that it may not be necessary to pull the new wires for the hallway light after all, because the preliminary look revealed that the wires might be there, but somebody reconnect them in the most impossible way. The bad news is that the garbage disposal in the kitchen is rusty, and is worn-out to such a level that doesn't work properly anymore. It would need to be replaced, but you might want to take a look at it first.

Oli Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 11, 2008 9:45 AM
To:  Kamarech ; beruska75@hotmail.com

Hi Wendy:

Please read the email string below. Since you are a party to the lease agreement for my condo unit at Salish Village I have realized that you need to be kept informed of any & all communications that involve landlord - tenant matters. If you are indeed out of the country I am hoping that email communication will work. If you have anyone in Seattle who has been appointed your legal representative we can keep them informed as well -- just share with me their contact information. I hope you are well.

Please ping us back so that we know we can stay in touch via email. Thank you Wendy.

Oli:

Please resend the email you refer to below to both me and Wendy so she is made aware of the landlord tenant-matters that you raised.

If you want to share with Wendy any/all other previous emails that we have exchanged over the past few weeks you are free to do so. Just cc me on any such emails so I know which ones she has received and which ones you have elected not to share.

Thank you Oli.

Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 11, 2008 11:22 AM
To:  Beruska75 ; Chris Oppfelt

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 11, 2008 9:45 AM
To:  Kamarech ; beruska75@hotmail.com

Hi Wendy:

Please read the email string below. Since you are a party to the lease agreement for my condo unit at Salish Village I have realized that you need to be kept informed of any & all communications that involve landlord - tenant matters. If you are indeed out of the country I am hoping that email communication will work. If you have anyone in Seattle who has been appointed your legal representative we can keep them informed as well -- just share with me their contact information. I hope you are well.

Please ping us back so that we know we can stay in touch via email. Thank you Wendy.

Oli:

Please resend the email you refer to below to both me and Wendy so she is made aware of the landlord tenant-matters that you raised.

If you want to share with Wendy any/all other previous emails that we have exchanged over the past few weeks you are free to do so. Just cc me on any such emails so I know which ones she has received and which ones you have elected not to share.

Thank you Oli.

Chris

IN ADDITION TO THIS MESSAGE, I HAVE FORWARDED HER ALL CORRESPONDENCE EXCHANGED WITH MR. OPPFELT.

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 12, 2008 2:50 PM
To:  o o
Cc:  Oli & Wendy Glenn

Wendy:

Good to hear from you.

I don't have the authority on my own to release you from the lease. You have both contractual rights as well as contractual obligations in connection with the lease and I may have to defer to whoever is going to handle divorce proceedings between you and Oli as to what is mutually agreed to between you two as you legally separate all your affairs.

As of now, Oli is still intending to remain in the unit for the remaining duration of the lease and is paying the monthly rent on time. We will continue to keep you informed of any landlord - tenant discussions as and until you can be officially released from the agreement.

Hope you are doing well in Honduras.

Chris

THE SMOKE HAZARD - ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTIVE EVICTION

THE SHYSTER-LANDLORD OPPFELT DECLARED HIS UNIT AS NONE-SMOKING, AND PROHIBITED US TO SMOKE THERE, OR TO LET ANYBODY ELSE TO SMOKE THERE.   THIS WAS JUST FINE WITH US, BECAUSE MY AT-THAT-TIME WIFE, AND I, HAVE SERIOUS BREATHING PROBLEMS AND WOULD NOT ALLOW ANYBODY TO SMOKE THERE ANYWAY.  HOWEVER, SHORTLY AFTER WE HAD MOWED IN, WE HAVE REALIZED THAT HIS UNIT IS LIKE A SMOKEHOUSE, BECAUSE THE NEIGHBOR BELOW IS A HEAVY SMOKER AND THE SMOKE FROM HIS UNIT CAME TO OUR APARTMENT. 
THE BLOODY OPPFELT WAS COOPERATIVE IN FIXING OF THIS, AND OF THE OTHER REMAINING PROBLEMS,  UNTIL HE LEARNED THAT I WOULDN'T YIELD TO HIS BLACKMAILING, AND WOULD CONTINUE IN PURSUING OF HIS CREEPY PROTÉGÉS DULIS AND MASON.   THEN, IN VIOLATION OF HOUSING LAWS, AND THE AMERICAN PERSONS WITH DISABILITY ACT, HE STOPPED DOING THE PROMISED MAINTENANCE AND REFUSED TO FINISH FIXING OF THE SMOKE PROBLEM.  TO MAKE THE THINGS EVEN WORSE FOR ME, HE EVEN PROHIBITED ME TO FIX THESE PROBLEMS ON MY OWN. 

AT THAT TIME, THIS CREEP ALREADY COOPERATED WITH DULIS AND MASON ON THEIR WICKED PLOT THAT SHOULD BRING ME TO JAIL, AND THIS WOULD GIVE HIM THE LEGIBLE REASON FOR REVOKING OF MY LEASE.  SO, AS THE REASON FOR STOPPING OF THE PROMISED MAINTENANCE, WHICH HE IS OBLIGATED TO DO BY LAW ANYWAY, HE CITES IN HIS MESSAGE, BELOW, THAT MY TENANCY WOULD BE COMING TO END FAIRLY SOON AND THEREFORE THERE IS NOT ANY POINT TO DO THE PROMISED REPAIRS. 
FROM THIS POINT, HE PRACTICES A SYSTEMATIC "CONSTRUCTIVE EVICTION," WILLFULLY UNDERMINES MY HEALTH, AND EVEN ATTEMPTED TO KILL ME.

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 12, 2008 11:23 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Kirkland December 12, 2008

To: Chris Oppfelt
13028 NE 32nd Place, Bellevue WA 98005

Dear Chris:

When we were signing our written lease agreement, you agreed that it would be OK for us to have a small pets in your unit, as long as it would be in compliance with the Salish Village rules, and I agreed that I would do the light repairs in your unit and you would pay only for the necessary material that I’d extract from the next month rent.
However, in the closer examination of our lease agreement I couldn’t see those two items recorded there. They both were agreed on at the same time, therefore I’m asking you to confirm or deny them in writing as the undividable pair. A simple but clear statement would be fine.
If you choose not to do so, then our written agreement would be the only valid and enforceable agreement, and our verbal agreement on both above-mentioned items would be void.

Sincerely,
Oli Glenn
12406 NE 130th Ct, Unit J206
Kirkland, WA 98034

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 13, 2008 1:38 PM
To:  Oli Glenn
Cc:  Wendy Glenn

Oli:

Regarding the maintenance issues you have brought to my attention:

I cannot offer you a fail-proof solution for the cigarette smoke/odor that you have noted in the unit. We have worked hard to remedy the situation but clearly there are no other obvious points of entry that can be reliably remedied. Replacing the hallway carpeting and installing baseboards in the hall are very unlikely to change airflow into or out of the unit. The smoking that is going on in an adjoining unit is legal and thus I don't have any leverage to cause it to cease.

If your physician has advised you to avoid exposure to cigarette smoke/odor, you need to heed that advice. Since I cannot guarantee a fail-proof solution in my unit, your best course of action is to relocate to a residence where such condition can be assured. Regardless of the lease agreement we have in place and my desire to retain you as a long-term tenant, your health is of paramount importance. I will cooperate fully as you seek a residence that meets your health needs. Given that there are rental properties that are entirely non-smoking and there are others that have been built to different construction standards such that air flow between units is not really possible, you should have good success finding an appropriate solution for you.

I can drop off some drain cleaner and take a look at the garbage disposal in the next few days. Further, since your tenancy will be coming to end fairly soon there's really no point having you make any changes to the electrical wiring to enable two-way control of the hallway light.

Since Wendy expressed her desire to be removed from the lease in her earlier email, I don't think there could be any legal issues arising from a "health-justified" early termination of the lease vis-a-vis your divorce proceedings.

Keep me posted on your search & move timing.

Chris Oppfelt

Residential & Investment Specialist
Pacific Crest Group/Coldwell Banker Danforth
425-891-4592 (Cell)
425-883-1486 (Fax)

COMPLAINT TO HUD - CONSTRUCTIVE EVICTION CONTINUES

BEING NOT ABLE TO HAVE THE BLOODY SHYSTER-LANDLORD OPPFELT TO FULFILL HIS LANDLORD'S DUTIES, AND BECAUSE HE BAREFACEDLY CONTINUED IN MY "CONSTRUCTIVE EVICTION, I HAVE FILED THE COMPLAINT ON HIM WITH THE HUD.   HOWEVER, SHORTLY AFTER I HAVE LEARNED FROM THE HOUSING EXPERT THAT THE HUD IS JUST ANOTHER CRAPPY ORGANIZATION AND O TOP OF ALL PROTECT THE LANDLORDS.  I WAS ALSO TOLD THAT NOTHING WOULD HAPPEN WITH MY COMPLAINT, AND IT REALLY DIDN'T.

THIS GAVE TO THIS BLOODY SHYSTER OPPFELT EVEN MORE COURAGE TO BRUTALLY VIOLATE MY TENANT'S RIGHTS.

From:  complaints_office_00@hud.gov
Sent:  December 14, 2008 4:07 PM
To:  complaints_office_00@hud.gov; illtreated@hotmail.com; complaints_office_10@hud.gov
Subject::  HUD-903.1 Internet Form Thank you for your support.
We received your inquiry on December 14, 2008 7:07 PM.

HUD - Confirmation of reception of my complaint below. 

What Happened:
I'm 64 y/o, and I'm permanently disabled primarily because of my lungs problem. On May 24, 2008, my wife and I have signed the 5-year lease with Mr. Chris Oppfelt, on his 1br condominium unit in the Salish Village, and on June 1, 2008 we moved there.
But from the middle of July, 2008, President for Salish Village Condominium Association Craig Dulis and the maintenance manager Carl Mason converted out tenancy there to the living hell.
First, Mr. Dulis had some kinky remarks on my wife, then he assaulted me because of my age and become sexually harassing her. Then, he verbally assaulted her because of her unwillingness to provide him with demanded sexual favor, and both of us because of our national origin and our creed. Then, Mr. Mason became seducing my wife mainly in order to discredit her in her planned lawsuit against Mr. Dulis. Eventually they bribed her by the large amount of hash money, and moved her out of the Salish Village.
I have asked for help our landlord Mr. Oppfelt and have wrote the rough draft describing the raw deal that we have received in Salish Village and published it on Internet. Instead of helping us to get some justice, he told me that the money are more important than our problems, and joined those two disgusting individuals because they allegedly increased the property value in Salish Village.
From that time, our previously nice landlord threatens me; intimidates me; blackmails me; attempts to coerce me; retaliates against me; reduces and refuses his cooperation in the maintenance issues; discriminates against me because of my disability; harasses me; and hassles me in many other ways. Despite of that he hypocritically says that he wants me to continue in my long-time tenancy, he forces me out of his unit. Moreover, he refuses to correct the remaining easily correctable smoke problems that inflict the further damage to my health, and that he before promised to correct.

Why:
I'm positive that President for Salish Village Condominium Association Craig Dulis sexually assaulted my wife of 11 years and then assaulted her also verbally because he:
a) Considers her of being an inferior race;
b) Because of her national origin;
c) Because of her creed - her cultural, political, and ethical values that she holds, and that don't match with his loose morals and with his chauvinistic nature;
d) Because she married a much older man;
e) Because he considers us both defenseless immigrants and believed that he will go away with his degusting actions easy.

I'm positive that President for Salish Village Condominium Association Craig Dulis verbally assaulted me because of:
a) My age;
b) My national origin;
c) My creed - my cultural, political, and ethical values that I hold, and that don't match with his loose morals and with his chauvinistic nature;
d) My disability - my presumed vulnerability resulting from my permanent disability;

I'm positive that the manager for Salish Village Condominium Association Carl Mason intruded into our marriage, steeled Salish Village resources, bribed my wife by the large monetary gift(s), and violated the common law and all norms of decency because he:
a) Presumed my vulnerability resulting from my age;
b) Presumed my vulnerability resulting from my permanent disability;
c) Presumed my vulnerability because of my national origin;
d) Wanted to discredit my wife in her planned lawsuit against his buddy Mr. Dulis
e) Wanted to take sexual and the other advantage of her;
f) Wanted to protect (in his deceiving way) his buddy Mr. Dulis with whom he is, based on my observation, closely tied by the shabby deals that they make on expense of the Salish Village homeowners.

It is inevitable that our landlord Mr. Chris Oppfelt threatens me; intimidates me; blackmails me; attempts to coerce me; retaliates against me; reduces and refuses his cooperation in the maintenance issues; discriminates against me because of my disability; harasses me; and hassles me in many other ways because:
a) I'm encouraging my wife to don't be fooled anymore by Mr. Mason's monkeyshines, and to not feel obligated to stay silent because she accepted a minimum $1,100 of hash money from him (obviously provided, at least partially, by Mr. Dulis);
b) To take the legal action against President for Salish Village Condominium Association Craig Dulis, and intend to join her in the planed lawsuit;
c) I have uploaded the rough draft detailing my wife's and my terrible experiences in the Salish Village on the WWW at the address http://salishvillage.com.
d) Intend to develop this site, and notify all Salish Village homeowners about our raw deal, and about the unsustainable situation that President for Salish Village Condominium Association Craig Dulis, and the maintenance manager Carl Mason created there;
e) If this wouldn't help, then promote the above mentioned website on the large scale and take the Salish Village Condominium Association to the court of public opinion;
f) If this wouldn't help, then take the Salish Village Condominium Association to the court of law.

Respondent:Chris Oppfelt
Organization:Landlord
Address:13023 NE 32nd Pl, Bellevue, WA 98005

Where did it happen:12406 NE 130th Ct, Unit J206, Kirkland WA 98034
When:13-dec-2008
Is it continuing:Yes

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 14, 2008 8:28 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Kirkland December 14, 2008

To: Mr. Chris Oppfelt, landlord

Dear Chris:

I’m really sorry that, as you told me, the money and increase of value of your unit that you, in my opinion, falsely credit to the allegedly exceptional management of Salish Village by those two individuals Mr. Dulis and Mr. Mason that act like sexual maniacs and the hard core villains, is more important for you than the fact that they grossly abuse their authority, destroyed my life, and brought the enormous stress and suffering on my wife and me.
I’m also sorry, that instead of striving for the fair and rightful resolution of the hideous situation that they created, you have joined them and have engaged into deplorable actions against me that effectively ended our previously pleasant landlord-tenant relationship.

In addition to the monetary damage, you have already inflicted on me much too much of stress and suffering in retaliation for my taking of the necessary steps against those above mentioned individuals that you protect. Now, instead of making the promised repairs that would prevent the smoke to come to your/my unit and the further damage my health, you continue to hassle me by the shortening of my tenancy.
Seeing that your malicious actions against me intensify, I have already taken the first legal steps to protect myself against your abuses of the landlord-tenant relationship by filing my complaint on you with the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. You’ll hear from them soon,
Since you refuse to make the previously promised repairs, and instead you are treating me in the sneaky and completely disgusting way, I’ll bring the lawsuit against you if necessary.
For now, however, I’m bringing to your attention the excerpt from the Smoke Free Washington site, and urge you to take the closer look at RCW 59.18.060, RCW 59.18.070, The Fair Housing Act, The Americans with Disability Act, Maine Human Rights Act, and the other applicable rules and laws that I intend to use.

Excerpt
Believe it or not, you actually put yourself at risk for legal liability if your property is not designated smoke-free. There are several ways you could be held liable by tenants if you do not have a smoke-free policy, including:
Common Law Theories. These are ways non-smoking tenants can bring legal action against you the landlord or against smoking tenants under common law.
- Breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment
- Negligence
- Nuisance
- Breach of warranty of habitability
- Battery
- Intentional infliction of emotional distress
- Trespass
- Constructive eviction
Americans with Disabilities Act, Fair Housing Act, and Maine Human Rights Act. Non-smoking tenants who are afflicted with breathing disorders may use the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Fair Housing Act, or the Maine Human Rights Act to bring legal action against landlords for not making reasonable accommodations to protect these tenants from secondhand smoke in common areas or in their apartments.
<== End of excerpt

Because you frequently retract the promises that you made before, and our recent correspondence is only disturbing and completely fruitless, I’ll limit my communication with you to absolute minimum. Because I believe that you want to exploit my serious heart problems, and want to inflict on me the maximum stress and suffering that would cause the further damage to my health, or could even cause my early death, I will deal with you preferably through the institutions and organizations that are here to protect my rights.
Moreover, and will post my experiences with you, and all our previous communication, as the part of my website that I’m currently developing at http://salishvillage.com.

Sorry that I don’t have for you a better news,
Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 15, 2008 9:27 AM
To:  Kamarech
Cc:  Beruska75

Hi Oli:

I am unable to read your latest email. I asked you to respect our landlord - tenant relationship with regard to communicating with me only those things which are pertinent to this relationship. I also asked that you cease communicating with me anything that is not pertinent to this relationship. You can reread my previous email instructions with regard to this.

Sorry,

Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 15, 2008 10:45 AM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75
 

WHATEVER YOU WISH CHRIS!

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 16, 2008 9:54 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Kirkland December 16, 2008

To: Chris Oppfelt, landlord
13023 NE 32nd Pl, Bellevue, WA 98005

From: Oli P. Glenn
12406 NE 130th Ct, Unit J206, Kirkland, WA 98034

Dear Mr. Oppfelt,

Today at 10:54 AM, you called me and asked me how I’m doing. I asked you back, how you think I’m doing in the given situation. Dolorously, as your response, you have attempted to test on me the old trick designed to discredit and disarm anybody who opposes you, and had immediately accused me of being angry, allegedly because I have responded you in this way. So, I told you that I’m not angry but frustrated, and determined to defend my rights and dignity and asked you to stop your repeated attempts to portray me as an old angry man.
Then, you started reviving the issues related to despicable treatment to which my wife and I had been subjected from President Dulis and manager Mason, although you didn’t want to hear about them when I have spelled them out for you in my previous e-mails. Regrettably, you have always responded me that you can’t read my e-mail, but today you suddenly wanted to talk about them over the phone.
We were talking for a half hour, and I could see that you just circle around and use your extraordinary eloquence on talking me out of my intended actions against those two above mentioned individuals, and now against you as well. Therefore, I have asked you to not argue on this subject any longer, because it is obvious that we are not able to resolve our dispute, and the third party that have the authority to do so would need to get involve.

An hour after we have finished our telephone conversation, you came to my/your unit to check the garbage disposal and brought some Liquid Plummer Gel. Then, you have asked me what we could do to improve our relationship. I told you that I neither do anything illegal nor I demand anything extra, and therefore bringing our relationship back as it was before could be very simple, if:

  1. Stop hassling me by the constructive eviction because I’m taking the necessary steps against President Dulis and manager Mason, and fulfill the maintenance promises that you made from the time when we moved into your unit in June 2008;
  • Remove the old floor cover in the hallway that is just impossible and needs to be replaced anyway, caulk the slot between the walls and the basic concrete floor, as you are promising to do that from the time when we moved in. This would automatically take care of the smoke that infiltrates from the unit below to the hallway.
  • Remove the baseboard heater in the bedroom, from behind which the smoke clearly comes to bedroom, patch the hole around the electric wires in the wall behind that might be so terribly big as the hole that I have discovered behind the hood in the kitchen. Put the heater back, and this would take care about the smoke coming there.
  • Let me reconnect the wires in the switch cases in the living room and in the hallway, that control the light in the hallway, in the way as they were probably before. This would remove the hazard while walking in the dark hallway.
  1. Restrain from any adverse actions against me in the future, when I will pursues the desired remedy in the case of our gross mistreatment by President Dulis and manager Mason.

Unfortunately, my simple request triggered your sharp and ostentatious reaction that resulted into the argument that triggered my asthma attack and increased my heartbeat over 110 pulses (measured after you left). In addition to the other direct and indirect offensive accusations, you have accused me of:
1) Being a trouble maker;
2) Trying to spread my private problems on the Salish Village homeowners;
3) Being not able to prove anything what I have ever said;
4) Lying that I have ever sought a legal advice;
5) Falsely playing with the disability “card”;
6) Demanding from you the things that couldn’t be done;
7) Preventing you to do the before promised maintenance by “playing the hardball”;
8) Deliberately inflicting damage to my health, because I’m refusing to pack and move elsewhere and to bother with my requests somebody else.

Your argumentation, and your ill accusations were outrageous and increasingly angry, and it was obvious that we would not reach the acceptable agreement and the outside authority would need to resolve our dispute. Therefore, I have repeatedly demanded you to should stop arguing about those issues, and let the authorized party to tell us who is right and who is wrong. However, instead of stopping your verbal onslaught, you had continued and introduced each series of your repeating accusations by such statements as “but I just want to tell you that…”
Moreover, same as always, you were patronizing me and were spoon-feeding me by telling me what I should say to my legal advisor; if I have one, or have ever consult any. Quite outrageously, you have demanded that I should give you the address and telephone number of my advisor (to whom I paid $375 for the legal advice) because you want to speak with him or her.
It is clear to me that you either want to force me to stop my legal actions against President Dulis and manager Mason, or to hassle me out of your unit. Moreover, it is clear to me that you, and those who are on your site are worry what could happen to those two individuals, if my wife that still has the legal right to come back at any time she wants, would decide that is worthwhile for her to come back, maybe not as my fife but as a co-occupant of your unit. But repetition of anything like that is simply unacceptable!

Therefore, please note that on 24 hours notice I’m always willing to allow you to come to my/your unit for justifiable reasons, as I’m required to do so by law. However, your coercive and intimidating contentions, and your yelling at me especially when you already are outside the unit, is truly disturbing to me and have severe impact on my fragile health.
For the above reasons I have no desire to get with you into the fruitless verbal argument anymore, and I have to ask you to not open these conflicting issues during our verbal conversation anymore, and conduct all our discussion on this subject in writing if there would be necessity to discuss them at all.

Thank you in advance for your understanding,

Oli P. Glenn

SHYSTER-LANDLORD OPPFELT INCITES MY WIFE AGAINST ME

ON DECEMBER 10, 2008, OR SHORTLY BEFORE, THE SHYSTER-LANDLORD OPPFELT BECAME COOPERATING WITH PREDATORY DULIS' AND MASON's  ON THEIR WICKED PLAN TO USE MY AT-THAT-TIME WIFE FOR BRINGING ME IN JAIL AND BECOME DEMANDING THE CONTACT INFORMATION ON HER.   HE INSISTED THAT HE MUST BE IN TOUCH WITH HER BECAUSE SHE IS A COSIGNER OF THE LEASE.   AT THAT TIME, I ALREADY KNEW THAT HE IS A TWISTED SHYSTER, BUT I DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT THEIR INTEND TO COERCE HER TO THE PARTICIPATION ON THEIR WICKED PLAN.  AND, IN FACT, I WOULDN'T EVEN BELIEVE THAT HE IS A LOWLIFE OF SUCH A MAGNITUDE AND WOULD BE WILLING TO GO SO LOW.

HIS REASONING SEEMED TO MAKE A LOGIC SENSE, SO I GAVE HIM THIS INFORMATION UNDER THE CONDITION THAT ANY PARTY SIGNED ON THE LEASE, OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVES, WOULD BE OBLIGATED TO SEND THE CC OF THE COMMUNICATION WITH THE OTHER PARTY TO THE REMAINING PARTY.  HOWEVER, HIS DEMAND WAS JUST A DIRTY TRICK, AND ONLY LATER I HAVE LEARNED THAT HE ACTUALLY WANTED TO MESS-UP WITH MY WIFE AND INSTIGATE HER AGAINST ME ON DULIS' AND MASON's BEHALF. 
BEING ENCOURAGED BY THE HUD's IGNORING OF MY COMPLAINT, HE BECAME SO IMPUDENT THAT IN ADDITION TO HIS SECRET AND GROSSLY ILLICIT COMMUNICATION WITH HER, HE EVEN AGITATED HER AGAINST ME RIGHT IN FRONT OF MY EYES.  
EVENTUALLY, HE REFUSED TO GIVE ME THE CC OF THIS ILLICIT COMMUNICATION, CITED IT AS HIS PRIVATE, AND MOCKED ME INSTEAD.   DUE TO HIS CREEPY ACTIONS, HE BECAME LARGELY RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR DISFRANCHISEMENT, AND FOR THE CONSEQUENT DAMAGES THAT RESULTED FROM DESTRUCTION OF OUR PREPARED BUSINESS VENTURE.

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 17, 2008 10:24 AM
To:  Beruska75
Cc:  Kamarech

Hi Wendy:

I am not going to attempt to clarify or correct Oli's recap of our discussion of yesterday as it is completely impractical to do so. Since you were not present to hear the actual conversation, suffice it to say that there is a big disconnect between what was said and how it has been summarized below.

I am at a complete loss as to how my offers to cooperate with him in allowing him to relocate to a residence that fully meets his health needs is somehow construed as "constructive eviction". I look forward to working with applicable public agencies and any advisors who Oli trusts and will listen to (e.g. his personal physician, his attorney...) to achieve a rational and fail-proof solution to addressing his health concerns.

I hope you are doing well.

Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 17, 2008 7:00 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

To: Chris Oppfelt, landlord
13023 NE 32nd Pl, Bellevue, WA 98005

From: Oli P. Glenn
12406 NE 130th Ct, Unit J206
Kirkland, WA 98034

RE: As to Your Attempt to Turn My Wife against Me

Mr. Oppfelt,

Your attitude is getting really gross, but also reveals a lot about you. As your reaction on my e-letter, instead of addressing to me, you are addressing your e-mail to my wife and are talking there about me in a third person. This constitutes the clear, and for you as the landlord improper interference to our private affairs!!! This is unacceptable, and I promise you that it would have the proper consequences.

What I wrote you in that e-letter is the exact recap what happened yesterday during your phone call and during your following visit in my household!!! Only, I couldn't capture there some less important details, because you were running your mouth on me in such a rate of speed during your mostly monologue, that it would be enormously long summery if I would capture them all.
Instead, I’ll tell you something else. During our visit in my household on November 26, you were trying to persuade me to let those two villainous individuals that happened to be the top figures in the Salish Village go away with the despicable violation of both my wife and me. November was terribly sad time for me, and I still wasn’t able to cut through the crop. But you wanted me to just simply accept that my wife is adulterous woman, and if she wouldn’t leave me with the manager Mason, she would leave me with some other guy anyway. Once when she is adulterous, she is just adulterous regardless of with whom she goes. I agreed with you, because at that time I didn’t know yet that she (and we both actually) are victims of President Dulis’ and manager Mason’s dirty schema that should discredit her in the sexual harassment lawsuit that we intended to file against Dulis.

But you were not wasting any time, and pushed me hard to stop my effort to bring those two individuals to the court of public opinion. Probably in order to make me tender and complying, you have assured me that you know how I must feel and we begin to discuss the difference between your and my personality. In the obvious attempt to defocus me, you have suggested that the excellent way to get even with the manager Mason would be if I would turn him in to IRS for his tax fraud that he revealed to my wife and to me. Then, I just could sit back and enjoy how he is fried by the IRS and how he struggles with the consequences.
I know that you were just trying to “help” me by your catty advice. However, I told you that I’m a straight shooter, and that it is not my style, and it is also against my culture to operate as an anonym; If I would turn him in, then I’ll do that openly. You were laughing, and told me that it is silly because the most enjoyable is to operate in the sneaky way and as an anonym. I told you that we clearly wouldn’t be ever able to agree on this issue, but that it is how I operate and I wouldn’t change my style.
There was some more collateral talking about this issue, but it doesn’t have importance for now. Important is, that you don’t have enough courage to respond me straight, so you have decided to go in the sneaky way and whine to my wife. There is no doubt in my mind that you hope that she would repeat the same mistake twice, and being blinded by her possible detestation against me she wouldn’t be able to recognize that you play with her the same dirty game as did the sexual harasser Dulis and the deceiving manager Mason. The old proverb says: "Show me your friends, and I'll tell you who you are." It is obvious, that this proverb fulfils itself in your case to a hundred percent.

Since you whine that you are completely lost, I have obviously grossly overestimated your intelligence!!! However, if you are lost, then it is only because you are refusing to do the necessary maintenance, as to replace the flooring in the hallway that you have (both of us) promised to replace and neglect your landlord duties. The flooring there is absolutely impossible anyway, and this, by coincidence, would take care of the smoke problem there. Both my wife and I know it for sure, because replacement of the floor in the bathroom, that you have done because there was a carpet on the floor that couldn't be properly sanitized and there was a mildew issue, and sealing all crannies and slots that I had done there took care of the severe smoke problem in the bathroom. Then, I have also sealed the crannies and slots in bedroom, and only place that needs to be sealed now is behind the baseboard heater there.

However, instead of being cooperative in this issue, which is your legal obligation after all, you are engaging in the constructive eviction that is illegal. You falsely hope that you would somewhat achieve the removal of my wife from the lease, and this would give you the opportunity to terminate it, or to not sign the new lease just with me. But, I need to tell you that my wife could be removed from the lease only by the court order, if she would be removed at all!!! If it should happen, then I will make sure that it would be done in the way that wouldn't allow you to terminate the lease. Until our divorce would be finalized, and it could take years, she has, like it or not, both the right and obligation to that lease and you couldn’t changed it by any of your sneaky tricks.

Unfortunately, it seems that being blinded by the desire of a vendetta or punishing me for my intend to take your two protégés to the court of the public opinion, you have completely lost the sense of reality and of your landlord duties. You have forgotten that my wife knows me for 11 years, and that we had been together through a lot. So she knows exactly who I am, and what I stay for.
Moreover, you have also forgotten that she suffered by the smoke coming to our unit as much as I did, and that she was there when you made your promises to replace the flooring in the hallway, and to seal there everything. In addition, I have all e-mal that we have exchanged on this issue, in the case if her memory would go wrong.
Although you don’t know her personality, and her sense for right and wrong, you fiddle with her in hope that her desire to be removed from the lease would flip her on your side and that she would help you to get read of me.
But you have also forgotten that the last word would have the judge during our divorce proceeding, and would decide about her obligations to me, as to the co-lessee, but it wouldn’t de-validate the lease itself by any mean.

Sincerely,
Oli P. Glenn

P.S.
It wouldn’t surprise me a bit if you wouldn’t be able to read this letter.
From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 17, 2008 7:32 PM
To:  Beruska75
Cc:  Kamarech

Good evening Wendy:

Sorry to trouble you with this...but only want to go on record again to make sure that you aware that I cannot begin to correct the inaccuracies and misinterpretations contained in Oli's latest email and that it is of no use to even try.

Oli and I agreed to keep you in the loop as it relates to landlord-tenant matters. I had no intention of responding to Oli's email -- which is why the earlier response was directed to you -- but only thought it important that you understood my perspective.

I haven't read the latest email in its entirety, nor likely will I, as again and despite my repeated requests, Oli appears incapable of separating his personal issues and affairs from those that involve true landlord-tenant matters.

Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 17, 2008 10:55 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Kirkland December 17, 2008

To: Chris Oppfelt, landlord
13023 NE 32nd Pl, Bellevue, WA 98005

From: Oli P. Glenn
12406 NE 130th Ct, Unit J206
Kirkland, WA 98034

Dear Mr. Oppfelt,

Since I’m not arrogant, I have read the CC of your e-message that you addressed to my wife to the end, and I read it carefully.

And yes, although I am an analyst by training, and by profession, and spent a good part of my life on analyzing of the complex processes, and on writing of reports about them, I have to admit that I’m puzzled by what, according you, in our situation is the landlord - tenant issue and what is not. So far, it doesn’t matter how I slice it, it looks to me that when it is convenient for you then it is, but when it is not convenient, or you don’t have a good answer, then it is not.
However, perhaps you would be so kind and would help me to understand how it works.

  • I like to know, why the maintenance as replacement of the broken carpet, and the smoke problem that harms my health are not tenant - landlord issues, especially when the laws, as well as the lawyer specializing in the real estate field, say that they are.
  • If indeed they are not tenant - landlord issues, then I like to know why you have promised to my wife, and to me, that in joined afford, you, and I, would take care of them, and why we did so only partially and now you refuse to continue. I couldn’t understand what has changed that prevents you to keep your word and to continue in what we have started.
  • I like to know, why the sexual harassment of my wife, and gross insults of my wife, and me, because of our national origin and creed by President Dulis, and the theft, plotting, and deceiving with the malicious intend by manager Mason don’t include into the landlord - tenant issues, especially when they happened in their work time and on the Salish Village property.
  • If indeed they are not the landlord - tenant issues, then I like to know why Mr. McCue, and you (initially), insisted that whatever I’d do in those issues, then everything must go through you.
  • Perhaps most importantly, if they are not, then I like to know why you are sticking your nose into them and constantly hassle me because of them.

I apologize for being so dumb, but as I have learned from President Dulis I’m just a Communist brainwash, and with my low level of intelligence I don’t even belong to the United States of America. So, if you would be so kind, and would spend your valuable time on reading of my e-mail to the end, and would spend still a little more time on explanation of those five points, it would really help me to understand to your position and to your way of thinking. This, in turn, could definitely improve our landlord - tenant relations.

However, until then, please note that I’m addressing you Mr. Oppfelt, and that Oli call me only my friends and those who are in good relations with me. Unfortunately, you are currently not one of them.

Sincerely,
Oli P. Glenn

OPPFELT'S ZIGZAGGING AND HIS CYNIC MOCKERY

THE SHYSTER-LANDLORD OPPFELT REACTED ON MY PERSISTENT AND STRAIGHTFORWARD DEMANDS FOR EXPLANATION OF HIS PREVIOUS MALICIOUS ACTIONS, AND OF HIS ARROGANT IMPERTINENCE, BY ZIGZAGGING AND BY THE NEW WAVE OF HIS CYNIC MOCKERY.

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 18, 2008 9:22 AM
To:  Kamarech
Cc:  Beruska75

Oli:

I have already provided you with written explanations on every item you list below. I have reread my written explanations and I can't come up with a clearer way to restate them. I am at a loss as to how I can help resolve your confusion.

Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 18, 2008 11:42 AM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Mr. Oppfelt!

Would you, please, point me to at least a one your written explanation on the items in my last e-message? I'm striving to improve our landlord - tenant relationship, and it would really help me to re-read it. Unfortunately, it is obvious that you either didn’t read my e-letter closely, or with the arrogant ignorance disregard what I wrote you, because you continue to addressing me using only my first name although I have asked you to not do so. Please, note that I do not appreciate it.

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 18, 2008 6:26 PM
To:  Kamarech
Cc:  Beruska75

I don't comprehend how there could be any confusion regarding how I have already responded.
From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 18, 2008 7:49 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Mr. Oppfelt!

I'm sorry that I'm, obviously, not too bright. So, despite of that you don't comprehend how there could be any confusion regarding how you have already responded, would you, please, point me to at least a one your written explanation on the items in my e-message from Wednesday, December 17, 2008 10:56 PM? I'd truly appreciate your help.

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 19, 2008 5:29 PM
To:  Kamarech
Cc:  Beruska75

I am anticipating that by virtue of your filing a complaint against me with the agency you mentioned (Office of Fair Housing) a mediation process will commence. I think it would be wise to hold off on further dialogue or action until such time as an intermediary is involved. If you want to suggest another qualified intermediary other than someone assigned by the government, let me know.

Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 19, 2008 8:33 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Mr. Oppfelt:

Hmm, it looks to me that you can't answer my question, so you are zigzagging, But as usual, you must say something in order to just say something. You have inflicted on me a lot of stress, pain, and suffering during the last two months, and there wouldn't be other mediator but the government agencies, one by one, and eventually the court if necessary.

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 19, 2008 9:01 PM
To:  Kamarech
Cc:  Beruska75

I have already answered your questions which is why I have no interest in having to repeat myself. Again, Oli, I am really looking forward to working through an intermediary so sit tight and wait if you would please. I will let you know when they contact me and we can go from there.

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  December 20, 2008 12:12 AM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Mr. Oppfelt:

Please, point me to at least a one your written explanation on the items in my e-message from Wednesday, December 17, 2008 10:56 PM. Secondly, am asking you, again, to not address me by my first name!!! Next time, I'll consider it as a deliberate degradation and malicious harassment, and it would have all legal consequences for you.

Oli P. Glenn

FORMAL COMPLAINT ON DULIS AND MASON - OPPFELT's MOCKERY

AFTER THE LOUSY HUD IGNORED MY DECEMBER 14, 2008 COMPLAINT ON THE SHYSTER-LANDLORD OPPFELT AND ON HIS TWO CREEPY PROTÉGÉS DULIS AND MASON, I HAVE BEGAN SEARCHING FOR THE EFFECTIVE LAWYER THAT WOULD REPRESENT ME IN THE COURT.

FORMAL COMPLAINT ON PRESIDENT DULIS AND MANAGER MASON - INITIAL INFORMATION - COMING SOON

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  December 20, 2008 12:15 AM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Kirkland December 19, 2008

To: Chris Oppfelt, landlord
13023 NE 32nd Pl, Bellevue, WA 98005

From: Oli P. Glenn
12406 NE 130th Ct, Unit J206. Kirkland, WA 98034

RE: Formal Complaint

Based on the stern recommendation given to me by Mr. McCue, Chairman of the McCue & Associates Inc. on 17 148th Ave. SE, Bellevue, WA 98007 that manages the Salish Village property, and based on the advice by my legal counselor, I am filing with you this complaint on President for Salish Village Condominium Association Craig Dulis and on maintenance manager Carl Mason as follows.

I’m filing the formal complaint on Mr. Dulis for:

  1. Violent, insulting, and threatening behavior during his visit in our unit;
  2. Repeated degrading of my wife because of her age and my age;
  3. Repeated degrading of my wife because she married the man of my age;
  4. Repeated insulting of my wife because of her national origin;
  5. Repeated insulting of my wife because of her creed;
  6. Repeated sexual harassment of my wife;
  7. Conspiring with Mr. Mason against my wife with the malicious intend to discredit her in the planed lawsuit against him for sexual harassment and insults;
  8. Conspiring with Mr. Mason against my wife with the malicious intend to antagonize her with me, and thus prevent us both to go-ahead and file a joined lawsuit against him for insulting us because of our national origin and creed.
  9. Repeated insulting of me because of my age;
  10. Repeated insulting of me because I have married a younger woman;
  11. Repeated insulting of me because of my national origin;
  12. Repeated insulting of me because of my creed;
  13. Conspiring with Mr. Mason against me with the malicious intend to antagonize me with my wife, and thus prevent me to support her in her lawsuit against him for sexual harassment and insults;
  14. Conspiring with Mr. Mason against me with the malicious intend to antagonize me with my wife, and thus prevent us both to go-ahead and file a joined lawsuit against him for insulting us because of our national origin and creed.

I’m filing the formal complaint on Mr. Mason for:

  1. Theft of the Salish Village paid services;
  2. For misusing of his work-time on the side-job for Mr. Dulis and some other Salish Village homeowners;
  3. For misusing of his work-time on improper and subversive communication with my wife, that lead to our divorce;
  4. Abusing of the Salish Village computer system and Internet connection on improper and subversive communication with my wife, that lead to our divorce;
  5. For conspiring with Mr. Dulis against my wife with the malicious intend to discredit her in the planed lawsuit against Mr. Dulis for sexual harassment and insults;
  6. For conspiring with Mr. Dulis against me with the malicious intend to separate me from my wife, and thus deprive her of my support in the planed lawsuit against Mr. Dulis for sexual harassment and insults;
  7. For sneaky intrusion into our marriage with the malicious intend to discredit my wife in the planed lawsuit against Mr. Dulis for sexual harassment and insults;
  8. For bribing my wife by at least $1,100.00 of hash money;
  9. For brainwashing of my wife and for physically removing her from her home in the Salish Village, with the malicious intend to separate us and thus prevent us to support each other in the planed lawsuit against Mr. Dulis for sexual harassment and insults;
  10. For malicious intrusion into my wife’s, and mine, private life and causing the irreversible destruction of our marriage;
  11. For retaliating against me, by disconnecting me from the Salish Village Internet connection that he provided for us before, after I have discovered that he bribed and corrupted my wife, and that he is in adulterous relationship with her.

In addition, from June 2008 to October 2006, I have observed that Mr. Mason abused his manager position in Salish Village, and with knowledge of President Dulis was taking advantage of the Salish Village homeowners that need to do some repairs or improvements. Initially, he offered them a reasonable estimate, but eventually overpriced them. Then, such a homeowner faced to a dilemma whether should dispute the increased price and gain the dangerous enemy in Mr. Mason, or should just swallow and just pay the increased price.
At that time, I have also observed that Mr. Mason and Mr. Dulis occasionally exchanged the large amount of cash, and I believe that it was a cut for Mr. Dulis for allowing manager Mason to do his shabby business in the Salish Village. When the money flew in the opposite direction, I believe that it was President Dulis’ payment to manager Mason for the complete reconstruction of his unit that he was doing for him during his regular work-time.
Moreover, I have also observed that Mr. Mason frequently used his work-time for the repairs, and for the complete reconstruction of the units for the other homeowners, as for instance for the unit in the building across the yard, East from our unit.”

  • On May 24, 2008, my wife and I have signed the 5-year lease with you for the 1br condominium unit in the Salish Village on 12406 NE 130th Ct, Unit J206, in Kirkland WA 98034, and on June 1, we moved in.
  • In the middle of July, 2008, being probably drunk, the President for Salish Village Condominium Association Craig Dulis verbally assaulted me, and publicly humiliated me because of my age (I’m 64) in correlation with the age of my wife (she is 34). It was embarrassing and humiliating experience for both of us. But because he is a top figure in the Salish Village, and we were new tenants there at that time, rather than to pursue him for his assault we were trying to get on good terms with him.
  • However, on July 31, 2008, he was probably high on drugs (as he told us), and during his visit in our unit began sexually harassing my wife and completely blatantly demanded a sexual favor from her. We both were outraged, and gave him a polite but stern warning that neither of us would tolerate such behavior of his. When he didn’t stop, we showed him the door.
    This upset him so much, that he hit our glass dining table by the closed fist so hard that it was just a miracle that he didn’t break it, and started yelling a number of insults and slurs at us. When he was slowly leaving, he continued in insulting us by such statements, as for instance that we should go home from where we came from, that we don’t belong to America, and that I’m a Communist brainwash and the product of Communist system. He was yelling those and the other insults even when he was already out of our unit on the outside stairway.
  • My wife is a Honduran and I’m a Czech descent, but we both are long-time U.S. citizens and the United States of America is our home. Mr. Dulis’ disgusting secession left us very disturbed, and my wife immediately wanted to file the sexual harassment lawsuit against him. However, we were living in the Salish Village just two months at that time, and during that time we put a lot of hard work into your unit. Beside it, we have the 5-year lease signed with you. Therefore, we were truly decimated and were not sure what would be the best for us to do.
  • Few days later, when we felt that Mr. Dulis slanders us and uses his position of President in the Salish Village on turning the other residents against us, I sent you the complaint letter, informed you what had happened, and asked you for advice in this matter.
  • On August 13, in your e-message you have recommended that we should just let it go. I have inclined to follow your advice, but my wife was terribly upset and fell betrayed. Consequently, this and the previous experience with President for the Salish Village Condominium Association Mr. Dulis left a deep scar on our relationship.
  • My wife still wanted to file the sexual harassment lawsuit, and the maintenance manager of Salish Village Mr. Carl Masson, the good buddy of Mr. Dulis (with whom, based on my observation, he is tied-up by the shady business that they are doing together), pretended to be a friend of ours. He sharply denounced Mr. Dulis for his despicable behavior, and under pretense of friendship become brainwashing and seducing my wife, in order to discredit her in her planed lawsuit against President Dulis.
  • He abused the Salish Village computer system, and used the Salish Village resources, as for instance the Internet connection that he stole for the purpose to gain the illicit access to my wife and improper communicating with her. He was doing that during his office-time, and after his work hours he was frequently coming to our home and abused our friendship in order to secretly mingle with her.
  • On October 8, he eventually succeeded in seducing of my wife to such a level that she asked me for divorce. He didn’t waste any time, and on October 10 moved her to the new place that he arranged for her. He also gave her at least $1,100.00 hush money, and continued in the adulterous relationship with her after she left her home and was out of the Salish Village. But at that time, both Mr. Mason and my wife were still denying to have any relationship.
  • However, a month later my wife finally admitted that she is in love with Mr. Mason, and hoped that she would have a child from him. However, in the abut same time, I have begun to see through the “smoke,” and have realized what kind of dirty game Mr. Dulis and Mr. Mason play with both of us. I have cautioned my wife that Mr. Mason told us that he is an ex-convict, and that it is obvious that he uses his deceptive mind on playing of the dirty game with her on behalf of his good buddy President Dulis. I had strongly advised her to go at least for a while to live in the safety of her parents’ house in Honduras, and when she left, I have become pursuing those two individuals for the raw deal that they brought at us. When Mr. Mason realized that it wouldn’t be so easy scheme as he thought, and on top of that wouldn’t have any physical enjoyment with my wife, he dumped her in hurry.
  • As you know, I have wrote the rough draft describing the raw deal that we have received from President Dulis and maintenance manager Mason in the Salish Village, and have published it on Internet at http://salishvillage.com and http://salishvillage.com. Beside that, I intend to send the note to all 170 homeowners in Salish Village, inform them briefly what is going on their property, point them to my website for more information, and ask them to expel those two individuals from their positions in Salish Village.

In contrary with yours and Mr. McCue’s opinion, I hold that Mr. Dulis and Mr. Mason represent the Salish Village Condominium Association around the clock (while they act on the Salish Village property). President Dulis abused his official authority on sexual harassment of my wife, and illegally insulted both of us. Manager Mason grossly abused his position of maintenance manager , illicitly used the Salish Village work-time, and the equipment, in order to gain the improper access to my wife. Therefore their actions are not just a private matter, as you and Mr. McCue try to persuade me, and, over all, their actions and behavior is not just unacceptable but it is also illegal.
Moreover, I believe that the Salish Village property value rose during their management due to the 2001 - 2007 housing bubble, and even if would rise because of their exceptional management, as you told me, it couldn’t be, and shouldn’t be used as the excuse for their despicable and illegal actions.
I also believe that if those two profoundly crooked individuals, acting like common thieves and sexual maniacs would be left unchecked, then no other women, and no other marriage or relationship in the Salish Village would be safe.

Therefore, I expect nothing les from you but your prompt and decisive action leading to the containing and proper punishment of those two individuals. Please, let me know if you would need some additional information.

Sincerely,
Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 20, 2008 8:20 AM
To:  Oddbuster
Cc:  Beruska75

Please provide me contact information for your legal counselor. Your complaint, as written, is not actionable.

Chris

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  December 20, 2008 3:48 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Mr. Oppfelt:

Your request is arrogant and utterly ridiculous on its face. For now, you are dealing with me, as with your tenant that filed with you the complaint that alleges serious violations that happened at your property. What you think about my complaint, and how you will act on it, that's entirely your choice. When time would come, my trial lawyer, and the judge, will tell you whether or not my complaint was actionable and you would be dealing with consequences. Therefore, I would suggest you to hire, and pay, your own legal advisor and don’t try to mingle with mine for whom you didn't pay for.

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 20, 2008 4:50 PM
To:  Oddbuster
Cc:  Beruska75

Why would you not welcome & encourage the opportunity for a dialogue between me and your trial lawyer now versus delaying resolution until later? That is a perplexing stance to take given your eagerness.
From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  December 21, 2008 1:18 AM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Kirkland December 21, 2008

Whatever you say, Mr. Oppfelt: You frequently insult me by your accusations of being and angry old man that just could swallow that my adulterous wife eventually left me, and wants to retaliate on the Salish Village homeowners and thus hamper your profit; that I'm emotional and mentally unstable; and now you are insulting me by alleging my perplexing stance to take given my eagerness. Why your insults don't surprise me anymore?

As much as you have a twisted sense for human values, and confuse my striving for justice with an angry vendetta of which you had accused me, you erroneously consider a constructive dialogue with your arrogant and ridiculous demand of speaking with my advisor. Since you claim that you are deeply involved in the school system, I had considered you as being well educated. But it looks that I was wrong, or you have just wasted the money for your tuition. Therefore, I need to tell you that I would not let my child to get anywhere close to you.
I could see that you really struggle with those issues, so let me explain you the role of ADVISOR, MEDIATOR and TRIAL LAWYER, and the meaning of the word DIALOGUE. An "ADVISOR" is a noun that derived from the noun "ADVICE," that in turn derived from the verb "ADVISE." It’s difficult to say whether there was first a chicken or an egg, but it goes that the person that advises somebody is called ADVISOR, because gives or sells ADVICE or ADVICES. Please, note that "ADVICES" is a plural of "ADVICE".
Although has some other adopted meanings that don't apply in the case of an advisor and his, or her, client (advisee), the word "DIALOGUE" primarily means the exchanging of ideas between TWO parties. Therefore, an advisor is not obligated, and it would be unethical for him, or her, to be influenced by the party adverse to his, or her, client (advisee). And this is exactly the case between my advisor and me.
A MEDIATOR, on the other site is a third party that MEDIATES (help settle a dispute) between two or more other parties, and, usually separately, engages in the dialogue with all of them. When this kind of mediation fails, the final instance where the civilized society settles disputes is the court of law where all parties come together to face the judge. This is called TRIAL.
Since the things usually get complicated, and not everybody is as intelligent and eloquent as you are, the adverse parties could hire a TRIAL LAWYER. Please note, and this is important, that the TRIAL LAWYER could be, but doesn’t necessarily need to be the same person as the legal ADVISOR. But when it is, then the legal ADVISOR becomes the TRIAL LAWYER, and there are two different categories of a fees that he, or she, charges for those two different services. So, please read the above carefully, forgive me for my less than perfect English, and try to understand the differences.

I don't want to hurt your giant ego, but since you didn't hire my advisor to advise you, my advisor has no intention to speak with you, regardless of how self-important you may feel or how well-spoken you are. You simply are not a viable partner, or a party, to speak to. And, believe it or not, for the same reasons my advisor wouldn’t even speak with your advisor, if you would have any. He also couldn't let you to hire him, because he is an ADVISOR and not a MEDIATOR, and it would be unethical for him to be hired by two adverse parties. When my ADVISOR would become my TRIAL LAWYER, or I would hire a TRIAL LAWYER different of my ADVISOR, then my TRIAL LAWYER would definitely speak with you, or with your TRIAL LAWYER in the court of law. It sometimes happens that the TRIAL LAWYERS representing the adverse parties reach a settlement during the court proceeding and the case is dismissed. This is called “out of court settlement,” Please, make a note of it.

I hope that my explanation of those basic elements would help you to understand how it works. And same as you, I’m looking forward to settle the dispute with you over your landlord duties that you neglect, and over your constant harassment. Both already inflicted too much of serious damages on me and must be stopped.

Oli P. Glenn
From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 21, 2008 8:36 AM
To:  Oddbuster
Cc:  Beruska75

Hopefully the following clarifies my expectations with regard to interactions with third parties.

1. I expect to use a "mediator" as it relates to the landlord - tenant matters which you raised via the complaint you filed against me.

2. With respect to the issues you have with Mr. Dulis and Mr. Mason I cannot, as your landlord, simply take what you have given me and do anything with it absent a dialogue with your "legal advisor"/"trial lawyer". I am not a party to those complaints so there is not a legal conflict of interest which would preclude this conversation.

Chris

OPPFELT'S MOCKERY AND INCITING OF MY WIFE AGAINST ME CONTINUE

OPPFELT MOCKS ME AND INCITES MY WIFE AGAINST ME - INITIAL INFORMATION - COMING SOON

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 21, 2008 8:50 AM
To:  Beruska75
Cc:  Oddbuster

Wendy:

Please note throughout many of Oli's emails, including this last one, I am routinely accused of saying, doing and/or thinking things that are simply not true. There is no need for me to dispute these misstatements. It is important, however, that you don't misconstrue my silence as "acceptance" of his portrayal of the situation.

Happy Holidays,

Chris

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  December 21, 2008 10:58 AM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

YOU ARE A DARNED, FREAKED, SLEEK LIAR, Mr. Oppfelt!!!
My wife knows me, and she knows that I don't lie.

 

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 21, 2008 12:59 PM
To:  Oddbuster
Cc:  Beruska75

Hopefully the following clarifies my expectations with regard to interactions with third parties.

1. I expect to use a "mediator" as it relates to the landlord - tenant matters which you raised via the complaint you filed against me.

2. With respect to the issues you have with Mr. Dulis and Mr. Mason I cannot, as your landlord, simply take what you have given me and do anything with it absent a dialogue with your "legal advisor"/"trial lawyer". I am not a party to those complaints so there is not a legal conflict of interest which would preclude this conversation.

Chris

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  December 21, 2008 2:13 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Kirkland, December 21, 2008

Whatever you say, and whatever you wish, Mr. Oppfelt. I spent enormous amount of time on explaining you my position, and your landlord duties steaming from the local, state and federal laws. To conclude this fruitless and upsetting conversation that just impedes my frugal health, I need to repeat that it is completely up to you what you would do with my multiple maintenance requests and with my complaint on Mr. Dulis and Mr. Mason.
The maintenance requests apply directly to your unit, and the other regrettable and completely unacceptable events took place on the property that you share with the other Salish Village homeowners. Mr. McCue, and you, maintain that, as a tenant, I don't have any right to address to the Salish Village Condominium Association, and all my concerns and deplorable problems that I have encountered in the Salish Village must go thought you. Therefore, you are my only channel to the Association, which is the only legal body that could resolve the problem without involving of the outside entities.
I couldn't tell you, or to order you what you should do, and my only option is to use the available legal intermediaries and public media. Eventually, in both points, you would be judged by the authorities not based on what you said, but what you have done, should do, or shouldn't do. At the same time, you would be ordered what you have to do. The same applies to me, of course.

This is my last attempt to explain you my position. In order to end this fruitless, endless, and my health damaging correspondence, I wouldn't respond to any of your future letters lacking a substance. However, please, feel free to contact me in the case if you would chance your position, and would be willing to do the requested maintenance and pursue with my complaint on President Dulis and Manager Mason as you should do so based on the applicable law.

Oli P. Glenn

OPPFELT MOCKS ME AND REFUSES TO ACT ON MY COMPLAINT

OPPFELT MOCKS ME AND REFUSES TO ACT ON MY COMPLAINT INITIAL INFORMATION - COMING SOON

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 21, 2008 3:39 PM
To:  Oddbuster
Cc:  Beruska75

I stand by everything I have previously communicated to you on these two matters. The only time that you seem to have finally understood exactly what I told you with respect to our lease was after you had some form of legal review done. I fully expect a similar outcome when other intermediaries/advisors are brought in to set matters straight.

As to the maintenance issues, I think we have agreed to work through the Office of Fair Housing to get this resolved.

As to your "formal complaint", you can expect no further action/response on my part unless I can have a conversation with your legal advisor.

Chris

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  December 21, 2008 4:17 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Hereby acknowledged.

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  December 23, 2008 3:36 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Kirkland December 23, 2008

Mr. Oppfelt!

Here is what I've found. My legal advisor won’t talk to you, a) because of the client attorney privilege and confidentiality issue; b) because he works for me on hourly basses and you didn’t hire him.
However:

  • You are my landlord, and the homeowner, and the member of Salish Village Condominium Association.
  • You are my only legal and official channel through which I could pass my issues and concerns onto the Association.
  • From at least November 26, 2008, you are aware of President Dulis’ and manager Mason’s violations and block my effort to get justice.
  • From December 19, of 2008 you have my formal complaint on hand and refuse to act.
  • On December 20, 2008, you wrote me that you would not take any action in this matter.
  • In your e-messages from December 21 of 2008, you had confirmed your position that you wouldn’t act on my complaint.

Instead of passing my complaint on the Salish Village Condominium Association, and demand investigation, eventual correction of the problem and a proper remedy, you became maliciously harassing me and have destroyed the previously good tenant - landlord relationship.
Your adverse and truly malicious reaction on my strive for justice, and on my formal complaint, ranges from negligence and obstruction of justice, to cover-up of the unlawful activities and possible crime committed by President of Salish Village Condominium Association Craig Dulis and by maintenance manager Carl Mason.

If you need to speak with a legal advisor, then you have to hire your own.

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 24, 2008 10:36 AM
To:  Oddbuster
Cc:  Beruska75

Assuming that your legal advisor has full knowledge of: your formal complaint; your assorted websites; the evidence supporting your claims; and your plan for achieving "justice", I am certain that they will welcome a conversation with me. My conversation will in no way undermine your privileged communication. And, as I told you before, there is no conflict of interest since I am not a counterparty/adversary to these claims. Rather, I am a conduit through which your claims may (or may not) proceed vis-a-vis the HOA.

Again, your resistance is perplexing.

Chris

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  December 24, 2008 1:23 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Kirkland, December 24, 2008

WHO THE HELL YOU THINK YOU ARE, MR. OPPFELT? DO YOU UNDERSTAND ENGLISH?
IN CONTRARY TO YOUR PUFFY ASSUMPTION, MY ADVISOR WILL NOT WELCOME A CONVERSATION WITH YOU AND YOU DON’T HAVE LEGAL BASES FOR YOUR PERSISTENT DEMAND!!!

If, as you say, your conversation with my legal advisor will in no way undermine my privileged communication with him, then I want to know WHAT IS THE PURPOSE AND THE NATURE OF THE CONVERSATION THAT YOU DEMAND. Do you want to tell him that you are Mr. Oppfelt - the high-and-mighty landlord and that you know better?

YOU ARE MY ADVERSARY, MY SPITEFUL AND PUFFY ADVERSARY, so don't shamelessly lie straight to my face that you are not!!!
YOU ARE MY ADVERSE LANDLORD that in retaliation for my striving for justice threatens me, harasses me, and even refuses to do the basic maintenance that is required to do by law.
YOU DON'T HAVE A LEGAL RIGHT to your persistent demand to speak with my legal advisor for whose services you didn't pay for, but YOU ARE CATTILY USING YOUR SHAMELESS DEMAND AS THE ARTIFICIAL OBSTACLE TO TREAT MY COMPLAINT PROPERLY, and thus allow its investigation and punishment of the perpetrators with which you are siding.

Under these circumstances, my advisor is not interested to waste the time with you on listening of your faulty but endless arguments, and I'll also not agree on his conversation with you about my case against you. As I told you before, if you need a legal advice hire your own advisor.
I heard and don’t agree with your unlawful arguments, and there would be no more fruitless conversation so typical to you. If you would need more information, please check for updates periodically posted at http://salishvillage.com.

THIS IS MY LAST ATTEMPT TO SETTLE THE MATTER OF YOUR MALICIOUS MISTREATMENT OF ME, BEFORE I’LL FILE THE LAWSUIT AGAINST YOU.

Oli P. Glenn
From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  December 24, 2008 2:27 PM
To:  Oddbuster
Cc:  Beruska75

So, if I understand you correctly, you are going to file a lawsuit against me because I am not able to do anything with your "formal complaint" absent a 10 minute conversation with your legal advisor? You can't be serious.
From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  December 24, 2008 4:17 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

I said everything I needed to say, and I'll neither repeat myself, nor I'll continue in responding to your impertinent communication.

Oli P. Glenn

OPPFELT CONTINUES IN MOCKING ME AND PROVOKING ME

SHYSTER-LANDLORD OPPFELT MOCKS ME AND PROVOKES ME - INITIAL INFORMATION - COMING SOON

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Wednesday, December 24, 2008 4:31 PM
To:  'Oddbuster'
Cc:  '  Beruska75'

Thank you & have a Merry Christmas!

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  Wednesday, December 24, 2008 5:09 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Kirkland December 24, 2008

Mr. Oppfelt!

Christmas is the Christian Holiday marked by good will and peace! Since you are not a Christian, and you told me that you don't believe in God, and together with the common crooks make my Christmas and my life miserable, I consider your Christmas greeting as nothing but another impertinence of yours!!! Instead of greeting you back, I just have to tell you that your should be ashamed of yourself.

Oli P. Glenn

SECOND COMPLAINT ON DULIS AND MASON - OPPFELT'S MOCKERY

I WASN'T SO NAIVE TO BELIEVE THAT THIS BLOODY CREEP WOULD DO ANYTHING WITH MY COMPLAINT.  BUT I HAVE FILED IT WITH HIM IN ORDER TO PREVENT HIM TO PLAY STUPID AND TO LIE THAT HE WASN'T AWARE OF THEIR CONTINUING HARASSMENT, AND ALSO TO SATISFY FORMAL REQUIREMENTS AND TO HAVE EVERYTHING DOCUMENTED. 

SECOND FORMAL COMPLAINT ON PREDATORY DULIS AND MASON - INITIAL INFORMATION - COMING SOON

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  Saturday, December 27, 2008 3:16 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Kirkland December 27, 2008

To:  Chris Oppfelt, landlord
13023 NE 32nd Pl, Bellevue, WA 98005

From:  Oli P. Glenn
12406 NE 130th Ct, Unit J206, Kirkland, WA 98034

RE: Formal Complaint - Harassment

On December 26, 2008, when I was coming home from mailboxes, and due to the walkways covered by heavy snow had no possibility to avoid him, the President for Salish Village Condominium Association Craig Dulis harassed me by his impertinent and mocking greeting, “Marry Christmas, Oli”! Although the weather was miserable, he cheered “nice day! Isn’t it?”
He has his creepy reason for cheering and just couldn’t control his desire to offend me. Just a day before his buddy manager Mason had returned from Honduras, where he traveled from the United States just to resume his screwing of my wife in order to prevent her to file the lawsuit against his buddy, and to testify in the lawsuit that I’m preparing against him as well. Under these circumstances, and after all what he has done to my wife, and to me, his mocking greeting is nothing but the snide and malicious harassment of me. The tone of his voice, and by his facial expression didn’t leave any doubt about the spiteful reason for his greeting.

An hour later, when I was leaving Salish Village and had no possibility to avoid him, the maintenance manager Carl Mason harassed me in the similar way, by his impertinent and mocking greeting, “Marry Christmas, Oli! How was your Christmas?”
After all what he has done to me, and because he was greeting me just a day after he returned from Honduras where he traveled from the United States just to resume his screwing of my wife, and his messing with her on behalf of his perverted buddy President Dulis, and to satisfy his salacious desires of course, his mocking greeting is nothing but the snide and malicious harassment of me as well. The tone of his voice, and his facial expression couldn’t leave any doubt about it as well.

You should know that all what the manager Mason has done, and continue doing to my wife on behalf of his perverted buddy President Dulis, is tempering with the witness and the predatory coercion by seduction. Under current circumstances, this is a criminal offense. Manager Mason’s behavior matches with his criminal background and should not be tolerated in Salish Village and anywhere else.

As I wrote in my previous complaint form December 19, 2008, now it is clear that if those two profoundly crooked individuals acting like common thieves and sexual maniacs would be left unchecked, then no other women, and no other marriage or relationship in the Salish Village would be safe. So would not be I.

Therefore, I expect nothing les from you but your prompt and decisive action leading to the containing and proper punishment of those two individuals.
Please, let me know if you would need some additional information.

Sincerely,
Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Saturday, December 27, 2008 4:57 PM
To:  'Oddbuster'
Cc:  '  Beruska75'

Oli:

I don't think there is anything illegal about wishing someone else a Merry Christmas, regardless of facial expression or tone of voice. Is there an RCW that I am unaware of?

Also, I am not sure what you expect me to do regarding your allegations of "witness tampering" and "predatory seduction". If you (and your legal advisor) think these are criminal offenses, you should be contacting law enforcement resources rather than me.

Chris

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  Saturday, December 27, 2008 6:05 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc: 
Beruska75

Mr. Oppfelt!

You continue in addressing me by my first name despite of that I have asked you to not do so, and have cautioned you that I consider it a harassment. And this is what it is! You started harassing me by alleged invalidity of the lease, you are harassing me by the constructive eviction, and on top of all you are harassing me and degrading me by willful addressing me by my first name!!!

As to my complaint, I have not asked you for your opinion. You are my landlord, and I have filed the harassment complaint with you in order to follow the procedure to which I have been commanded by Mr. McCue and by you. It is too bad that you don't know what to do with my complaint, and it is even worse that after I have decided to not standby to the assault by President for Salish Village Condominium Association Craig Dulis, and by the maintenance manager Car Masson, I always encounter just your arrogant and negative attitude. Since you block my every effort to resolve the regrettable problem with them in the way to which McCue Inc. and you are pushing me, I am not surprised that they become mocking The situation is unsustainable, but is up to you what you would do with my complaint because you are the one who would be liable after all.

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Saturday, December 27, 2008 6:23 PM
To:  Oddbuster'
Cc:  'Beruska75'

I have provided you the most simple instruction as to what needs to happen for me to possibly be in position to move forward on your formal complaint (remember my request for a conversation with your "legal advisor"?). What is the hold up? Do you really want some action to be taken? Your resistance would make me believe that you have little or no interest in actually getting anything accomplished.

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  Saturday, December 27, 2008 7:03 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Mr. Oppfelt!

You never responded to my question why you need to speak with my legal advisor, and what would be the nature of your conversation. Until then, your request is just baseless.

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Saturday, December 27, 2008 7:32 PM
To:  'Oddbuster'
Cc:  'Beruska75'

You are welcome to be in attendance at the meeting or listening in, in the case of a conference call.

From:   Oddbuster
Sent:  Sunday, December 28, 2008 2:30 AM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:   Beruska75

WOW!

I feel truly flattered by your magnanimity, my majesty. However, until you will reveal the subject and the nature of your so shamelessly demanded conversation with my advisor, there wouldn't be any, my lord. By the way, my advisor charges $175 per hour. Are you willing to pay for it?
Please, let me know.

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Sunday, December 28, 2008 8:26 AM
To:  'Oddbuster'
Cc:  'Beruska75'

Happy to pay for it. Should only take 10 minutes. Let me know when a meeting can be arranged.

Thanks!

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  Sunday, December 28, 2008 1:09 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Mr. Oppfelt:

Read my message from Sunday, December 28, 2008 2:31 AM carefully. It says, “...until you will reveal the subject and the nature of your so shamelessly demanded conversation with my advisor, there wouldn't be any.” Even then, I have no reason to let you to temper with my advisor, or to consult your issues with him.

However, if you will not resume fulfilling of your landlord duties immediately, and will not do the repairs listed in my e-message from December 08, 2008 9:48 PM and December 10, 2008 9:28 PM as you have promised to do them before, and will not properly act on my formal complaints, then I promise you that you will be speaking with my trial lawyer before long.

Instead of fulfilling of your landlord’s duties, you are mocking me, and just try to divert the focus from the practical issues to the struggles over the unrelated matter. For instance, in addition to the other, you have never responded to my request of your written confirmation of your previous verbal permission to have a small pet in your unit, as I have asked you in my message from December 12, 2008 11:23 PM.

However, you clearly refuse to do the necessary maintenance; you clearly refuse to fix the smoke problem, and clearly refuse to act on my formal complaints.

Under these circumstances, your baseless demands of your conversation with my advisor, as the condition for doing of the previously mentioned, are just a harassment and mockery. Therefore, I will not communicate with you on this issue anymore and will react on your obvious constructive eviction as it is proper.

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Sunday, December 28, 2008 2:04 PM
To:  'Oddbuster'
Cc:  'Beruska75'

Evidently you have decided not to further pursue your formal complaint through me. That is your choice and that is totally fine with me. Going forward, do not request further consideration of this complaint until such time are you are willing to comply with my one condition.

Please recall that we have agreed to resolve our landlord-tenant matters via your chosen mediator - the Office of Fair Housing. I am still awaiting contact from them.

Chris

P.S. As you noted in reviewing our lease agreement, there is no pet addendum and therefore no pets are allowed.

OPPFELT MALICIOUSLY ABUSES THE CONTACT INFO ON MY WIFE

OPPFELT MALICIOUSLY ABUSES THE CONTACT INFO ON MY WIFE

THE  INITIAL INFORMATION ABOUT OPPFELT's  MOCKERY - COMING SOON

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  Monday, December 29, 2008 3:46 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Kirkland, December 29, 2008

Mr. Oppfelt:

To correct your idiosyncratic perception about my formal complaints that I have filed with you, I need to assure you that I insist that you should pursue both of them, as you required to do so as a my landlord and a U.S. citizen. Your demand to temper with my legal advisor, which you have invented as your condition to do so, is extortion and blackmailing!

Your written ban on the small pets in your unit contradicts your verbal approval that you gave to my wife, and to me, at the time of signing the lease. However, nothing surprises me from you anymore! You have just, once again, proved to both of us that you are a wicked and not at all trustworthy individual. Moreover, your written ban that contradicts you previous verbal approval is just a one more item to the constructive eviction by which you hamper me.

Oli P. Glenn

P.S.

I have compelling information that you are maliciously abusing the contact e-address on my wife, which you have requested allegedly for the three-polar conversation. I gave it to you, but with the condition that every piece of information would be dispersed to all three parties and you agreed with it.

During Mr. Mason's stay in Honduras, where he traveled before Christmas in order to continue in tempering with my wife, and to eliminate her as a possible plaintiff and witness, you have corresponded with him, and with my wife, about our issues. At least in one occasion, you did the same with my wife even before he came there.

Since neither of you ever sent me a copy of these conversations, you are secretly plotting behind my back. This goes to your character, and it would be considered in the future proceeding.

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Monday, December 29, 2008 5:44 PM
To:  'Oddbuster'
Cc:  'Beruska75'

Please explain how, because I am a US citizen, I am required to do something with your formal complaint? Also, how is a request to have a conversation with your legal advisor "extortion and blackmailing"? I have no idea where you are coming up with these.

I am not interested in adding a pet agreement at this time. While there was a conversation about this around the inception of the lease, conditions have changed and I don't think it is in your, or my, best interest to add a pet to the mix.

There have been a few email exchanges between Wendy and me that you were not cc'd on. Our agreement is that all discussions relating to landlord - tenant matters and our lease should be shared between the parties. To the extent that the discussion topic is unrelated to these, there is no need to cc: you on such emails. Likewise, I would not expect you to cc: me on unrelated communications that you have with Wendy. There is no "secret plotting" behind your back nor "malicious abuse". If/when there is ever an appropriate need to share these email exchanges I'll have no problem doing so.

Chris

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  Wednesday, December 31, 2008 8:56 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Mr. Oppfelt,

You are in violation of our agreement, it doesn't matter how you'll twist it, and I am requesting copies of all messages that you and my wife have exchanged and didn't send me a cc. I also request all messages that you have exchanged with manager Mason using the e-address beruska75@hotmail.com during his stay in Honduras.

I need to remind you that Wendy is my wife, and I can communicate with her on any matter without sending you a cc. In contrary, you are her and my landlord and everything you communicate with her is a landlord - tenant matter.

You would learn how things are related to extortion ,blackmailing, conspiracy and coercion from my trial lawyer.

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Wednesday, December 31, 2008 9:29 PM
To:  'Oddbuster'
Cc:  'Beruska75'

Oli:

Happy New Year!!!!

I am under no obligation to share with you conversations or emails that are unrelated to our lease agreement and/or our landlord-tenant relationship. Sorry that you are not able to understand this.

I look forward to understanding your interpretation of "extortion, blackmailing, conspiracy and coercion" via your trial lawyer. Will your trial lawyer also be in position to explain to me why I have a duty to do something with your formal complaint because I am a "U.S. citizen"? This is a legal interpretation that I am not familiar with vis-a-vis landlord-tenant law.

Chris

P.S. Hope you too realize and can accept that adding a pet to the mix is not in your, or my, best interest at this time.

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  Wednesday, December 31, 2008 10:56 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Mr. Oppfelt!

I consider your wishing me "Happy New Year" as just another instance of your sneer, and the rest of your message as the insult and harassment. Don’t delete those messages, because they would be subpoenaed by the court. If you would do so, then you will deliberately destroy the evidence. If it would be necessary, they would be, at your expense, recovered from the other source.

Since you are well aware about my life threatening heart condition, as well as about the fact that smoke and/or stress could easily kill me, I am also accusing you of conspiracy and attempt to commit a murder.

Oli P. Glenn

BLOODY SHYSTER-LANDLORD OPPFELT ALMOST KILLED ME

On December 31, 2008, sometime before 10:00 PM, this SOB landlord OPPFELT drove me to the situation when I have suffered by stroke, or by seizure.  I have passed out for some time, and it came so suddenly that I wasn't even able to pickup the phone and call 911.  I am not sure for how long I had been out, but I know that it was well before 10:00 PM when I had passed out, and that was 10:07 PM when I came back and was able to take a look on the clock. 
I felt so exhausted and miserable that I didn't even care whether I would live or die.  When I was able to start thinking again, I had had vividly in my mind that it was the creepy OPPFELT who brought me into this medical trauma.  Also, that it is he who is primarily responsible for my pain and suffering during the past months. 
While I was further recovering, I felt the urgent need to do something.  So, I sent this creep the message informing him that I am holding him responsible for my trauma and for my pain and suffering. 
He apparently had a good time while he was harassing me on the New Year Eve, so he sent me his response right away.  However, I didn't open his message, because I was positive that there would be just another insult, or something creepy as usual, and I didn't want to let him to upset me, again. 

Eventually, I have opened his pending message on January 7, 2008, in correlation with his later message in which he continues to deny me the right to have in my large 1br unit a live-in caretaker that would act for me in the case of emergency as my doctor recommended. 
As I have expected, it was a vise decision to not open his message, showed below, sooner.  He gives me there his impertinent and patronizing advice to share this website, and our email exchanges, with my physician.  His message is cynically insulting, and demonstrates his arrogant insensitivity and his profoundly creepy character.

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Thursday, January 01, 2009 11:11 AM
To:  Oddbuster'
Cc:  'Beruska75'

Oli:

Please make an appointment to see your personal physician as soon as you can. Share your websites and our email exchanges. You will benefit greatly from his/her professional advice and help.

Chris

OPPFELT DENIES ME THE RIGHT TO HAVE A LIVE-IN CARE-TAKER

OPPFELT DENIES ME THE RIGHT TO HAVE A LIVE-IN CARE-TAKER - Wednesday, January 07, 2009 8:09 AM -

CONSTRUCTIVE EVICTION INITIAL INFORMATION - COMING SOON

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  Monday, January 05, 2009 5:42 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Mr. Oppfelt:

On December 31, just a couple hours before New Year, your malicious harassment and mockery, combined with my fragile health nearly killed me. For sake of my health, I didn’t even open your message from January 1, 2009, 11:11 AM, yet, and do not intend to do so in the near future.

For same reason, I wanted to cease the communication with you altogether, and resolve the pending issues through the HUD or through my trial lawyer. However, today I need to make exception and resolve with you the one urgent issue.

The par. 6, of our lease agreement says: “Tenant shall not assign this Agreement, sublet all or any portion of the Property, nor give accommodation to any roomers or lodgers, without the prior written consent of Lessor or Lessor’s Broker.”

This condition deviates from the Washington State housing laws, is degrading, and I should never agree with it. However, since I have blindly signed it, I’m obligated to honor it.

On November 26, 2008, during your evening visitation in my home, (I was still unaware about the full version of the paragraph 6), we were speaking about the possibility of my future roommate, and you gave me your verbal permission to have one, provided that would comply with the Salish Village requirements.

Today, based on the paragraph 6 of our agreement, I’m asking you to gave me you written permission to have in my home a live-in companion - caretaker, provided that would satisfy the Salish Village standard requirements.

Thank you in advance,

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Tuesday, January 06, 2009 6:04 AM
To:  Oddbuster
Cc:  Beruska75

It does not make any sense to add an additional tenant to the mix at this time. Therefore, I will not grant you permission to do so.

Restricting the ability to assign the agreement and/or subletting is very standard lease language. I think you’d have a hard time finding a landlord that wouldn’t have such a clause in their lease.

Just to clarify... While there was what I would call an “exploratory discussion” about the possibility of you finding a roommate, I never gave you verbal permission that you could add one. Rather, I mentioned to you then that there was lease language regarding this and that I would have the right as the landlord to approve or disapprove any changes. I also mentioned to you that “if” I were to agree to any changes we’d also have to fully comply with the condo association’s rules regarding tenancy changes.

Lastly, I am going to be migrating away from Comcast. Going forward please email me at chris.oppfelt@gmail.com.

Chris

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:59 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt ; Chris Oppfelt
Cc:  Beruska75

Mr. Oppfelt!

This message is to ask you to seriously reconsider your decision to deny me the right to have a live-in companion - caretaker that would satisfy the Salish Village standard requirements. Also, I want you to specify what you mean by the "the mix," that you cite as the reason for your decision.

1. During my 30 years in the United States I have rented, or leased, several different apartments and condominiums. None of them, however, had such a restriction as you have. For instance, I have on hand the rental agreement from my last place, and I can prove it that there is not such a restriction.

2. Some landlords might have such a restriction, but if they are not creepy they would not abuse it for baseless restricting of their tenants and for senseless denying them the right to have somebody living with them.

3. We have signed the lease with you for TWO occupants, my wife and me. Due to the DULIS - MASON plot, and MASON's predatory coercion by seduction, my wife left the premises and explicitly expressed her intend to never come back.

4. Currently, I am now only ONE occupant remaining on the premises. That means that it is not about adding another physical tenant that would cause additional wear and tear, and it is not even about adding another person to the lease.

5. My wife, however, has the right to occupancy, and if she would ever change her decision would want to come back, then the situation would be resolved accordingly and based on the applicable laws and rules.

6. It is not about adding the additional tenant, but a live-in caretaker - companion (that would have rights pertained to a roommate only) and would act in the case of my recurring medical emergency.

7. Your stated reasoning for denying me the right to have somebody living with me because "It does not make any sense to add an additional tenant to the mix at this time" is unjustified and therefore abusive.

You are well aware about my critical medical condition, aggravated by your regrettable malicious actions, and I am positive that you know that in my medical condition just a few minutes plays the crucial role between life and death.

For all above reasons, and for all other reasons that steams from your malicious harassment and extortion because of my strive to bring the President for HOA CRAIG DULIS and the maintenance manager CARL MASON to justice, your further baseless denying me the right to have somebody living with me for the case of emergency, is equal to the malicious intend to harm another person and possibly cause death.

Therefore, I urge you to reconsider your decision with no delay!!! If this shouldn't be a case, then I would be forced to take immediate action against you in order to protect my health as well as my life.

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Wednesday, January 07, 2009 8:09 AM
To:  Oddbuster
Cc:  Beruska75

I am sensitive to your situation but my one bedroom/ one bathroom condo unit is not well suited for unrelated occupants and I have no interest in allowing such a living arrangement. Regardless of our lease agreement, I have offered you an early exit to enable you to pursue finding a housing arrangement that better suits your current situation and health condition. This is the only option that will ensure you attain the smoke/odor-free environment you seek. And, given your most recent housing needs/desires (live-in caretaker, pet) I would assume it is a no-brainer for you to look for a new housing option that meets all your current needs.

While I'd want to minimize any vacancy in my condo unit, I will be flexible and fair as to the notice requirements contained in the lease. The more advance notice you can give me with regard to move out timing would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,

Chris

OPPFELT REFUSES TO DO MAINTENANCE AND HIRE A MANAGING CO.

OPPFELT REFUSES TO DO MAINTENANCE AND HIRE A MANAGING CO.

- INITIAL INFORMATION - COMING SOON

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:Friday, January 09, 2009 9:12 AM
To:Oddbuster
Cc:Beruska75

Oli:

It has been about 30 days since you said you filed your complaint against me with the Department of Housing.  Did they share with you  some idea of when they would be able to process your complaint?  It seems odd that it is taking this long.  Can you check in with them to see what sort of timetable we can expect?  I have been holding off on replacing the garbage disposal under the presumption that they would have inserted themselves into the situation sooner and that we'd be moving toward implementing a fail-proof solution/ plan by now. 

Let me know what you can find out.
 
Chris

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Friday, January 23, 2009 5:46 PM
To:  Oddbuster

  Mr. Glenn:

We have some unfinished business to resolve. From your filing associated with your requested protection order, you mentioned the complaint registered with the Office of Fair Housing but you indicated in that filing that "housing experts told me that nothing much would probably happen at all".

I don't want to leave the issue that led to this complaint filing unresolved. Is there some other trusted mediator that you would like to get involved?

I don't think it makes sense for us to attempt to resolve this dispute directly so it is imperative we find an intermediary that could help bring closure to this matter.

And, while there is one other repair issue that is outstanding (swapping out the garbage disposal), I suspect I am not welcome to come into the unit to make this repair so I don't know how to proceed.

Do you have suggestions?

Chris

From:  Oddbuster
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 8:09 PM
To: Chris Oppfelt

Mr. Oppfelt:

Thank you for asking me. I would suggest that you should hire the reputable managing company that would manage your unit for you according to the applicable laws and rules. This practice is commonly used by the property owners, and I believe that it would be the best step to the resolution of outstanding problems. Since the Office of Fair Housing really doesn't seem to be working as they promise, I am currently in the process of hiring the lawyer that will take you to the court of law.

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  Saturday, January 24, 2009 10:19 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Mr. Oppfelt:

I need to point that in the case that you decide to hire the professional managing company, this company most definitely should be McCue & Associates Inc., or any company affiliated to the company for which you work, or any other company on which you could have more influence than any other of its clients.

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  Thursday, February 05, 2009 5:25 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Mr. Oppfelt:

Twelve days passed and I did not hear from you. We still have some unfinished business to resolve, in addition to the items that you mentioned in your message from Friday, January 23, 2009. As for instance the hallway flooring replacement, incoming smoke problem, and your denying me the live-in aid and the dog that would be my service dog. Therefore, I was wondering, are you going to hire some reputable managing company that would manage your unit for you according the applicable laws and rules or not?

Please, let me know. Oli Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Thursday, February 05, 2009 6:02 PM
To:  Oddbuster

Just received email from you re: awaiting a response from me.  Did you not see/receive my email below?  Is there something about my message that is unclear?

On Jan 25, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Chris Oppfelt wrote:  

I am not a passive real estate investor and don't need a property management company to handle my affairs.  Besides, as it relates to the issue that triggered your compliant,  even if there was a property management firm involved they would turn to me to provide guidance as to what to do and how to do it.

Your hiring a lawyer to represent you in mediating resolution of your complaint is fine with me.  If there are interim solutions that we can both agree to I am open to suggestions.

OPPFELT DEFIES MY DOCTORS' RECOMMENDATION AND DENIES ME THE RIGHT TO HAVE A LIVE-IN AID

OPPFELT DEFIES MY DOCTOR RECOMMENDATION TO HAVE A LIVE-IN AID

- INITIAL INFORMATION - COMING SOON

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:37 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

No, I had not received the message below to which you are referring to

As the attachment I am sending you the note from my doctor stating that I need a live-in aid. He would be happy to write more for the court. Meantime, the legal aid told me as quoted. "He can't bark, but he can't stop you of having a live-in aid! It's illegal! Get one, and when he would start evicting you he will lose in court in the big way." This week, I am going to see my lung doctor and I will go from there. Be aware that once I'll hire the lawyer, there would not be the way back and you would be ultimately responsible for all expenses.

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:Saturday, February 07, 2009 9:05 PM
To:Kamarech

Oli:

You need to find someone who can look at your situation holistically and help you to think clearly and proceed in a manner that is truly in your best interest.  I have offered an intelligent/rational solution that would:

1.  Enable you to quickly achieve the absolute best living arrangement for your current needs (live-in caretaker/smoke odor avoidance/desire to have a pet...). 
2.  Make it easier for you to maintain compliance with the restraining order in place against you.
3.  Help you gain "separation" from those which you sought in your protection order filings.  While your requests were all promptly dismissed by the Superior Court of Washington for both lack of evidence and credibility you, nonetheless, must still desire to gain some sort of physical/mental "separation".
4.  Help you to commence with needed emotional healing.

I know you will greatly benefit by using a competent advisor, who understands your physical and emotional health needs, to represent you. 
Please find one and have them contact me so we can work together to help you attain what would truly be in

Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  Saturday, February 07, 2009 11:13 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Stop calling me by my first name!  Stop patronizing me!  I'm not a little boy, and I do not appreciate your mocking advices!   Save you mentoring for yourself or for your boys! 
You have insulted me in the court by labeling me mentally ill, and you obviously think that you would getaway with it just because the bias, and absolutely unfair judge had tolerated you this per say insult.  But you are wrong! 
 
I am not aware of that you would ever offer me any intelligent/rational solution.  Please, restrict yourself from patronizing me, and comply with the Washington State laws and with the Americans with Disabilities Act instead. 
I like it here, I have invested a lot of work in putting of your apartment in order in which should be, and I will stay here until the lease expires.  The fact that I have lost the anti-harassment cases decided by the bias judge doesn't mean that you should not comply with the applicable laws and rules related to the landlord-tenant issues.  It also doesn't mean that you can continue in mocking me and in insulting me by addressing me by my first name, despite of that I have numerous time requested you to not do that. 
 
Your next e-mail would not be answered, and would be considered as harassment, if would not deal exclusively with the landlord-tenant issues that thanks to your unwillingness to comply with the applicable laws and rules stay unresolved. 
Alternatively, if you want me out of here, then you will speak with my lawyer and he will tell you how much it would cost you to forcibly relocate me.
From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Sunday, February 08, 2009 10:28 AM
To:  Oli Glenn

Oli:

Was that a typo in your last email?  Did you really write "I like it here"?  I had to practically pick myself up off the floor after reading that one.  Has there been a sudden 180-degree change in your opinion or have you have you been lying in your communications to me and in your writings on your websites?  If you've been lying this whole time then shame on you.
 
For the record, you may not like the outcome of your attempted court action, but:

1.  You lied in your written application and accompanying sworn statement. 
2.  You lied under oath in the court room.
3.  You did not prevail because of an "absolutely unfair judge" but rather because you couldn't back up your lies with any evidence.
4.  You wasted valuable taxpayer dollars and valuable court time.
Again, shame on you.
 
Please reread my emails if you are not aware that I have offered you an intelligent/rational solution to your situation.  You have every email I have ever sent.  It's in there. 
 
Again, you will greatly benefit by using a competent advisor to represent you.  Please find one and have them contact me so we can work together to help you attain what would truly be in your best interest.  I have encouraged you to do this repeatedly now for months and I continue to be perplexed as to why you are unwilling to do what's best for you.
 
Chris
From:  Kamarech
Sent:  Monday, February 09, 2009 2:19 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

... Oppfelt!

Please revise your communication to me.  I stopped reading your message after the first line because is loaded by your well-known impertinence, and contains your feebleminded but still crooked assertions that I have specifically requested you to keep me out of, and your comments that, at least as relates to me, are simply not true. 
I am indulgent to your obvious mental deviation which apparently prevents you to quit your lying and your crooked deception that you have declared as the part of your nature, and that you had so vehemently recommended to me to adopt as the way in which I should resolve the problem created by my naïve ex-wife and those two sexual predators Dulis Masson which you have eventually fully embraced.  However, we need to resolve the practical issues related to your landlord duties and to my tenant rights, and there is no reason that you cannot extend appropriate respect to me as to the tenant that has eminent interest to maintain your property in good order. 

Please, stop and think about yourself a little, as well as what you are doing and why, and follow me in my attempt to reestablishing a healthy landlord-tenant relationship and dialogue.

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Monday, February 09, 2009 3:38 PM
To:  Kamarech

Oli:   

"Appropriate respect" has always been extended to you.  You just don't want to do what is in your own best interest.    Again:
1   Find a trusted advisor.
2.  Share your situation, your websites, our communications, your court filings and resulting outcomes...
3.  Put them in touch with me so we can help you through this.

 Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  Monday, February 09, 2009 9:29 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

... Oppfelt!
 
This is the last time I will repeat it for you. 
 
I DON’T NEED ANY OF YOUR PATRONIZING ADVICES AND ANY YOUR HELP!  THE ONLY I NEED, AND WHAT I EXPECT FROM YOU IS THAT YOU WOULD COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE LAWS AND RULES AS THEY ARE WRITTEN!  
So, why you are refusing to do so when it would cost you nothing or next to nothing, and why you hassle me out of my home instead? 
 
Oli P. Glenn

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  Friday, February 13, 2009 12:52 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Mr. Oppfelt:
 
As the attachment, I am sending you the note from my doctor stating that I need a live-in aid, and, as I said before, he would be happy to write me more for the court.  As the second attachment, I am sending you the note from my other doctor stating that the second hand smoke aggravates my asthma problems.  He would be happy to write more for the court as well. 

In addition, I want to advice you, AGAIN, that I am formally a disabled person.  Therefore, I am covered by the American Disability Act that consequently applies on you as well.  For these reasons, I am asking you, AGAIN, to comply with the Washington State Landlord-Tenant laws, with the Americans with Disabilities Act, with the Fair Housing Act and with the Washington Human Rights Act, and IMMEDIATELY fix the problems that I have numerous times asked you to fix before, and that you have initially promised to fix. 

It is evident that you intentionally create the health hazard for me in your unit on purpose of constructive eviction, and thus deliberately ruin my health Mr. Oppfelt!  
Since the two and half months of trying to have you to fix the problems brought me just a lot of hassles, and your mockery created the number of additional health problems for me, please note that this is my last attempt to resolve the problems spelled in my previous e-messages out of court. 

Oli P. Glenn

OPPFELT - McCUE - DULIS - MASON CONSPIRE AGAINST ME, AGAIN

OPPFELT - McCUE - DULIS - MASON CONSPIRE AGAINST ME - INITIAL INFORMATION - COMING SOON

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Friday, February 13, 2009 2:06 PM
To:  Oli Glenn

Oli:
 
I think it's only fair that you understand that I am getting squeezed on two ends.  Read on:
 
At the beginning of the week I was contacted by the Salish Village property management company.  I have had a couple phone conversations with them and am awaiting receipt of a letter they supposedly mailed to me yesterday.  From the brief information that has been shared thus far, evidently, your disparaging comments regarding the Salish Village community have adversely impacted one or more innocent residents -- which is what you knowingly sought to accomplish.  To quote you from your website (http://salishvillage.com):  "in addition to pursuing our cases in courts, I will also continuously publish my whole matter using all available media, and will make sure that only a complete fool would ever be willing to buy a condominium in the place headed and managed by...  Moreover the negative popularity of the Salish Village could considerably reduce the property value".

You have been aware that your writings in your websites could cause harm to innocent residents of this community and that, as a tenant, this would put you in violation of the "waste" and "nuisance" provisions of your duties as a tenant. 

I advised you in our face-to-face meeting on the evening of November 26, 2008 that, while you have rights to free speech, you also needed to be very careful and seek legal opinion before you published anything that would be deemed slanderous or defamatory or create a "nuisance".
 
According to the Landlord-Tenant Law, if a tenant causes "waste" or "nuisance" to other tenants/residents it is the landlord's responsibility -- acting out of duty to protect other tenants/residents -- that the landlord commence action that could ultimately result in eviction.

Please also be aware of Washington State Law:

 
TENANT’S RESPONSIBILITIES [RCW 59.18.130]
A tenant is required to:

• Not permit “waste” (substantial damage to the property) or “nuisance” (substantial interference with other tenant’s use of property)

State law goes on to say:

"For creating a “waste or nuisance.” If a tenant destroys the landlord’s property, uses the premises for unlawful activity including gang- or drug-related activi-ties, damages the value of the property or interferes with other tenant’s use of the property, the landlord can issue a three-day notice to move out. The tenant must move out after this kind of notice. There is no option to stay and correct the problem."

I have managed rentals for a number of years now and have never had to deal with a formal eviction.  This is new and horribly unpleasant territory for me.
 
I need to get my hands on this letter:
1.  To see exactly what it says,
2.  To make sure I fully understand the facts and evidence supporting the apparent harm,
3.  To determine if I agree with the resulting consequences to you.
I will proceed carefully but also must act in a manner which ensures that I uphold my landlord responsibilities vis-a-vis other tenants/residents.

Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  Monday, February 16, 2009 8:57 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Kirkland, February 16, 2009

And here we go again, Oppfelt!

Once again, instead of recovering from my trauma to which you have personally largely contributed, and instead of doing the other important things, I have to write you the letter to contain your attempt to hassle me out of my home. 

Your and McCUE & ASSOCIATES INC tricks and threats with the invalidity of my lease didn’t work; I didn’t give you the chance to screw me during my divorce proceeding; your hassling me and your constructive eviction also do not work well; your systematic undermining of my health is backfiring on you; and your (I mean all of you) plans to put me in jail based on my alleged violation of my ex-wife’s bogus Protective Order that she obtained just because she was coerced into it in order to allow you to use it as the excuse for evicting me also doesn’t work well; so now we are now back in the square one once again.  Only, at this time there is the interesting twist. 

You are actually telling me (threatening me) that you would be evicting me on behalf of those two villains Dulis and Mason, because of my website where I describe the truth situation in Salish Village “have adversely impacted one or more innocent residents.”  Coincidently, I have no doubt who this “one or more innocent” residents is, or are. 
Your sentence, “your disparaging comments regarding the Salish Village community have adversely impacted one or more innocent residents -- which is what you knowingly sought to accomplish” is really interesting.  So, let me tell you straight.  The time of the big lies, deception, and painful emotions is over, the things eventually bubbled up, and now it is the time to pursue in my case based just on the amassed irrefutable facts. 

The key fact is, that nobody who supports, or anyhow collaborates with somebody who hurts the other people, or couples with the proven crook(s) is innocent, and it is only fair if there is the price to be paid.  Next to you, and to my ex-wife, those two villains that represent the Salish Village HOA are responsible for whole current misery, and for my pain and suffering.  There is 168 units in Salish Village, and we are yet to see what those other about 160 homeowners (excluding those who definitely side with those two villains) would say.  When you are so sure that they would turn on me, then why you and McCUE & ASSOCIATES try to prevent me to submit them my case?  And why they use the preposterous claims that “one or more innocent residents” are allegedly adversely impacted by my website? 

Your whining that you are getting squeezed on two ends is really Pharisee!  The question is, who is squeezing you and why?  From the very beginning, I am telling you that I want nothing but justice, and that, in the one way or the other, I will get it and have tried to keep you out of it. 
My position is very simple, those crooks have no business to hold the two top positions in Salish Village and to act there as they are the whole HOA.  As the mater of fact, I believe that they are dangerous villainous sexual predators, and should be kept from any public positions where they would be able to interfere with the private life of the other people. 

I also told you that the whole issue would be over in the moment when those two villains would be forced (for ever) out of their top positions in Salish Village HOA that they defrauded! 

However, the only who could discharge them are the Salish Village homeowners, and you should realize that I have nothing more to lose and that I will eventually contact then, like it or not.  We both know, however, that I’m running the real risk hat they could really turn on me, and I would have to leave the Salish Village after all.  Therefore, if you would hassle me out of my home you would gain absolutely nothing.  In contrary, you have lost your good face and your leverage, and forced me to include you in the rank of my enemies. 

Do you remember that while I was trying to keep you out of this issue, you were the one who enthusiastically inserted yourself into it and had taken the wrong side?  You were double-faced, and kept telling me that we both are satisfied with the lease, and therefore there is no reason for its termination.  However, at same time you were paving the road for evicting me, if I wouldn’t comply with the McCue and Associates and your wishes.  You had insisted, that I am just the old and ill man, and that I should just forget the whole thing and should get over the despicable crime perpetrated by Dulis and Mason on my ex-wife and on me. 

Since you have nothing on hand, yet, and the reasoning that you have expressed in your e-mail wouldn’t hold in courts, it rises the question why you are hassling me, again?  Why you bother me with your adverse thoughts while you don’t have anything on hand yet, and why you don’t wait until the McCUE & ASSOCIATES INC that from very beginning provide the cover for those two villains will actually produce something?  Then, why you don’t pursue with the eviction if you would have the valid reason for it? 
Are you being suddenly so nice, and want to give me the advantage of knowing the things in advance?  I don’t think so!  I think that we are back in the old issue of your open threats by my eviction, again. 

I have not started promoting of my website, I didn't send the letter to the Salish Village homeowners, I didn't contact the mass media, and I didn't even upload the metafiles that would guarantee the larger publicity on the Internet.  This all I didn't do, yet.  The delay happened just because you have picked up the fight for those two crooks, deprived me of a lot of time, and caused me a lot of troubles and the consequent medical problems with which I am currently dealing. 

But can I guarantee, that in the one way or the other, as long as those “innocent” Salish Village homeowners would tolerate the fact that the Salish Village is managed by two villainous sexual predators that abused their official authority and destroyed my marriage, and thus ruined my life, my website would be up and running and I will start its promotion.
If instead of kicking of their arse, those “innocent” homeowners would side with them, and would turn on me as you did, then they would not be “innocent” at all.  Then, with their blessing, the Salish Village would continue to be the place where those creepiest things happen without repercussion, and the place that any decent human being should avoid.  Therefore, regardless of where I would be living, I will not stop telling the truth about the Salish Village, and thus do a good service for those who would be thinking about buying of the property there. 

And of course, everything translates to money, so the byproduct of my quest for justice, and of my good service for public, would be the possible decrease of the property value there.  This, however, could be easily avoided if those two villains would be discharged from their positions in Salish Village, which is just a fraction of what they really deserve for their abuses of their positions, as well as for their despicable behavior and their malicious actions. 
If, however, you and they, thing that you would find same bias judge, as that who made his ill decision in the cases of the antiharassment orders, and that the judge would evict me and/or would deprive me of my constitutional rights, then you, and they, should think again.  If this should be the case, then with the lot of publicity we would eventually end in the highest court if it would be necessary.  
Moreover, be aware that you didn't answer my question whether or not you will do the necessary repairs, and that you are browsing in the territory of not just constructive eviction, but also in territory of the retaliatory eviction! 

If you really feel being squeezed, then you should realize that it is the time for you to take (not just pretend but really take) the right side.  I am fighting for justice, have nothing more to lose, and whatever you/they would do against me, it would always backfire and it would make the whole thing for them, and for you, even worse.

Oli P. Glenn

From: Chris Oppfelt
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 12:09 PM
To: Oli Glenn

Oli: 
As you are aware, you are responsible for the consequences of your actions/behavior in or around the Salish Village property that causes a nuisance or damages the community.
According to the Condominium Declarations any costs that are incurred by the Association that were caused by and directly relate to a particular unit are to be billed back to that unit.  These types of charges flow to the unit owner first and then, if caused by a tenant are appropriately the responsibility of that tenant.
 
Attached is an invoice for charges that are your responsibility.  Please remit reimbursement directly to me.

Fortunately this first bill is pretty small.  It is my understanding that further charges are forthcoming.  I am not privy to all actions by the Association but I suspect that there are efforts underway to charge you with libel in relation to "malicious, false, and defamatory" written words per your websites.
 
I respect that you have rights to free speech but I would caution you that your sites appear to have not been subject to any sort of legal review and contain many statements which easily pass the test for constituting libel.

Chris 

Below is the invoice copy -

From: Illtreated
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 10:24 PM
To: Chris Oppfelt

Dear lord Oppfelt,

Was that a typo in your last email?  Did you really write, "Attached is an invoice for charges that are your responsibility.  Please remit reimbursement directly to me"?  I had to practically pick myself up off the floor after reading that one.  Has there been a sudden change in your strategy, or have you been lying in your communications to me when you have advised me to share my websites?  If you've been lying this whole time then shame on you! 
It is not a coincidence if some of the above sounds familiar to you!  You wrote me the similar insults when, despite of all your harassment and torturing me, I told you that I like to live here in Salish Village.  Do you remember that, lord Oppfelt???  Shame on you, again!!! 

As you know, or should know, the McCue & Associates have every right to evaluate (on their expense) any website they choose.  They have this right even though if they are doing so due to their gross mismanagement of Salish Village property, and with the malicious intend to protect those two villainous sexual predators Dulis and Mason that ram unchecked throughout the Salish Village and are proven to be detrimental threat to its residents.  That's their decision, and they also assume the responsibility for the cost.  However, you, and they are shameless enough to ask me to pay the bill $82.50 that they acquired due to their low professional standard and due to their mismanagement of Salish Village. 

Moreover, it is the common business practice, and it is also required by law that all taxable business and personal expenses have to be documented.  Therefore, I am asking you, lord Oppfelt, to submit to my company Glen Spirit that is responsible for the “salishvillage.glenspirit.com” website the following items:

  1. McCue & Associates’ initial order spelling the purpose and extend of the required services. 
  2. The copy of James Strichartz’s Law offices e-mail that they sent on January 15, 2009 to the webhost that hosts my company’s website. 
  3. Webhost’s response to their above mentioned e-mail. 
  4. James Strichartz’s Law offices written result of their evaluation of the website in question. 
  5. Clearly pointed the part of the said websites that should case the alleged "nuisance."
  6. The itemized list of specific damages that the said websites allegedly caused to Salish Village property. 

Without these items, it looks to me that McCue & Associates hired the James Strichartz’s Law offices with the intent to coerce my company’s webhost into their termination of services that they provide. 
Therefore, McCue & Associates’, and your, request for the payment for such a dubious evaluation is nothing but another form of harassment designed to protect those two villainous sexual predators Dulis and Mason, and to drive me out from my home in Salish Village.  If McCue & Associates want to exercise some Salish Village rules, then they should bill those two villains sexual predators Dulis and Mason, because they are the rood of entire problem!!! 
For all above, I wouldn’t even consider paying a single penny for this dubious evaluation, and I think that I don’t need to spell-out for you what you should do with the bill of $82.50 that you try to pass on me!  If you would send me such a bill in the future, please print it on the toilet paper to have at least some use for it. 

If I wouldn’t know that you are shrewish, and if you wouldn’t tell me before that you love to lie, twist, and backstab the people that you don’t like, and that it is the part of your nature to do that (and I’d say that you have it probably deeply coded in your genes), I’d believe that you are complete idiot when you come on me with such a request!!! 

By the way, do you remember our hours-long discussion on November 26, 2008? 
Do you remember that you have come to my home, and were persuading me so vehemently to drop my intend to inform the Salish Village homeowners that their property is managed by two villainous sexual predators Dulis and Mason, that in the effort to bend me down you have even revealed the dark folds of your personality, and tried to persuade me that the lying, twisting and backstabbing is the best way to deal with the other people? 
Do you remember that you have tried to persuade me that lying, twisting and backstabbing bring the sweet result, and instead of going straightforward I should use the backstabbing strategy in dealing with Dulis and Mason? 
Do you remember that I told you that I am a straight shooter that was brought-up on very different set of values, and although I know that this strategy often works best I wouldn’t change my personality according your suggestions? 
Do you remember that you told me that I’m foolish, and described me how rewarding it would be for me to trip them up, and then calmly sit back and watch them how they are being fried? 
If you have already forgotten on your revelations, and on the unsolicited lesson that you gave me, I hope that the above would refresh your memory.  I’ll not forgot on your educational visit for the rest of my life, because from that time I knew that I have grossly miss-categorized you when I have considered you a decent and honest man. 
Unfortunately, in the same way I have before miss-categorized the disgraceful scavenging SOB Mason, but after your revelation I have realized that you belong to the same category with him and with the egoistic chauvinist and sexual maniac Dulis as well. 

Coincidently, my company Glen Spirit has the set of rules and policies similar to those adopted by the Salish Village HOA that you have so kindly spelled for me.  Dolorously, the villainous sexual predator Craig Dulis and equally villainous and on top of that scavenging sexual predator Carl Mason, both acting under authority of representatives of Salish Village HOA, destroyed not just my marriage but also my wife’s and my company. 
Due to their deplorable action, the sizable initial investment into that company became useless, and we have been deprived of hundreds of thousands dollars profit projected for the four quarter of 2008 and for the first quarter of 2009. 
Initially, I have considered absorbing of the loses in the framework of my ex-wife’s and my divorce, and for the sake of justice and the possible future victims of those two villains Dulis and Mason, I have only intended to achieve their discharge from the top ranked positions that they hold in Salish Village. 
Regrettably, instead of being outraged by their despicable, illegal, and socially dangerous behavior, and instead of supporting me in my effort, the McCue & Associates, and you, have decided to protect them and to force me into the role of a fall guy.  Instead of taking the legally and ethically correct steps, you, and they, become mounting the one despicable and damaging action against me on top of the other. 

Your lying, twisting, and backstabbing is obviously your personal style, and in a different situation it couldn’t be even my business how you relate to the other people, lord Oppfelt.  However, your harassing me and mocking me, and your cynical reaction to my physical damages and to my pain and suffering that I have endured due to the gross mismanagement of the Salish Village property, and due to your personal bestiality, that is a very different brand.  McCue & Associates’ failure to take the proper action, and their and yours calling to my strive for basic justice a "nuisance" is downright arrogant, and it indicates that you intend to continue in hassling me, and in providing of the support and cover for those two villains in question!!!
Being fed-up of you and McCue & associates pushing me around, I have changed my mind, and in addition to my intend to have those two villains discharged from their top positions that they abuse in multiple ways, I am also requesting the reimbursement for damages that you; McCue & Associates; President for Salish Village HOA, and the maintenance manager for Salish Village HOA both acting under authority of Salish Village HOA, have corporately caused me, and my company. 

 The cumulative bill for those damages is now $1,750,000, and is payable immediately. 

In this point, I don’t really care how you will divide this bill among yourselves.  Only, I need to tell you is, that later the itemized bill will go much higher, and will also include the reasonable interest; the court fees; the lawyers’ fees; and all other fees that would be necessary to pay in order to force you to reimburse me, and my company for damages that you have corporately caused. 
This reimbursement, however, shouldn’t be in any way interpreted as giving up my right, and my intend to inform the Salish Village homeowners about the disgusting activities that are going on right under their nose. 

 Since you, and McCue & Associates, insist that all matter related to Salish Village must go through you, I’m asking you to pass this letter on the Salish Village HOA, as well as on the McCue & Associates.  Then, I’ll deal with each of you separately! 
If you’ll fail to do so, and within three days I’ll not receive from the Salish Village HOA and from McCue & Associates the written confirmation that they received this letter, them on March 4, 2009, I’ll send them this letter and the reasoning for my bill by myself. 

I don't intend to lecture you, or McCue and Associates how the Internet works, and assume that you both know that unless the website is properly promoted it just stays on the WWW as the one of millions trees in the giant forest.  Such a site pups up only on somebody who knows where is located, or runs into it by a chance.  This applies especially to the websites located on sub-domains. 
Most webhosts provide the GUI that allows the webmaster to monitor the number of hits, as well as the visitors of the particular website, which in turn could be used for evaluation of the promoting strategies.  So far, the salishvillage.glenspirit.com was intended to be seen only by the Salish Village homeowners, and by the other residents that I would notify about its existence via regular mail, and I could see that beside of you, and of my other adversaries, the site doesn’t receive many visitors. 

Posting of the website on the top-level domain is expensive, but it increases the chances that the site would be picked up by the search engines and would be properly prioritized.  Therefore, posting of the website on the top-level domain is the first and absolutely necessary step for conveying of serious matter.  Although, this dramatically increases the number of hits, it is still not a complete substitute for the active promotion that I’ll do if my attempt of settlement should fail. 

For these reasons, it is fair to advice you, and McCue and Associates, that I have secured for myself, and for my company, the top level domains dedicated not just to the Salish Village, but also to you, lord Oppfelt, and to them. 
The selected domain names guarantee that during the search, the link along the brief description of my pages will be displayed right next to the link and the brief description of the pages of the searched entity.  In the other words, if for instance somebody would search for the managing companies, or would type the search string “McCue & Associates,” the links to their and to my pages will always be displayed one next to the other, or close to each other.  It’s needless to say that my brief descriptions would be eye-catching, in order to attract the maximum viewers.  Moreover, within relatively short time the domains and the related websites will proliferate across the WWW and will be included into all kind of registers and advisory services. 
I believe that people have the right to know with whom they are really dealing, or intend to do their business, and in addition to the sites that try to isolate the shabby businesses, my company’s sites and I would provide an invaluable service for them. 

Because you are something else, lord Oppfelt, and with absolutely no regards for laws and for the other human being you have become the voluntary ruthless hit-man for those two villains Dulis and Mason, as well as for mismanaging McCue & Associates, and had singlehandedly brought me into the near death situation, I have purchased not just one but two domains for you. 
Since you use the names Coldwell Banker Danforth, and Pacific Crest Group, and use our professional position in those two companies in order to gain the powerful advantage while you are dealing with me, I want to make sure that maximum people would learn the truths about you, and would know who you really are before they would do any business with you. 
Moreover, it would be your job to explain to the CEOs of those two companies why you are using their names in correlation with your frivolous violation of laws and rules, and how your disgusting personal ethics and your rotten professional integrity impacts on them. 

The domains/websites names are:
salishvillage.com

coldwellbankerdanforth.biz
pacificcrestgroup.biz
mccueandassociates.biz

Please, feel free to check them out, and notice that there are not any names and addresses published, yet!  However, they would be there, along with the other information, in the moment when you, or McCue & Associates, or Salish Village HOA, or any of your henchmen would make a wrong move.  The domains are legitimately purchased and are legally valid; therefore, you and McCue don’t need to even bother to waste the money on their professional evaluation.  If you, or they would, then you know what to do with the bill. 
If you, or McCue & Associates, or the Salish Village HOA would hesitate to accept the proposed settlement, these domains, and the fully developed websites residing on them, would go on the auction sale on E-bay as well as on the other commercial sites.  They would be interconnected, but neither of you don’t need to get excited because there wouldn’t be any illegal statements or information.  There would be only the authentic documents, and the truth story about despicable treatment that my already coerced ex-wife, and I, have received in Salish Village. 
However, the starting bid for the individual packages would be so high that they would be auctioned for very long time.  But what’s the heck!  If I couldn’t sell them fast, their selling would be at least a useful promotion for them.  And of course, you would be always welcomed to make a responsible bid. 

As to the conclusion, I need to remind you, lord Oppfelt, that if you’ll not reimburse me for damages that you have intentionally caused to my health, in addition to the above, I’ll also inform your future tenant(s) about your villainous personal quality and about your putrid professional integrity. 
Also, I need to remind all of you that I have taken the proper precautions in the case that any of you, or any of your henchmen would try to harm me. 

Oli P. Glenn

From: Chris Oppfelt
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 3:25 PM
To: Illtreated

Oli:

If you are going to make a claim for damages to other individuals or entities or make threats to cause them harm, you need to communicate such claims and threats directly to them.  I am your landlord only.  I have no obligation to be the conduit for communicating your personal matters to the parties you reference in your email.
From: Illtreated
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:49 AM
To: Chris Oppfelt

Lord Oppfelt!
 
I acknowledge your position, and I will pursue you, and them, base on it.  My question is, however, what happened to your and Mr. McCue's stern order to communicate all issues related to Salish Village through you?  Are you zigzagging again? 
Since I have to go tomorrow to the still another unexpected surgery, and the stress related to your, and their, malicious actions could cause me even bigger harm and could even kill me, I have to postpone my planned action.  But I am promising you, lord Oppfelt, if I would survive I will get justice and the proper repercussions for you, as well as for them. 
 
Oli P. Glenn

MY THIRD HARASSMENT COMPLAINT AND OPPFELT'S CREEPY RESPONSES

AGAIN, I WASN'T SO NAIVE TO BELIEVE THAT THIS BLOODY CREEP WOULD DO ANYTHING WITH MY THIRD COMPLAINT.  BUT SAME AS BEFORE, I HAVE FILED IT WITH HIM IN ORDER TO PREVENT HIM TO PLAY STUPID AND TO LIE THAT HE WASN'T AWARE OF THEIR CONTINUING HARASSMENT, AND ALSO TO SATISFY FORMAL REQUIREMENTS AND TO HAVE EVERYTHING DOCUMENTED. 

MY THIRD HARASSMENT COMPLAINT AND OPPFELT'S CREEPY RESPONSES - INITIAL INFORMATION - COMING SOON

From:  Illtreated
Sent:
Thursday, September 17, 2009 22:09
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Kirkland September 17, 2009

To:  Chris Oppfelt, landlord
13023 NE 32nd Pl, Bellevue, WA 98005

From:  Oli P. Glenn 
12406 NE 130th Ct, Unit J206, Kirkland, WA 98034

RE:  Formal Complaint on Threats, Harassment and willful obstruction of Usufruct

Landlord Oppfelt; 

Deplorably, you have failed to act on my previous formal complaint that I have filed with you on President for Salish Village HOA Craig Dulis, and on manager for Salish Village HOA Carl Mason on December 27, 2008.  From that time, I am being continuously harassed, provoked, mocked, threatened and slandered by them, and by the scores of their mostly dubious friends that frequent the manager Mason’s apartment and gather on the patio that faces to my kitchen window.  Some of them are known illegal immigrants and drug traffickers with the longstanding ties to them. 

On June 11, 2009, I have informed the Pinnacle Service Company, in writing, about President Dulis’ and manager Mason’s abuses of their professional positions in Salish Village and also about damages that they inflicted on me.  Then, on June 15, 2009, I have attempted to resolve the problem that they created in Salish Village with Pinnacle’s representatives in person. 
However, because it was President Dulis and manager Mason who dropped the Salish Village to Pinnacle Service Company’s portfolio, the Pinnacle’s representatives were already tangled with them by some “handsome” deals, and allegedly because I’m not a homeowner they refused to even speak with me.  President Dulis and manager Mason always bragged that they actually are, all by themselves, entire Salish Village HOA.  Therefore, firing of McCue & Associates and hiring of Pinnacle Service Company could be considered as the part of their scheme. 
Consequently, at that time the Pinnacle’s representatives definitely also knew that you have become Dulis’, Mason’s and McCue’s enthusiastic hit-man, and in the clear attempt to stonewall me they cynically advised me to file the complaint with Pinnacle through my landlord. 
In the other words, I should file my complaint with them trough the individual that willfully acts on Dulis’ and Mason’s behalf, already caused me enormous damages, and even attempted to cause my premature death - to murder me in the sneaky way.  What the arrogant crap!!! 

Moreover, to re-file my complaint with you, again, would definitely not do any good because in addition to the multitude of damages that you have inflicted on me before, you had claimed in the court of law that I definitely have some mental issues and continuously describe me as a crazy old man that need some psychiatric help. 
Since you continue in slandering me, it makes me wonder what according you constitutes my craziness, and what gave you the right and reason to mock me and to publically degrade me. 
Is it, according you, crazy to take the marriage vow seriously and based on it build my wife’s and my future?  Or, it is crazy to pursue the villains that intruded into my home and wickedly abused their professional positions on taking of the indecent advantage of my wife and frivolously destroyed everything what I had been striving for?  Or, it is according you crazy to be old, and to be not as helpless as you, and Dulis, Mason and McCue had expected?  Whatever it is, landlord Oppfelt, your slanders and your wicked actions speak about you, as well as their slanders and their wicked actions speak about them! 

Regrettably, but not unexpectedly, from that time there were countless new cases of harassment and provocations by manager Mason, President Dulis and by their friends.  Their harassment and provocations ranged from their provocative greetings and facial expressions to their derogatory remarks; to their provocative and derogatory jibing; to their mocking and provocative sounds; to their middle finger showing; to their imaginary gun pointing on me and to my kitchen window; to their harassing and threatening phone calls; and to manager Mason’s and President Dulis’ slandering me as I would be a racist and anti-Jewish bigot; and to their open threats. 
Being encouraged by yours and Pinnacle’s stonewalling me, they, and their dubious friends escalate their deplorable actions against me and deliberately hamper my life.  Same as you, they prevent me to peacefully use the property that I’m leasing from you, and severely limit my usufruct just because I make no secret of the fact that I’m determined to bring them to justice, and because I exercise my right to the free speech and to free expression. 

While I am acting in boundaries of law, and in the attempt to enforce the Salish Village rules and applicable laws, they violate them and try to coerce me to acceptance of their crimes and of their wrongdoings.  Therefore, it is intolerable that the Salish Village HOA and Pinnacle Service Company maintain and even promote those individuals, and ignore the fact that they used, and continue to use, their high positions in Salish Village on their willful inflicting of irreversible material, emotional and physical damages on the Salish Village resident(s).  It is also intolerable that the Salish Village HOA and Pinnacle Service Company violate the Salish Village rules, and allow those individuals to be presented on the Salish Village property, and it is imperative that you are, as the landlord, obligated to initiate the corrective action!  

Since the Mason’s sister landlord doesn’t want to have her, and her daughter and her boyfriend Bob (who is according to Mason a heavy drag user) in his unit anymore, from August 1, 2009 they moved to Mason’s apartment.  Deplorably, although all units in the Salish Village have same standards, unlike you who illegally prevent me to even have a live-in aid, Mason’s landlord tolerates the 5 essentially unrelated people living in his unit.  Currently, there actually live 2 families in manager Mason’s apartment, and while he abuses his position in Salish Village, they use the Salish Village HOA rooms and facilities as would be their private.  In addition, I believe that their landlord doesn’t pay for them, and that also doesn’t pay the double fee for wear and tear, and for water and sewer as well. 

Outrageously, manager Mason’s apartment is trafficked from that time by even more dubious people, who many of them shouldn’t be here in the United States on the first place, and in addition to President Dulis and manager Mason, they openly display their hateful hostility toward me.  This situation is intolerable, and forces me to biff up my security.  It also forces me to caution you, and to ask you to make a note of it, that any of their further adverse action against me would be met with the immediate and decisive response. 
Since you, and McCue & Association, helped to create this regrettable situation, and the Pinnacle Service Company willfully maintains it, and by promoting of those two villainous individuals actually encourages their further hostile actions, the possible dire consequences of the escalating conflict will go exclusively to your and their account. 

As you know, or should know, the Salish Village HOA is responsible for President Dulis’ and Manager Mason’s behavior, and in turn, they are responsible for the behavior of their friends on Salish Village property.  Although their and their friends’ behavior may please you, they willfully violate the Salish Village rules as well as the common laws.  Therefore, I am asking you to pursue in my complaint as you are, as the landlord, obligated to do so. 

Because I doubt that you will ever attempt to initiate the fair resolution of deplorable situation that they, and you, have created in Salish Village, I also need to advise you that if you would fail to act on this complaint, as you did on my previous verbal and written complaints that I have filed with you before, and if together with the Pinnacle Service Company would not resolve the problem fairy, then this letter would be used against them, but primarily against you in the court of law. 

Sincerely,
Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Friday, September 18, 2009 15:47
To:  Illtreated

Oli:

Please put me in touch with your legal counsel so I can clarify my responsibilities vis-a-vis the situation you've put yourself in and your latest complaints. 

Chris
From:  Illtreated
Sent: 
Friday, September 18, 2009 17:15
To:   Chris Oppfelt

Landlord Oppfelt; 

Same old twists?  Please, clarify what you mean by your statement "...situation you've put yourself."  I don't have any counselor with whom I could put you in touch at this time.  This however doesn't anyhow reduce your landlord's responsibilities.  Please, clarify your responsibilities with your counselor, and take the proper action on my complaint as you are required by law and by the Salish Village rules. 

Oli P. Glenn    

From:    Illtreated
Sent:  Friday, September 18, 2009 17:44
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Landlord Oppfelt;

There is one more issue to resolve.  Numerous times I have asked you, in person and in writing, to stop addressing me by my first name, only.  You, however, cynically disregard my requests, and thus demonstrate your disrespect for me as for your tenant as well as for a human being.  

I'm almost twice that old as you are, and unfortunately you have proved to be a person with which I wouldn't ever like to maintain any amicability. 
Therefore, for you I'm either Oli Glenn, or a Mr. Glenn, or a tenant Glenn if you wish!  Your next addressing me by my first name, only, would be considered as just another form of you willful harassment and mockery and together with this written request would be used against you accordingly.

Oli P. Glenn 

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Friday, September 18, 2009 17:49
To:  Illtreated

Oli:

No twists.  Just reality.  There is no action I can take.
From:   Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Friday, September 18, 2009 18:01
To:  Illtreated

Oli:

If you don't like me addressing you by your first name all the more reason to let me dialogue directly with your legal counsel for all future communications.

Thank you.
Chris

From:  Illtreated
Sent:  Saturday, September 19, 2009 13:11
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Landlord Oppfelt!

Representative of Pinnacle Service Company which is responsible for managing of Salish Village from outside insisted that, as a tenant, I must file my complaint with them through my landlord.  Beside that, you are also obligated to pass my complaint on the Salish Village HOA.  This, quite obviously, would not do any good, since the said perpetrators frequently bragged that they are actually entire Salish Village HOA, but the Pinnacle Service Company may be willing to step forward and take the corrective action in compliance with the law and Salish Village rules.  By your refusal to pass my September 18, 2009 complaint on them, you willfully violate the law and the Salish Village rules and maliciously prevent any possible resolution of the regrettable situation that you have so enthusiastically helped to create. 

By preventing the fair remedy, you continue to obstruct my usufruct and inflict still new damages on me.  Your refusal to proceed in my complaint is just another instance of the constructive eviction to which you are subjecting me, and of your attempt to force me to jump my 5-years lease that I have signed with you.  Doing so, you assume the solo responsibility for the possibly dire consequences of your unlawful inactions. 

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Illtreated
Sent:  Saturday, September 19, 2009 13:29
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Landlord Oppfelt!

Numerous times I have cautioned you that under given circumstances your further addressing me by my first name is untoward, and that your disrespectful continuing in this manner is nothing but the willful harassment.  However, in your last messages you are addressing me by my first name again!  This clearly demonstrate the willful and illegal harassment, and it also speaks about you and about your attempt to maximize the damages that you have already inflicted on me! 
Your constant harassment, and your constant conditioning of the fulfillment of your landlord duties and responsibilities by the unfounded, unlawful and mocking requests of speaking with my counselor will have the proper legal consequences for you.  Then, you would have the chance to speak with my counsel at your cost. 

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Oddbuster
Sent:  Saturday, September 19, 2009 13:56
To:   Chris Oppfelt

Landlord Oppfelt!

In my previous message, I have asked you to explain what you mean by your statement "...situation you've put yourself," in your Friday, September 18, 2009 3:47 PM message.  However, you have failed to do so!  Therefore, I'm asking you, again, to explain what you meant by this statement. 

Oli P. Glenn

From:   Chris Oppfelt
Sent: 
Saturday, September 19, 2009 14:38
To:  Illtreated

Oli:

Having been an eyewitness to you getting caught lying under oath in the Superior Court of Washington, I hope you can appreciate that I am well aware of your blatant & complete disregard for the truth.  So, again, please put me in touch with your legal counsel so I can clarify my responsibilities vis-a-vis the situation you put yourself in.

Chris

From:   Illtreated
Sent:  
Sunday, September 20, 2009 02:43
To:   Chris Oppfelt

Landlord Oppfelt!

Please revise your conversation with me and keep the focus on the subject.  Also, don't address me by my first name only and don’t try to divert attention from your willful violation of your landlord's duties by the utterly false accusation and keep communication with me on civilized manner. 
It is obvious that you are getting nervous because you have run out of the space to zigzag!!!  And, as the crooks always do when they are cornered, instead to do what you are required to do by law, and by the Salish Village rules, you have chosen to knock me down by your vicious attack and by your blatant lies.  However, it wouldn't work landlord Oppfelt, not at this time!!! 

If I would be ever lying, then I would just follow your urgent advice to lie, lie, lie, twist, twist, twist, and to backstab, backstab, backstab.  Do you remember?  It was your best advice, and you vehemently wanted me to follow it when I have decided to confront those two sexual predators and racketeers President for Salish Village HOA Craig Dulis and manager Carl Mason head on and you were so afraid that it could reduce your lousy property value!!!  Do your remember that I have refused to follow your crappy advice, and had assured you that I'm a straight shooter and would fight them without giving up my moral values and my dignity?  I wasn't lying, and I wasn't lying under oath, but you and your protégés were!!!  That is also that "...situation I've put myself," as you wrote me on September 18, 2009 3:47 PM, and which despite of my repeated requests doesn't want to specify!!!  

Because I didn't let you to coerce me, and to paralyze me by your threads and by your malicious actions that you and your accomplices took against me, and have begun pursuing your above named protégés instead, you have started sticking of your dirty nose into my marriage and into my private affairs.  Then, you have lured from me my wife's e-address, and had grossly violated our agreement of the open three-polar communication.  Since being crooked is your truth nature (you have told me that about yourself before), you had began your illicit to communication with her and behind my back you have wickedly aggravated her against me. 
Then, you have plotted with those two above named villains against me, together with them had coached my  bribed, coerced and mixed-up wife to fraudulent obtaining of the bogus Protective Order, and tried to set me for its violation and put me in jail.  Moreover, you also took the wicked advantage of my medical and emotional crisis and tried to even kill me!!!   That is, in brief, the "situation in which I've put myself," landlord Oppfelt!!!  And that is also the reason why you couldn't explain your statement!!! 

However, your slip of the tongue clearly documents your position, and together with your previous statements of similar nature that you have also failed to explain, it just compliments your malicious intend and your determination to make the life miserable for me, to force me to jump the lease that I have signed with you, and to even kill me.  But of course, since you are sleek you would do that in the sleek way as you have already tried it before.  But it may be that I'm wrong, because I know that the individual of your type is capable to do anything. 
So, stop lying, twisting and slandering me, and remember that the utterly ill judgment handed down by the profoundly bias Superior Court Judge HARRY McCARTHY was completely reversed, and that the whole charade with the bogus Protective Order is well documented in my website.  Also, keep in mind that your attempt to abuse the justice system for your wicked purposes backfired, and just demonstrated your and your buddies wickedness. 

Once again, I urge you, landlord Oppfelt to explain what you meant by your statement "...situation you've put yourself" in your September 18, 2009 3:47 PM e-mail and to stop addressing me by my first name, only.  Instead of spitting on me your poisoned saliva, fulfill your obligation and pass my September 17, 2009 complaint on the Pinnacle Service Company that is responsible for handling of Salish Village affairs, and give them the chance to resolve this unsustainable situation fairly. 

Oli P. Glenn 

OPPFELT SLANDERS ME AND ACCUSES ME OF LYING

THE BLOODY TWISTER AND POSSIBLY PATHOLOGIC LIAR LANDLORD OPPFELT WANTS TO DRAG ME DOWN ON HIS STUMPY LEVEL, AND ACCUSES ME OF LYING UNDER OATH DURING THE "KANGAROO COURT" HEARING ON  JANUARY 20, 2009, CONCERNING MY PETITION FOR THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AGAINST HIM AND ALSO AGAINST HIS BUDDIES MASON AND DULIS!!!  IT WAS A TROUBLING SHOWCASE OF DEPLORABLE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE, SKILLFULLY ARRANGED BY THE WEIRD AND UTTERLY BIAS JUDGE FOR SEATTLE - KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, HARRY McCARTHY

TO SEE HOW IT REALLY WAS, AND WHAT HAD ACTUALLY HAPPENED THERE ON JANUARY 20, 2009, CLICK THIS LINK AND REFER TO THE SECTION "KANGAROO COURT STAGE II,".

PLEASE, NOTE THAT I HAVE NOT RESPONDED TO THE LAST OF OPPFELT'S GROSSLY SLANDERING MESSAGES.  I DIDN'T BOTHER TO TO THAT, BECAUSE I ALREADY KNOW THAT HE IS A BLOODY SCOUNDREL AND ALWAYS HAS TO HAVE HIS LAST CROOKED WORD.  SINCE HE WOULD NEVER STOP RUNNING HIS CROOKED MOUTH , I DIDN'T WANT TO WASTE THE TIME ON THE FRUITLESS CHATTING WITH HIM.

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Sunday, September 20, 2009 09:35
To:  Illtreated

Oli:

You can choose to deny you were caught lying in the Superior Court of Washington but I was an eyewitness to it and have retained copies of the court records which prove it.   How can you possibly expect me to believe anything you say? 

Chris

From:   Illtreated
Sent:  Sunday, September 20, 2009 15:15
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Landlord Oppfelt! 

It is utterly ridiculous at its face when the accomplished liar, twister and lies-pusher talks about witnessing of somebody's lies.  We have already been there, landlord Oppfelt, and I have recorded those events, and your lies, and I have published the copies of the court documents on Internet.  They demonstrate that your bumbling about your eye witnessing of my lying in the Superior Court of Washington is just a product of your twisted mind and of your wicked imagination.  They also demonstrate that you just can't overstep your own shadow, and that you just blow bubbles and lie, again!!!  

To refresh your memory, I would like to point you to the http://salishvillage.com website, particularly to the http://salishvillage.com/landlord_from_hell/landlord_from_hell_main.htm and to the January 20 entry at http://salishvillage.com/updates/updates_main.htm

The fact that, despite of my numerous requests, you cynically continue in violation of the landlord-tenant laws, and of the Persons With Disability Act, and of the whole hoist of the other laws and rules; and the fact that you refuse to do the basic maintenance in you your unit; and the fact that you deny me the basic tenant rights; and the fact that despite of my numerous requests you continue to harass me and to degrade me by addressing me by my first name only; and the fact that you try to avoid the answer to my simple request to explain what you meant by your statement "...situation you've put yourself";  and the fact that you try to block the due process speaks loudly and inequitably about you and about your intention to harm me, landlord Oppfelt.  But it wouldn't happen as this time, and your and your protégés wicked actions wouldn't go without paying of the due price!!!   

Moreover, regardless of what you drivel, the fact is that you are not competent to make a decision in my complaint, and that you use, again, your old cheep divertive tricks and wickedly block the due process as it was described to me by the representative of the Pinnacle Service Company that manages Salish Village from outside and is responsible for handling of Salish Village affairs. 

Therefore, I am asking you again.  Landlord Oppfelt, just pass my complaint on the Pinnacle Managing Company, and regardless of what your believe or disbelieve, let them to deal with the creepy situation that your protégés, and you, have created in Salish Village. 

Also, stop addressing me by my first name only, and don’t forget to explain, in details, what you meant by your statement  "...situation you've put yourself".   

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Sunday, September 20, 2009 20:05
To:  Illtreated

Oli:

You lied while under oath in the Superior Court of Washington and got caught.   You can try all you want to deny it but that won't change what happened.  It is a shame you can't comprehend how your total lack of credibility and your blatant disregard for the truth was completely exposed at the hearing.

If you won't tell the truth while under oath how can you expect anyone to believe anything you say when: (a) it involves the same subject matter and, (b) you are not now under oath and thus not subject to the repercussions from committing perjury.

Trying to lie your way out of the situation that you, and you alone, put yourself in and are responsible for is not going to work.

Chris

From:   Illtreated
Sent:  Monday, September 21, 2009 00:24
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Blah, blah blah, landlord Oppfelt!!!  That’s just what you say!!! 

I didn't lie, and I don't lie, and that's why you couldn't come up with anything specific and just dribble same old slanders.  I have recorded and documented all in my websites, and your completely false accusations are just your spiteful attempt to divert attention from the actual issue.  However, I already told you that it wouldn't work at this time!!! 

It is obvious that being sand-blinded by your arrogance you have cornered yourself, can't come up with anything sensible, and are afraid that a miracle could happen and the Pinnacle Service Company might try to resolve this regrettable issue fairly.  Therefore, this message is to conclude this issue WITH YOU, and there wouldn't be any further response to your childish slandering, regardless of  what other nonsense you'd write. 
However, when you are so nice and righteous, then why you continue to harass me and degrade me by addressing me by my first name only, why you doesn't answer the simple question what you meant by your statement  "...situation you've put yourself," and why you doggedly block the due process and refuse to pass my complaint on the Pinnacle Service company?   I have spelled out your truth reasons in my websites, and I don't feel that there is any good reason why I should repeat myself. 

Just stop blabbing your nonsense, do your landlord's duties, stop addressing me by my first name only, pass my complaint from September 17, 2009, 10:09 PM on the Pinnacle Service Company, and let them decide what they would do in this matter.  
As I said above, if you don't have anything constructive to say to the subjected matter then you don't need to bother to respond.  Your next crooked message would remain unanswered, would be just included into the array of your previous spiteful messages, and would serve as the prove of your unprofessional, reckless and malicious behavior in the court of law. 

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Monday, September 21, 2009 07:32
To:  Illtreated

Oli:

Let's leave it where we started.  As I indicated below: "Please put me in touch with your legal counsel so I can clarify my responsibilities vis-a-vis the situation you've put yourself in and your latest complaints."
Your refusal to engage a competent advisor to represent you is perplexing.  A conversation with your legal counsel would be very brief -- perhaps a couple minutes only.  There is no reason you shouldn't be willing to arrange for this.
Chris

From:   Illtreated
Sent:  Monday, September 21, 2009 15:35
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Landlord Oppfelt,

The legal counsels that advise me in this issue before I would hire a trial lawyer and will take you, and the Salish Village HOA, and the McCue & Associates to the court told me that there is NOT any practical or justifiable reason why any of them should speak with you.  All of them consider your requests as capricious, derogatory and legally and constructive unfounded.  Since you are not a lawyer, and had never indicated that you have a degree in the legal field, your request is just a puffy and arrogant diversion, in my view.   It also speaks loudly about you as a person.   If I would be as arrogant and puffy as you are, I would request the same from you. 

Since you left behind the long trail of your wicked and malicious actions, and have clearly demonstrated your unwillingness to resolve the issue in the conciliatory manner, I'll instruct my future trial lawyer to not waste the time on any negotiation with you and to take you straight to the court.  There, you would have opportunity to clarify your position, and your assumption about your responsibilities in the situation into which, as you cynically claim, I have put myself. 

Also, you would need to explain there how I put myself into the situation which the villainous sexual predators and racketeers President for SV HOA Craig Dulis and manager Carl Mason created in SV, and which you have aggravated to the current level by the multitude of your coercive and malicious actions.  Moreover, you would need to explain there why you ignore your landlord duties, why you violate the applicable laws, and why despite of my multiple requests to not to do that, because based on my creed and on my cultural values it constitutes the degrading harassment, you continue in harassing me and in degrading me by your persistent addressing me by my first name only.  This speaks loudly about you as a person as well. 

Regrettably, you have always before blocked any just and peaceful resolution of the abysmal situation that your protégés created in Salish Village, and it is obvious that the further correspondence with you in this matter would be just wasting of time.  The trail of the messages that I've exchanged with you after I've filed with you my complaint clearly documents that I made all reasonable attempts to have you to pass my complaint on the Pinnacle Service Company as its representative instructed me. 

Therefore, I'm ending this fruitless correspondence with you with the acknowledgement that you will not cooperate in this matter as you should do that as my landlord, and that you will not pass my complaint from September 17, 2009 on the Pinnacle Service Company that manages the SV from outside, as its representative suggested. 

Please, make a note that there wouldn't be any further response to your next stonewalling messages! 

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Monday, September 21, 2009 20:35
To:  Illtreated

Oli:

You can say you want to get your complaint resolved but your inaction strongly suggests the contrary.  Why are you so resistant to arranging a few minute conversation between me and your legal counsel?  Did you really get "advice" from anyone?  Your email comments suggest not.

You were caught lying under oath in the Superior Court of Washington on January 20, 2009 and I have no doubt you will be caught again if/when you take your oath.  I gave the judge an out so as not to nail you for perjury last January.  I won't be so kind next time. 

Going to court will be a welcome alternative to watching you try to lie and bully your way out of the situation you've put yourself in.
Chris 

REQUEST FOR THE PAID RENT RECEIPT - OPPFELT'S CREEPY RESPONSES

THE BLOODY SHYSTER LORD-LANDLORD OPPFELT REFUSED TO GIVE ME THE RECEIPT FOR THE RENT THAT I'VE PAID TO HIM.  HE IS OBLIGATED TO DO THAT BY LAW, BUT ONCE AGAIN, HE HAS HAD PROVED TO BE A BLOODY PUFFY CREEP THAT BEHAVES AS HE STILL WOULD BE IN HIS NATIVE UKRAINE.  IT IS OBVIOUS THAT HE THINKS THAT THE AMERICAN LAWS DON'T APPLY TO HIM. 

AT THE TIME OF SIGNING OF THE LEASE, MY AT-THAT-TIME-WIFE, AND I, TOLD HIM THAT WE ARE BOOTH DISABLED AND THAT WE ARE JUST ON THE FIXED INCOME THAT WOULDN'T EVEN COVER THE RENT.  HOWEVER, WE ALSO TOLD HIM THAT WE WORK HARD ON THE LUCRATIVE VENTURE WHICH WOULD CONSIDERABLY IMPROVE OUR SITUATION REALLY SOON.  
UNFORTUNATELY, ONLY TWO MONTHS LATER, HIS VILLAINOUS BUDDIES - PRESIDENT FOR SV HOA CRAIG DULIS AND MANAGER CARL MASON SCREWED MY FIFE, AND TOGETHER WITH THE McCUE & ASSOCIATES RUINED ALL OUR PLANS.  DEPLORABLY, BLOODY OPPFELT BECAME THEIR ENTHUSIASTIC HIT-MAN, GREATLY ENLARGED THE DAMAGES THAT HIS BUDDIES INFLICTED ON ME, AND HELPED THEM TO RUIN NOT JUST OUR BUSINESS VENTURE BUT ALSO MY LIFE. 

COMMENT TO HIS MESSAGE FROM Tuesday, October 06, 2009 18:12
DUE TO HIS, AND THEIR, OTHER UNETHICAL AND DOWNRIGHT ILLEGAL ACTIONS, I HAVE ACTUALLY QUALIFIED FOR THE FEDERAL SECTION 8 PROGRAM THAT SHOULD HELP ME WITH THE HIGH RENT.  THE RECEIPT FOR THE PAID RENT FOR WHICH I HAD ASKED HIM WAS REQUESTED BY THE KCHA, AS THE ONE OF THEIR CONDITIONS FOR INCLUDING ME INTO THIS PROGRAM.
NOW, HE INTENDS TO HUSH-UP HIS, AND THEIR, NUMEROUS LAW VIOLATIONS, AND HAS CONVENIENTLY FORGOTTEN ON OUR PLANS THAT WE HAD CONVEYED TO HIM.  HOWEVER, ONLY A COMPLETE FOOL WOULD BELIEVE HIM THAT HE WOULD EVER RENT US HIS UNIT, IF HE WOULDN'T KNOW THAT WE HAVE A SOUND PLAN TO IMPROVE OUR FINANCIAL SITUATION.; ALTERNATIVELY, IF HE WOULDN'T KNOW THAT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO OBTAIN THE GOVERNMENT HELP WITH THE RENT, IF EVERYTHING ELSE WOULD FAIL, AS I TOLD HIM. 

COMMENT TO HIS MESSAGE FROM Sunday, October 18, 2009 18:16
ALTHOUGH I HAVE HAD QUALIFIED FOR KCHA's HELP,  HE REASONS THAT I DON'T DESERVE TO BE INCLUDED INTO THAT PROGRAM BECAUSE (IN HIS CROOKED MIND) I HAVE ZERO CREDIBILITY, AND INSULTS ME BY HIS WICKED ASSERTION THAT I WANT TO DEFRAUD THE GOVERNMENT AGENCY AND GET THE HELP THAT I DON'T DESERVE.  HIS  MALICIOUS REFUSAL IS DOWNRIGHT ILLEGAL, AND HIS WICKED REASONING ILLUSTRATES WHAT KIND OF BLOODY, PUFFY, CREEP AND CALUMNIATOR HE ACTUALLY IS. 
HIS ILLEGAL MALICIOUS ACTION COSTS ME ABOUT $525 EACH MONTH, BUT THE BRIGHT SPOT ON THE WHOLE ISSUE IS THAT TO HAVE ZERO CREDIBILITY IN THE MIND OF THE PROVEN SHYSTER, ADMITTED LIAR, AND WICKED TWISTER AS HE IS, IT SOUNDS AS THE TRUTH COMPLIMENT TO ME!!!   NONETHELESS, THIS CREEP ONCE AGAIN ASSUMED THE RIGHT TO MALICIOUSLY INTERFERE INTO MY PRIVATE LIFE, AND WILLFULLY CAUSED ME STILL MORE HARM.  

COMMENT TO HIS MESSAGE FROM Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:26
BLOODY OPPFELT HAS HIS LANDLORD'S RIGHTS, OF COURSE.  AND HE HAS A LOT OF THEM.  HOWEVER, HE DOESN'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO INTERFERE INTO MY WIFE'S AND MINE PRIVATE AFFAIRS, AS HE DID SO ON BEHALF OF HIS PREDATORY PROTÉGÉS DULIS AND MASON THAT SCREWED HER AND RUINED OUR FUTURE. 
IT IS ALSO ILLEGAL FOR HIM TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST ME BECAUSE NOW I QUALIFY FOR THE SECTION 8 PROGRAM, AND TO SLANDER ME IN THE GOVERNMENT OFFICES AND TO SABOTAGE MY INCLUSION IN THAT PROGRAM. 

COMMENT TO HIS MESSAGE FROM Wednesday, October 07, 2009 07:49
KCHA DEFINITELY SCREENS BOTH THE LANDLORD AND THE TENANT.  IRONICALLY, KCHA's REQUIREMENTS ARE IDENTICAL, AND DO NOT EXCEED THE STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS THAT THIS CREEP SO FRIVOLOUSLY VIOLATES, BUT THEY DON'T GET INVOLVE INTO LANDLORD - TENANT DISPUTES. 

COMMENT TO HIS MESSAGE FROM Saturday, October 17, 2009 14:47
I REALLY DON'T KNOW WHY THIS BLOODY SOB ACCUSES ME OF CONCEALING OF THE FACTS THAT I HAVE COMPILED IN THIS WEBSITE.  IT IS NOT MY FAULT THAT THOSE TWO VILLAINS SEXUAL PREDATORS AND RACKETEERS DULIS AND MASON TURNED THE SALISH VILLAGE TO THE PLACE OF LIVING EVIL, SCREWED MY WIFE, AND  DESTROYED OUR MARRIAGE AND MY LIFE. 
IT IS ALSO NOT MY FAULT THAT MY ARROGANT LORD-LANDLORD TURNED TO BE AN ACCOMPLISHED SHYSTER AND EVENTUALLY BECAME THEIR HIT-MAN.  I HAVE THE 5-YEARS LEASE SIGNED WITH THIS TWISTED CREEP, AND I HAD TO COMPLETELY REFURBISH HIS RUNDOWN UNIT TO MAKE IT HABITABLE BEFORE WE HAD MOVED INTO THIS EVIL PLACE.  AND I DID IT FOR FREE WITH THE EXPECTATION THAT WE WOULD SPEND THERE AT LEAST 5 HAPPY YEARS. 
HE PURPOSELY TURNED THIS PLACE TO MY UNHAPPY HOME,  BUT THE LAW IS ON MY SIDE AND I HAVE NO REASON TO CONCEAL THAT I'M DETERMINED TO CLEANUP THIS PERVERT MANURE THERE AND GET JUSTICE FOR ALL!!! 

PLEASE, CLICK THIS LINK AND READ THE WHOLE STORY.

From: Illtreated
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 12:37
To: Chris Oppfelt
 
Landlord Oppfelt,
 
I need your signature on the Landlord Certification of Rent form, as requested by the Housing Authority.  For your convenience I could drop by today or tomorrow at your address to have you sign it.  Please, let me know me what day and time it would be good for you.  
 
Oli P Glenn
From: Chris Oppfelt
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 14:33
To: Illtreated
 
Mail it or fax it to me.

On Oct 5, 2009, at 12:37 PM, Illtreated wrote:
From: Illtreated
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 20:39
To: Chris Oppfelt

 
Landlord Oppfelt;
 
Three times I have tried to send you the form via facsimile, but the error always occurred during transmitting.  For this reason, I'm sending you the form as the attached MS Word document. 
Please, sing it and e-mail it to me back as the MS Word document as well.   
 
Thank you in advance,
Oli P. Glenn
From: Chris Oppfelt
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 09:18
To: Illtreated
Oli: I am not interested in participating in the KCHA Section 8 program.

Chris 

From: Illtreated
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:17
To: Chris Oppfelt

Landlord Oppfelt!

You may be not interested in participating in the section 8 program, but I'm.   The form that I have attached to the previous e-mail is exclusively about verification of my present monthly rent and doesn't create any obligation for you. 
Your refusal to sign this form is just another item to the long trail of your malicious actions against me and of your willful violating of my rights.  Therefore, I urge you to sign this form without further delay, and to e-mail it to me as the attachment as I have asked you.  

Oli P. Glenn

From: Chris Oppfelt
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:26
To: Illtreated
  Oli:
 
As landlord I do have certain rights.  One of them is choosing whether or not to participate in the KCHA Section 8 housing program.
Besides, Wendy is still a party to the lease agreement currently in place.
 
Chris
From: Illtreated
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 17:45
To: Chris Oppfelt

LANDLORD OPPFELT!

THE VERIFICATION OF THE FACT THAT I'M PAYING YOU THE RENT OF $750 PER MONTH IS IRRELEVANT TO THE FACT THAT WENDY IS NOW LEGALLY REGISTERED ON THE ADDRESS OF HER CROOKED BOYFRIEND AND WILLFULLY VIOLATES OUR LEASE.  SO FAR, YOU ARE ACCEPTING THE FULL RENT OF $750 JUST FROM ME, AND HER VIOLATION OF THE LEASE, AS WELL AS HER OBLIGATION TO PAY THE HALF OF THE RENT, WOULD BE RESOLVED IN THE UPCOMING SEPARATE LEGAL PROCESS AGAINST HER. 

MOREOVER, AT THE TIME OF SIGNING OF THE LEASE, WE HAVE INFORMED YOU, IN DETAILS, ABOUT OUR CHEERLESS ECONOMIC SITUATION AND ABOUT OUR LIMITED ABILITY TO PAY THE RENT JUST FROM OUR RESOURCES.  THAT WAS ALSO ONE OF THE MAIN REASONS WHY WE HAVE SIGNED THE 5-YEAR LEASE WITH YOU, AND WHY WE UNDERTOOK THE EXTENSIVE, FREE OF CHARGE REFURBISHMENT OF YOUR UNIT IN EXCHANGE FOR THE $750/MONTH RENT.  

HOWEVER, AT THAT TIME, I HAVE ALSO INFORMED YOU THAT WE HAVE THE AMBITIOUS PLANS THAT SHOULD IMPROVE OUR FUTURE ECONOMIC SITUATION, AND ON TOP OF THAT WE ARE ALSO WAITING FOR BEING ACCEPTED INTO THE SECTION 8 PROGRAM THAT WOULD PAY THE PART OF OUR RENT.  YOU UNDERSTOOD, THAT FOR THESE REASONS YOU DON'T NEED TO BE WORRY THAT WE WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PAY THE RENT EVEN IF OUR PLANS TO IMPROVE OUR FUTURE ECONOMIC SITUATION WOULD FAIL.

YOU HAVE ASSURED US THAT THIS WOULDN'T BE A PROBLEM, BECAUSE YOU DON'T MIND FROM WHERE THE MONEY WOULD COME, AS LONG AS THEY WOULD BE ON YOUR BANK ACCOUNT ON TIME.  YOU HAVE ALSO ASSURED US, THAT YOU WOULD BE HAPPY TO COOPERATE IN OBTAINING OF THE OUTSIDE HELP THAT WE WOULD NEEDED IN PAYING OF OUR RENT AND UTILITIES

YOU WERE ACTUALLY HELPING US BASED ON OUR VERBAL AGREEMENT, UNTIL THE COUPLE OF YOUR VILLAINOUS BUDDIES, THE PRESIDENT FOR SV HOA CRAIG DULIS, AND HIS ACCOMPLICE THE MANAGER FOR SV HOA CARL MASON SCREWED MY AT THAT TIME WIFE AND GROSSLY VIOLATED BOTH OF US.  THEN, YOU, AND THE OWNER OF THE McCUE & ASSOCIATES THAT MANAGED THE SV HAVE HAVE DECIDED TO COERCE ME TO THE ACCEPTANCE OF THEIR DESPICABLE CRIMES AND WRONG DOINGS, AND YOU BEGAN VIOLATING OF MY LEGAL RIGHTS AND HAVE ENGAGED INTO MY CONSTRUCTIVE EVICTION.

REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU MIGHT SAY NOW, THE FACT IS THAT AT THE TIME OF SIGNING OF THE 5-YEARS LEASE WITH YOU WE WERE WAITING TO BE ACCEPTED INTO THE SECTION 8 PROGRAM, AND WERE ABLE TO SIGN THIS LEASE WITH YOU ONLY BECAUSE YOU HAVE AGREED TO ACCEPT THE ALTERNATIVE PARTIAL PAYMENT OF OUR RENT FROM THIS PROGRAM. 

IF YOU, AND/OR MY EX-WIFE, WOULD HAVE A SUDDEN LAPSE OF MEMORY, I HAVE ON HAND THE NUMBER OF DOCUMENTS THAT CORROBORATE THE ABOVE STATED FACTS AND INDICATE THAT YOU WERE WELL AWARE ABOUT OUR ECONOMIC CRUNCH, AND HAVE AGREED TO ACCEPT THE PARTIAL PAYMENT OF OUR RENT FROM THIS OR THE OTHER PROGRAM!!! 

MOREOVER, DESPITE OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF OUR ECONOMIC SITUATION, AND OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE THAT WE HAVE THE PENDING APPLICATION FOR THE SECTION 8 PROGRAM, THERE IS NOTHING IN OUR LEASE AGREEMENT THAT WOULD INDICATE YOUR UNWILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT THE PARTIAL PAYMENT OF OUR RENT FROM THIS PROGRAM.  PERHAPS MOST IMPORTANTLY, THERE IS NOT A PRACTICAL REASON FOR YOU TO PREVENT ME (US) TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS, OR IN THE OTHER HOUSING PROGRAM, AND THERE IS ALSO NOTHING IN THE LEASE THAT SHOULD PREVENT ME TO DO THAT. 

THEREFORE, IT IS CLEAR THAT YOUR REFUSAL TO SIGN THE 'LANDLORD CERTIFICATION OF RENT" IS JUST YOUR ANOTHER CAPRICIOUS VIOLATION OF MY TENANT RIGHTS THAT COME FROM MY LEASE, AND FROM THE FEDERAL AND WASHINGTON STATE LAWS.  YOUR UNWILLINGNESS TO SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION ALSO DOCUMENTS YOUR CONTINUING IN THE ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTIVE EVICTION, AND IN YOUR INTEND TO INFLICT EVEN MORE DAMAGES THAT YOU HAVE ALREADY INFLICTED ON ME BEFORE. 

SINCE I KNOW THAT YOU LOVE TO HASSLE ME BY YOUR CREEPY RESPONSES TO MY WELL FOUNDED REQUESTS, AND TO HARASS ME BY YOUR SORDID E-MESSAGES RIPPLED BY THE MALICIOUS AND COMPLETELY UNTRUE ACCUSATIONS, THIS MESSAGE IS MY LAST ATTEMPT TO HAVE YOU TO SIGN THE 'LANDLORD CERTIFICATION OF RENT," AS YOU ARE REQUESTED BY THE KCHA, AND AS YOU ARE OBLIGATED TO DO SO REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT YOU LIKE THE PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT.   

BECAUSE OF THIS, AND BECAUSE DESPITE OF MY COUNTLESS PROTESTS YOU CONTINUE TO VIOLATE MY CREED AND WILLFULLY DEGRADE ME BY ADDRESSING ME BY MY FIST NAME ONLY, THERE WOULDN'T BE ANY FURTHER RESPONSE TO YOUR FUTURE E-MAIL ON THIS ISSUE, REGARDLESS OF WHAT KIND OF SORDID THINGS YOU WOULD STUFF THERE. 

Oli P. Glenn

From: Chris Oppfelt
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 18:12
To: Illtreated
  Oli:
 
This is the first time that there has ever been any mention of you trying to participate in the Section 8 program.  You did mention some subsidy you got while living in Bellevue for utilities and you were exploring whether a similar program was available from the City of Kirkland.  You asked if it might be possible to break out the portion of your rent payment that effectively was payment toward underlying utilities if such a subsidy program was available (which you later determined was not).  This is the first time I've heard you had "the ambitious plans that should improve our future economic situation" and that you were "waiting to be accepted into the Section 8 program".  Not sure who you were saying these things to but it wasn't me.
 
I would, again, suggest you consult with your attorney because you don't seem to be able to grasp that (a) a landlord can choose to participate in the Section 8 program -- not be compelled to participate in it by a tenant and (b) whatever "separate legal process" you choose to pursue against Wendy would be between you and her.  You two cannot alter the terms or parties to the existing lease without my consent.

Chris

From: Chris Oppfelt
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 07:49
To: Illtreated

Oli: 

One more thing...  KCHA doesn't just hand out rent subsidies to applicants.  They screen properties & landlords for suitability with their program and they assess whether a particular property represents an appropriate housing arrangement for the specific applicant.  I suggest you pay them a visit and have them review your website so they can understand your perspectives on your unit, your landlord, the overall condo complex, and the management personnel & support groups in charge of running the complex.  Asking a government agency to help pay the rent on the "last place on earth where you should ever be" should be an interesting conversation.

Good luck!
Chris

From: Chris Oppfelt
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 16:26
To: Oli

Oli:

Received a voice message today from a Vicki Jordan with the KCHA.  I left her a voice message back and referred her to your website for any information that she might need.

Chris  

From: Illtreated
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 22:48
To: Chris Oppfelt

Landlord Oppfelt! 

One more time I'm asking you to stop addressing me by my first name, only!    Based on my cultural background, addressing by the first name, only,  is the privilege reserved for the persons of equal age being in good, or in family relationship.  Violation of this cultural rule is considered a rudeness, and continuing in this manner despite of addressed person's objection is considered a gross insult and harassment.  The similar rules apply in Ukraine from where you have not long time ago descended, as well as in the United States of America where we live now. 
I'm about twice of your age, and under the circumstances when you act as a wicked shyster and call me a crazy old man that need a psychiatric help, your persistent addressing me by the first name only, despite of my countless protests, is not just a rudeness but it also makes up the illegal harassment.  Since you are willfully harassing me in this way, I'm promising you that in addition to paying the price the other atrocities that you have committed in order to hurt me, and to even kill me in your catty way, you will pay the price for this sort of harassment of yours as well.  I told you that countless times before, but you cynically ignore it and continue in insulting me and in harassing me in this way.  Therefore, I'll not repeat my objection anymore, but each of your previous and further violation of my cultural heritage by addressing my by my first name, only, will count as your willful insult and malicious harassment. 

*         *         *

I had just very briefly described to the KCHA case worker Vicki Jordan your reasons for refusing to certify that I'm paying to you the rent and offered her the Internet address to my website.  However, she quite correctly considered my problem with you, and/or with the Salish Village representatives, irrelevant to my application for the Section 8 program and refused to include this address to my file.  
She, however, asked me for permission to call you, and assured me that the only what she needs to know from you, and what she is interested to hear from you, is your confirmation that I live in your unit and pay you the rent; PERIOD!  I had granted her this permission, and I was in her office when she recorded the short and simple massage for you in this matter. 

The fact that you have before refused to sign the simple form that only states the amount of the rent that I pay to you, and which is completely irrelevant to you, and to our conflict, clearly demonstrates your abuse of your landlord position in order to harm me.  If you have ever went through my website, and your persistent references to my website prove that you have, then you know that if it is even mentioned there, then the actual amount of the rent that I pay to you  it is buried there somewhere under the great amount of the other information.  Since you present yourself as a specialist in the real estate field, you know that those information should NOT be in the range of interest of the Section 8 caseworker. 
Therefore, your message below, in which you inform me that instead of answering to Ms. Jordan's simple and explicit question whether, or not, I live in your unit you had "referred her to my website for any information that she might need," is the clear proof that in retaliation for my website, and for my strive for justice, you willfully abuse your landlord position on preventing me to improve my economic hardship, and on causing me still more damages. 

Your communication with Ms. Jordan, and with me in that matter, and especially the complete message that you left on her answering system, would be subpoenaed by the court and the proper consequences for you would result from there. 

Oli P. Glenn 

From: Chris Oppfelt
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 14:47
To: Oli

Oli:

Did you really write that the KCHA "considered my problem with you, and/or with the Salish Village representatives irrelevant to (your) application for the Section 8 program"?  That is too funny. You really expect me to believe that?
 
Did you happen to share with the KCHA that your landlord is not interested in participating in the Section 8 program?  Obviously not. 
 
Did you happen to share with the KCHA that you are one of two individuals that are the lessees on the current lease?  Is your ex-wife a party to the application you have submitted?  I suspect that the answer to both of these is "no".
 
Recall that I was witness to you being caught lying while under oath in the Superior Court of Washington on January 20, 2009.  As such, I have no interest in being involved with a scheme that unquestionably involves you lying to and attempting to defraud a government agency in order to receive financial assistance that you do not deserve.
 
How/why you continue to lie and try to bully your way out of the situation you caused is beyond me.
 
Here is a suggestion:  Why don't you forward this email string to Ms. Jordan and see what she thinks?
 
Chris 
From: Illtreated
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 14:22
To: Chris Oppfelt

Landlord Oppfelt!

You have repeatedly fail to specify what, according you, I was lying in the Superior Court of Washington on January 20, 2009, and just endlessly repeat your downright lie that you were witness to me being caught lying under oath. That is just a big bull of yours, of course. Being yourself the admitted twister and liar (possibly a pathological liar), you hope that your constantly repeated lies would eventually become truth and that you will somehow drag me on your sordid level. But it wouldn’t happen!!! 

To refresh your obviously crappy memory, I have to remind you that the hearing to which you are referring to was about extending of the temporally Protective Orders that I already had against YOU, and against your buddies DULIS and MASON.
I have obtained that Protective Order because YOU, THEY, and the lousy McCUE & ASSOCIATES INC. willfully brought me to the deep emotional and medical trauma, and you have become their hit-man and tried to make most out of it. While your buddies DULIS and MASON harassed me when I went outside, you had harassed me and tried to cause my premature death by combination of enormous stress and by the environment hazardous to my health while I was inside of your unit. In violation of every law in the book, you still continue in forcing of this hazardous environment on me.
Just remember, that shortly before, on December 10, 2008 you started mingling with my at-that-time-wife, and in addition to hassling me you had pushed her against me via e-mail. At the same time, your buddies DULIS and MASON were closely watching my apartment to see whether I'm death yet. When I didn't die, as you were expecting me, you had developed your wicked plan to divide us permanently by having her to file for the bogus Protective Order against me, and to get rid of me by setting me for its violation and having me jailed. This would allow you to revoke my 5-years lease that we have signed with you.

Based on this plan, your buddies DULIS and MASON rushed to Honduras, and crossed the State and Country borders with the intend to commit the crime of bribery and coercion there in order to make this plan working. Mason already bribed her by the large amount of money and by dubious services detrimental to our marriage before she left the country, and in Honduras they further bribed her, and also her parents, and coerced her to the cooperation in your wicked plan.
In addition, the 56 years old predatory sexual maniac DULIS solicited there sex from 22 years old Claudia X. While he was juggling her by his promises that he would defy the U.S. immigration laws and would bring her to the United States as his wife, you have continued in the malignant communication detrimental to our marriage, with my wife.
Then, by the end of 2008 those two villains DULIS and MASON brought her back to the United States, and coached her to filing for that preplanned bogus Protective Order against me. On January 5, 2009, she actually filed her phony Petition with the Court, and on January 16, 2009 the profoundly bias Judge HARRY McCARTHY violated my Constitutional rights and treated me in his courtroom worse than a second-class citizen. He completely ignored the tangible facts that I have submitted to him in 24 exhibits, and based exclusively on my coerced wife's lies granted her the bogus 2 years bogus Protective Order against me. Since the Protective Orders are designed to be easy to get for women, and to be extremely difficult to repeal, it took me next two and half month of hard work to have his bias bogus Order terminated. During that time, YOU, and your buddies DULIS and MASON, were looking for the opportunity to set me for its violation and have me jailed, and virtually held me a hostage in my home.

After you have, just a couple hours before the end of 2008, caused my nearly deadly trauma, on suggestion of the police officer with whom I have filed the report concerning your harassment and your unsuccessful attempt to kill me, I have filed for the Protective Order against you.
Then, on January 20, 2009, the same profoundly bias Judge HARRY McCARTHY that just a few days ago grossly violated my Constitutional rights and treated me in his courtroom worse than a second class citizen should, fairly, decide about extending of my petitions for the Protective Order that I had against you, and against your buddies DULIS and MASON. It was a TRAVESTY, and even his staff mistreated me in his courtroom at that time. And of course, he made you cheering and let YOU, and your buddies, to getaway with your heinous crimes.
His glaring injustice makes me wonder whether it is just the Scottish prefix in-front of his name, which he shares with the crooked owner of the McCUE & ASSOCIATES. I don’t know, but the answer might come up later.

I have studied the psychology of criminal elements, and I can understand to your desperate attempt to drag me on your sordid level and to cover up your crimes. You shouldn’t forgot, however, that the whole court process to which you are referring to was recorded, and the voice record from that case will prove that you lie, once again, why you are accusing me of lying under oath.
Since you so vigorously continue in your attempts, I have to also remind you on our hours-long conversation on November 26, 2008, when you came to my home and showed to be a complete shyster. In response to your crooked suggestions, I told you straight to your face that I am a straight shooter, and that I would newer adopt the lies, twists, and backstabbing that you have recommended to me as the best way in which I could deal with those two villainous sexual predators and racketeers DULIS and MASON.
I also told you that I was fighting the Communist creeps for the best part of my life, and that I’ll fight those two creeps in my way; and will fight even you if it would be necessary. So, it does not surprise me that you couldn’t step over your own shadow and apply your dirty twisted strategy on me. It also doesn’t surprise me that you screech that I try to bully my way out of the situation that not me, but your buddies and you have caused.

However, your sabotaging of my effort to get the government help that I am entitled to receive, and your slandering me at the government agency that I’m lying and attempting to defraud the agency in order to receive financial assistance that I do not deserve, that is a different story, landlord Oppfelt.

Although it is not any of your business, and you once again grossly interfere into my private affairs, I want to confirm for you that the caseworker for KCHA Ms. Jordan considered my problem with you, and/or with the Salish Village representatives irrelevant to my application for the Section 8 program. She has on file all messages that I have exchanged with you in the effort to have you signed the Landlord Certification of Rent form, and she quickly recognized that you want me to jump the lease that I have signed with you. However, she didn't want to know from me, or from you, anything about the reasons.
She also has the copy of our lease on file, and as a self-styled investment specialist you should know that from the legal point of view it is completely irrelevant who cosigned the lease. The Section 8 is a portable program, and for KCHA is only important who actually occupy the unit at the time when is subsidized.
If you still couldn’t understand to your landlord responsibilities, then let me speak with your legal advisor and I will explain it to him, or to her.

THE ONLY INFORMATION Ms. Jordan wanted from you was whether I live in your unit!!! And, as I said before, I was in her office when she told you that in the message that she left on your answering system. However, instead of furnishing this simple information, you have grossly slander me at KCHA and willfully sabotage the reception of the help for which I qualify!!! You will pay for it dearly, lord Oppfelt, I guarantee!!!

As I know you, you always have to have your last creepy word and you will send me some insulting and impertinent answer to this letter. However, I made the more than reasonable effort to have you understand that you willfully continue in the illegal harming of our lessee, and I'm not interested in wasting of any more time on further arguing with you.
Therefore, make a note that I'll leave your further creepy messages unanswered, but will include them to the long trail of your violations of law and of your malicious harassment.

Oli P. Glenn

From: Chris Oppfelt
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 18:16
To: Oli

Oli:

Please try to understand that you have zero credibility.  Zero. 
 
Demanding my assistance/cooperation in a scheme that unquestionably involves you lying to and attempting to defraud a government agency in order to receive financial assistance that you do not deserve is not going to work. 

Chris

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Thursday, November 12, 2009 2:58 PM
To:  Oli Glenn

Oli:

Received attached mailed notice of cleaning event to occur this weekend. Building J is scheduled for Sunday. Let me know if you will not be home between 9 AM and 6 PM that day so I can coordinate providing access to the unit as these folks work their way through the complex.

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  Friday, November 13, 2009 12:17 AM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

Please, revise your communication with me. Because of your deplorable actions, I have asked you countless times to stop violating of my cultural heritage and to stop addressing me by my first name only.

Oli P. Glenn

REMAINDER ON THE ONE YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF OPPFELT'S ATTEMPT TO KILL ME, AND HIS CREEPY RESPONSES

THE BLOODY SHYSTER OPPFELT BECAME DULIS', MASON's, AND McCUE's ENTHUSIASTIC HIT-MAN, AND EXACTLY YEAR FROM NOW, ON DECEMBER 31, 2008, HE ALMOST CAUSED MY UNTIMELY DEATH - KILLED ME. 
I HAVE CONSIDERED APPROPRIATE TO REMIND THIS BLOODY CREEP ON HIS HEINOUS ACT, BUT OF COURSE, HE COULDN'T OVERSTEP HIS SHADOW, AND AS ALWAYS HE TOOK IT AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR MOCKING ME.  I KNOW THAT THIS SHYSTER MUST ALWAYS HAVE HIS LAST WOOF, SO  I WASN'T ABOUT TO WASTE ANY MORE OF MY TIME WITH HIM AND HADN'T RESPOND TO HIS LAST CREEPY MESSAGE ANYMORE.

IT IS CLEAR, HOWEVER THAT HE CYNICALLY RELIES ON THE FACT THAT HIS CREEPY ACCOMPLICES DULIS AND MASON BRAINWASHED, BRIBED, AND COERCED MY AT-THAT-TIME WIFE SO WELL THAT THEY DEFINITELY DEPRIVED ME OF THE KEY WITNESS.  HOWEVER, THERE ARE TONS OF THE OTHER EVIDENCE AND HE WOULD HAVE HIS COURT DAY.  AND, I AMD POSITIVE THAT IT GOING TO BE VERY ENLIGHTENING EXPERIENCE FOR HIM.

From:  OddBuster
Sent:  Thursday, December 31, 2009 9:34 PM
To:  Shyster-Landlord Oppfelt

In Kirkland, on December 31, 2009

Oppfelt,, exactly a year from now you have tried to cause my untimely death - to murder me!!! Since you have proved to be a wicked creep and calumniator with selective memory, I'll make a brief recap for you.

The second half of the year 2008, was hard to bear for me and you have done everything to make it even worse. After your buddies in crime Dulis and Mason brainwashed, seduced, bribed, and eventually removed my naive at that time wife from our home, you have tried to force me to the quiet acceptance of their crimes and their abuses of power in Salish Village. When it didn't work, you have accused me of being a crazy old man that become seriously ill and useless, and tries to take on the innocent Salish Village homeowners because my much younger adulterous wife left him for a younger man.

When you were not able to break me down, you have begun plotting with them against me, and helped them to coerce my at-that-time wife to backstab me by her phony Petition for the bogus Protective Order. Together with your creepy buddies you planed to set me for its violation, which would land me in jail and would give you the reason to terminate my lease in the case that I would survive you further onslaught. In order to protect them, you wanted me to drop the lease, and to leave, just two months after I sweated blood and put your lousy rundown condominium into the livable order.
At the same time, you were wickedly exploiting my emotional crisis, and my potentially deadly medical condition, and on December 31, 2008, exactly a year from now you have tried to cause my untimely death - to murder me!!! Since you are a sleek creep, you have tried to murder me in the snide way and then play an innocent landlord housing a crazy tenant.

However, to your great disappointment, I was able to recover, somewhat, and eventually was even able to spoil your plot. Seeing that neither of your creepy plans would work, during entire year of 2009, you have malevolently abused our lease agreement, trammeled my usufruct. You, continue in inflicting of still new damages on me as we speak.
On the one side, you use the strategy of the illegal Constructive Eviction in order to get rid of me, and on the other, by the end of this year you have prevented me to qualify for the Section 8 Program that would allow you to do that.

You have refused to sign this simple certification form requested by the KCHA, just because according your twisted mind, I was "demanding your assistance/cooperation in a scheme that unquestionably involves me lying to and attempting to defraud a government agency in order to receive financial assistance that I do not deserve"; and because "you have no interest in being involved with a scheme that unquestionably involves me lying to and attempting to defraud a government agency in order to receive financial assistance that I do not deserve"; and because "how/why I continue to lie and try to bully my way out of the situation I caused is beyond you." On top of that, instead of simply certifying that I pay you the rent as I do, you have falsely accused me of lying under oath.

In the other words, being admitted villain, and probably pathological liar, and a lie-pusher, you are calling me a liar and want to bring me on your sordid level. You clearly believe that your endlessly repeated lies would eventually become truth, and according you, not the doctors and government officials and agencies, but the bloody shyster-landlord Oppfelt would decide for what help I would qualify.
So, I have to remind you that I leave by the Ten Commandments, why you don't, and that all I want is the justice on which you look with barefaced cynicism. Therefore, if somebody bullies here, then it is just you, OPPFELT!!! Your sons should be really proud on you!!!

Just remember that you tried to persuade me that lying, twisting and backstabbing is the best strategy, and had admitted that it is your nature to deal with the problems in that way. While you were mentoring me, you have actually who you really are!!! Therefore, it didn't surprise me too much that thereafter you have urged me to deal with your buddies in crime Dulis and Mason in that way.
To your resentment, I told you that I'm a straight shooter and would deal with these two villainous sexual predators in my way; but I won't stop pursuing them until I will get justice. You have become cynical about my intention, and had thrown to my face that your profit is far more important for you than any justice and the quality of my life.
Seeing that I am dealing with the accomplished villain that pretended to be a nice guy, starting with my e- mail from December 01, 2008 5:39 PM, I have composed my further correspondence in the way that would capture your words and deeds. I wanted to have your lies and twists recorded as precisely as possible, and to give you the chance to dispute my records if you'd find them incomplete or untrue. Not surprisingly, you have never disputed anything, although you spent a lot of time in your responses on your Pharisee-like "caring" about me and on patronizing me.

Instead of trying to dispute at that time fresh facts, you have cattily beguiled from me my at-that-time wife's e-mail address, and together with your buddies in crime Dulis and Mason had begun plotting against me. I'm positive that you remember all of it very well, but it seems to me that you think that you could act as you still would be in Ukraine, and believe that no American laws, rules and regulations apply to you. However, it happened that I know Ukraine and the people there quite well. Therefore, I could say that you are really something else!!! Regardless of what you actually think, or believe, it is obvious that you feel that you are a LORD-like OPPFELT that can outsmart everybody with the lies and twists. Therefore, you can commit crimes in the United States, and could violate here just about every law in the book with impunity.

I have to also remind you that despite of my numerous requests, you have never specified how I have caused that your equally creepy buddies Dulis and Mason abused their positions in Salish Village, and how I made them to destroy my marriage, my lucrative business venture, and my life!!! Instead, you are increasingly bold in repeating of your old dirty insults, lies and accusations.
While you wickedly patronize me, and pretend that you want to normalize our landlord-tenant relations, you refuse to fulfill your landlord duties and your promises that you gave us at the time of signing the lease. On top of that, you also violate the applicable laws, and deliberately impose on me the conditions that enormously increase my health problems and the chance of my untimely death!!!
You have become Dulis', Mason's and McCue's enthusiastic hit-man, and I don't know for how long I would be able survive under the savage conditions that you purposely maintain in your lousy condominium in order to harm me. However, I know that if I would die before I will make you pay for your unlawful and truly criminal actions against me, and if my death was preventable, then YOU would be nothing but a murderer solely responsible for my untimely death. Therefore, I made sure that you would be prosecuted for your crime!!!

Being truly tired of your Pharisee-like hypocrisy, and of your dirty lies and wicked accusations, I am developing the website that describes and documents that bizarre court hearing on January 20, 2009, which you wickedly use as a pretense for your maligned attacks. The site also describes what, why, and how all of it really happened. I'll send you the link.

The end of the year is not just the time of remembrance, but it is also the time of wishes and resolutions taken for the new year. Since you were obstinate with your demands to speak with my lawyer, and are anxious to justify your crimes and law violations in court, I promise you that you will have your court-day, and wish you, and to your family, to be forced to deal in the upcoming year with the same sort of twisted creep(s) as you are.

Shame on you.
Sincerely,
Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Sunday, January 03, 2010 9:03 PM
To:  Oli

Oli:

So glad to hear from you on New Year's Eve.
I've got a couple suggestions for great New Year's resolutions for you:
   1. Wise up and realize that your lying and bullying is not going to get you anywhere.
   2. Embrace brevity.

As Mr. Hand would say -- "Read 'em, learn 'em, live 'em."

Happy New Year!
Chris

From:  Illtreated
Sent:  Sunday, January 03, 2010 11:45 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

OPPFELT;

While embracing brevity, I need to tell you as follows.
Since I have a complete picture of you, I would never ask for any of your suggestions. So, stick them to your ear!!!
Since you've proved to me that you are an accomplished and probably a pathological liar and twister, it doesn't surprise me that you are accusing me of lying. That's what creeps typically do!!!
Since I also know that being blinded by your wicked puffiness you are all mixed-up, it doesn't surprise me that you cynically call to my struggle for justice "bullying." That's what creeps also do!!!

The old proverb says, "who laughs as last, gets the best." But it wouldn't be you.

BURN IN HELL!!!
Your boys could be "really proud" on their daddy!!! But you shouldn't be allowed to be anywhere near to the other children.

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Monday, January 04, 2010 6:31 PM
To:  Oli Glenn

Oli:

Atta boy! One out of two is a good start. Keep at it.

FYI... I don't call your struggle for justice "bullying". You want revenge -- not justice. Big difference. Bullying and lying, on the other hand, are just a couple of your childish tactics.

Thanks for your kind wishes. Which of the Ten Commandments inspired such thoughtfulness on your part?

Chris

From:  Kamarech
Sent:  Monday, January 04, 2010 9:15 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

OPPFELT;

Same old BLAH, BLAH, BLAH of the proven bloody creep, caustic lies-pusher and arrogant law violator. According you, the entire justice system pursue a revenge!!! In your arrogant puffiness, you obviously missed that your parents brought you to the country governed by law. If you would be a Christian, you would know that such creeps as you are fated to burn in HELL. You're attempted murderer, so read the Bible and don't bother!!!
Your drivels are not even worth to answer.

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Tuesday, January 05, 2010 10:47 AM
To:  Oli

Oli:

"Justice" was served when you were caught lying under oath in the Superior Court of Washington on January 20, 2009. You will never be able to hide from that so why even try.

If you don't like getting slapped around and put in your place, do me a favor and spare me your goofy emails.

Chris

From:  Illtreated
Sent:  Tuesday, January 05, 2010 4:56 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

OPPFELT;

Likewise you lying calumniator!!! Just remember that I have intended to keep you out of this mess. However, since the birds of feather always flock together, you have forced yourself between me and those two complete creeps, villainous sexual predators, embezzlers and racketeers Dulis and Mason. You have willfully become their enthusiastic hit-man, began messing with my wife, largely contributed to our schism, and have frivolously inflicted sizable damages on me.

Your view of me is nothing new. The crooks do the crooked things because they think that they will getaway with them, and those that feel untouchable typically view their opponents struggling for common justice as being childish.

My end-of-the-year letter meant to be a wakeup call for you, and should make you think what you are doing and why. It should also encourage you to start obeying the applicable laws, pay for damages that you have done to me, fulfill your promises that you have initially gave us, and to start fulfilling your landlord duties.

Unfortunately, you have showed, once again, that you are helplessly arrogant, and call to my struggle for justice a revenge, bullying and childish tactics. Therefore any conversation with you seems to be pointless, so I’m ending this fruitless exchange with the old proverb “who plants the wind, harvests the storm.”

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Wednesday, January 06, 2010 1:56 PM
To:  Oli

Oli:

Sorry to burst your bubble but I've never done anything to force myself between you and Craig/Carl. Never have. Never will.

Chris

From:  Illtreated
Sent:  Wednesday, January 06, 2010 10:07 PM
To:  Chris Oppfelt

OPPFELT;

You are a bloody liar and lies-pusher, and obviously think that you will lie your way out of your responsibility for your crimes, law violations and for your unethical actions!!!
It is documented that you have demanded my at-that-time wife's email address when, based on my advice, she was in Honduras to be safe there. After I gave it to you, you had become abusing our agreement of three-polar communication, and instigated her against me by your wicked lies and by your derogatory statements about me.
Then, after those two villainous sexual predators, embezzlers and racketeers Dulis and Mason rushed to Honduras to further bribe her there, as well as her parents, and to brainwash her and coerce her there to filing of the phony Petition for bogus Protective Order against me, you had conspired with them against me in order to hurt me and to get me out of my home in Salish Village.
When, based on our agreement, I have demanded the copies of the e-mail that you have exchanged with her, you became cynical and refused to give them to me. By the end of the year, you had wickedly exploited my wretched medical condition and willfully drove me to the near death trauma.
So, shut your bloody lying mouth, and don’t bother me anymore by sending me your twisted bulls.

Your freaked lies will not change the documented reality, and I have no intention to waste anymore time on responding to your shameless bulls. I already told you the reason for my end-of-the-year message, and this is my last message to you regarding this matter. Your next message in this matter would be left without my response, and would be used as the proof of your intention to unlawfully harass me.

Oli P. Glenn

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Thursday, January 07, 2010 11:49 AM
To:  Oli

Oli:

You initiated this email string with the subject "The Time to Remember". Remembering what you want to believe happened is pointless. Your "documented reality" is, unfortunately for you, a house of cards. And, the conclusions you have arrived at -- that are built upon significant errors of fact -- are hopelessly flawed. The next "court day" you promise will be a very enlightening experience for you.

Chris

BEING HARASSED OVER THE RENEWAL OF TABS ON MY PARKED CAR

THOSE "GOOD" PEOPLE FROM THE LOUSY PINNACLE MANAGING COMPANY DO NOT CARE ABOUT TERRIBLE IMAGE THAT THOSE TWO WICKED SEXUAL PREDATORS, EMBEZZLERS, AND RACKETEERS DULIS AND MASON GAVE TO SALISH VILLAGE, AND ARROGANTLY MAINTAIN THEM IN THEIR POSITIONS.  THEY CARE EVEN LESS ABOUT THE FACT THAT THOSE TWO CREEPS ABUSE THEIR TOP POSITIONS THERE, VIOLATE THE APPLICABLE LAWS, AND SALISH VILLAGE RULES AND INFLICTED ENORMOUS DAMAGES ON ME. 

THEY ALSO DO NOT CARE THAT THE SALISH VILLAGE HOA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS, AND THAT HARBORING OF CRIMINALS IS THE CRIME. 
THEY ALSO DON'T CARE THAT IN VIOLATION OF SALISH VILLAGE RULES, THROUGHOUT THE SUMER THE PRESIDENT FOR SALISH VILLAGE HOA - SEXUAL PREDATOR DULIS PARKS THERE HIS THREE JUNKS, AND ON TOP OF THAT ALSO TAKES THE THREE ADDITIONAL PARKING PLACES BY THE TRAILER WITH HIS SHABBY BOAT. 
THEY ALSO DON'T CARE THAT SOME RESIDENTS PARK THERE COMPLETE JUNKS, AND THAT IN VIOLATION OF SALISH VILLAGE RULES THE CARS WITH THE OUT OF STATE LICENSE PLATES PARK THERE FOR YEARS. 

HOWEVER, IN THEIR FREAKED MINDS THE NOT RENEWED TABS ON MY CAR PARKED IN FRONT OF MY UNIT TAKES SO MUCH OF SALISH VILLAGE BEAUTY, VALUE, AND UNIFORM APPEARANCE, THAT THEY MUST THREATEN ME BY TOWING IF I WOULDN'T RENEW THEM IN 10 DAYS.  
MR. JIM BASKA - THE INVESTMENT MANAGER FOR THE LOUSY PINNACLE EVEN STEPPED DOWN FROM HIS ARROGANT HEIGHTS, AND BRIDGED THE ALLEGED PINNACLE'S POLICY TO NEVER DEAL WITH THE "ONLY TENANTS, AND TO DEAL EXCLUSIVELY WITH THE HOMEOWNERS."   TO MY ASTONISHMENT, ALTHOUGH HE REFUSED TO EVEN SPEAK WITH ME BEFORE IN DULIS' AND MASON's CASE, AT THIS TIME HE TOOK HIS VALUABLE TIME AND WROTE  ME HIS PERSONAL THREATENING LETTER. 
IRONICALLY, I HAVE ACTUALLY FORGOTTEN TO RENEW THOSE TABS, AND DEFINITELY UNINTENTIONALLY, THOSE "GOOD" PEOPLE DID GOOD FOR ME AT THIS TIME.  SO, I HAVE PROMPTLY RENEWED THEM, AND REGARDLESS OF WHAT THEIR INTENTION COULD BE, I HAD TO GIVE THEM MANY THANKS.  

SEE THEIR HASSLING LETTER AND MY LETTER OF APPRECIATION.

IN THE OBVIOUS ATTEMPT TO SHORTEN FOR ME THE TIME TO THE ORDERED DEATH LINE, THE SHYSTER-LANDLORD OPPFELT HELD THIS HARASSING LETTER FOR SEVERAL DAYS, AND AT THE TIME WHEN HE EVENTUALLY E-MAILED I HAD BEEN ALREADY WORKING ON THIS "TERRIBLE" AND FOR THOSE CREEPS UNACCEPTABLE PROBLEM. 

SO, I HAVE RESPONDED HIM IN THE SAME CROOKED WAY AS HE NUMEROUSLY RESPONDED ME BEFORE. 
SEE HIS CREEPY E-MAIL FROM:
December 03, 2008 9:19 AM
December 03, 2008 9:00 PM
December 09, 2008 9:31 AM

From:  Chris Oppfelt
Sent:  Saturday, January 16, 2010 8:02 PM
To:  Oli Glenn

Oli:

I just received a letter from Pinnacle in today's mail. They recently did an inspection of Salish Village and identified that "the vehicle parked in (my) unit's assigned parking spot does not have current license plates." They noted that the tabs expired September 2009. Evidently, Association rules require that all vehicles on the premises be operable and properly licensed. Failure to comply allows the property manager to order the vehicle towed at the vehicle owner's risk & expense.

If this is your vehicle I would get the tabs renewed as soon as possible or else find some place offsite where you can store it. Their letter was dated January 12, 2010 and they indicated that they would wait 10 days before taking any action to order the vehicle towed.

Chris

From: Kamarech
Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 9:09 PM
To: Chris Oppfelt

OPPFELT;

Please revise your communication to me!
I am unable to read your last email as it is not in keeping with my multiple times repeated request. Specifically, I asked you to respect our crummy landlord - tenant relationship with regard to communicating with me and to not address me by my first name only.
I stopped reading this message because you are willfully insulting me by not respecting of my request and violate the common courtesy.

Oli P. Glenn

SEE HIS SHYSTER E-MAIL FROM:
December 03, 2008 9:19 AM
December 03, 2008 9:00 PM
December 09, 2008 9:31 AM
I think that it is just fair to request the same form him.